R. Tariq, S. Malik, Renisha Redij, Shivaram Arunachalam, William A. Faubion, S. Khanna
{"title":"Machine Learning-based Prediction Models for C difficile Infection: A Systematic Review.","authors":"R. Tariq, S. Malik, Renisha Redij, Shivaram Arunachalam, William A. Faubion, S. Khanna","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nDespite research efforts, predicting Clostridioides difficile incidence and its outcomes remains challenging. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the performance of machine-learning (ML) models in predicting CDI incidence and complications using clinical data from electronic health records.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a comprehensive search of databases (OVID, Embase, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception up to September 2023. Studies employing ML techniques for predicting CDI or its complications were included. The primary outcome was the type and performance of ML models assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwelve retrospective studies that evaluated CDI incidence and/or outcomes were included. The most common used ML models were random forest and Gradient Boosting. The AUROC ranged from 0.60 to 0.81 for predicting CDI incidence, 0.59 to 0.80 for recurrence, and 0.64 to 0.88 for predicting complications. Advanced ML models demonstrated similar performance to traditional logistic regression. However, there was notable heterogeneity in defining CDI and the different outcomes, including incidence, recurrence, and complications, and a lack of external validation in most studies.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nML models show promise in predicting CDI incidence and outcomes. However, the observed heterogeneity in CDI definitions and the lack of real-world validation highlight challenges in clinical implementation. Future research should focus on external validation and the use of standardized definitions across studies.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Despite research efforts, predicting Clostridioides difficile incidence and its outcomes remains challenging. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the performance of machine-learning (ML) models in predicting CDI incidence and complications using clinical data from electronic health records.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of databases (OVID, Embase, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception up to September 2023. Studies employing ML techniques for predicting CDI or its complications were included. The primary outcome was the type and performance of ML models assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
RESULTS
Twelve retrospective studies that evaluated CDI incidence and/or outcomes were included. The most common used ML models were random forest and Gradient Boosting. The AUROC ranged from 0.60 to 0.81 for predicting CDI incidence, 0.59 to 0.80 for recurrence, and 0.64 to 0.88 for predicting complications. Advanced ML models demonstrated similar performance to traditional logistic regression. However, there was notable heterogeneity in defining CDI and the different outcomes, including incidence, recurrence, and complications, and a lack of external validation in most studies.
CONCLUSION
ML models show promise in predicting CDI incidence and outcomes. However, the observed heterogeneity in CDI definitions and the lack of real-world validation highlight challenges in clinical implementation. Future research should focus on external validation and the use of standardized definitions across studies.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric.
Indexed/Abstracted:
Web of Science SCIE
Scopus
CAS
INSPEC
Portico