AI in knowledge sharing, which ethical challenges are raised in decision-making processes for organisations?

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Management Decision Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1108/md-10-2023-2023
Mojtaba Rezaei, Marco Pironti, Roberto Quaglia
{"title":"AI in knowledge sharing, which ethical challenges are raised in decision-making processes for organisations?","authors":"Mojtaba Rezaei, Marco Pironti, Roberto Quaglia","doi":"10.1108/md-10-2023-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to identify and assess the key ethical challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in knowledge-sharing (KS) practices and their implications for decision-making (DM) processes within organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a mixed-methods approach, beginning with a comprehensive literature review to extract background information on AI and KS and to identify potential ethical challenges. Subsequently, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is conducted using data collected from individuals employed in business settings to validate the challenges identified in the literature and assess their impact on DM processes.FindingsThe findings reveal that challenges related to privacy and data protection, bias and fairness and transparency and explainability are particularly significant in DM. Moreover, challenges related to accountability and responsibility and the impact of AI on employment also show relatively high coefficients, highlighting their importance in the DM process. In contrast, challenges such as intellectual property and ownership, algorithmic manipulation and global governance and regulation are found to be less central to the DM process.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the ethical challenges of AI in knowledge management (KM) and DM within organisations. By providing insights and recommendations for researchers, managers and policymakers, the study emphasises the need for a holistic and collaborative approach to harness the benefits of AI technologies whilst mitigating their associated risks.","PeriodicalId":18046,"journal":{"name":"Management Decision","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Decision","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2023-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to identify and assess the key ethical challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in knowledge-sharing (KS) practices and their implications for decision-making (DM) processes within organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a mixed-methods approach, beginning with a comprehensive literature review to extract background information on AI and KS and to identify potential ethical challenges. Subsequently, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is conducted using data collected from individuals employed in business settings to validate the challenges identified in the literature and assess their impact on DM processes.FindingsThe findings reveal that challenges related to privacy and data protection, bias and fairness and transparency and explainability are particularly significant in DM. Moreover, challenges related to accountability and responsibility and the impact of AI on employment also show relatively high coefficients, highlighting their importance in the DM process. In contrast, challenges such as intellectual property and ownership, algorithmic manipulation and global governance and regulation are found to be less central to the DM process.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the ethical challenges of AI in knowledge management (KM) and DM within organisations. By providing insights and recommendations for researchers, managers and policymakers, the study emphasises the need for a holistic and collaborative approach to harness the benefits of AI technologies whilst mitigating their associated risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识共享中的人工智能,对组织决策过程提出了哪些伦理挑战?
目的本研究旨在确定和评估与将人工智能(AI)整合到知识共享(KS)实践中相关的主要伦理挑战及其对组织内决策(DM)流程的影响。研究采用了一种混合方法,首先进行全面的文献综述,以提取有关人工智能和知识共享的背景信息,并确定潜在的伦理挑战。研究结果研究结果表明,与隐私和数据保护、偏见和公平性以及透明度和可解释性相关的挑战在 DM 中尤为重要。此外,与问责制和责任相关的挑战以及人工智能对就业的影响也显示出相对较高的系数,凸显了它们在管理流程中的重要性。相比之下,知识产权和所有权、算法操纵以及全球治理和监管等挑战在管理过程中的重要性较低。通过为研究人员、管理人员和政策制定者提供见解和建议,本研究强调了采取全面协作方法的必要性,以利用人工智能技术的优势,同时降低其相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ■In-depth studies of major issues ■Operations management ■Financial management ■Motivation ■Entrepreneurship ■Problem solving and proactivity ■Serious management argument ■Strategy and policy issues ■Tactics for turning around company crises Management Decision, considered by many to be the best publication in its field, consistently offers thoughtful and provocative insights into current management practice. As such, its high calibre contributions from leading management philosophers and practitioners make it an invaluable resource in the aggressive and demanding trading climate of the Twenty-First Century.
期刊最新文献
Nonprofits and community resilience during a pandemic: a France-Quebec perspective Integration strategy formulation of foreign-owned R&D subsidiaries Fostering community resilience through the lived experience of terrorist incidents Supervisor bottom-line mentality and subordinate knowledge hiding: role of team climate Exploring the heuristics behind the transition to a circular economy in the textile industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1