The impact of regulation on the quality of care in nursing homes in Ireland: a time-series analysis of change in compliance

L. Behan, Carol Grogan, L. Keyes
{"title":"The impact of regulation on the quality of care in nursing homes in Ireland: a time-series analysis of change in compliance","authors":"L. Behan, Carol Grogan, L. Keyes","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13821.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Quality in health and social care is of paramount importance. Regulation is often used for ensuring or promoting quality in care services. Services are typically regulated by independent public authorities, which monitor services for compliance with regulations. There is limited research, however, on services’ compliance with regulations to provide a high quality of care. This study aims to examine nursing home compliance with regulations relating to quality. Methods Secondary legislation used for regulating nursing homes in Ireland was mapped to the Donabedian’s quality framework with each regulation categorised as either “structure”, “process” or “outcome”. The regulations categorised as “outcome” were determined to be quality-related regulations; such regulations were extracted and became this study’s area of focus. Published inspection reports from the regulator in Ireland for a three year period (2019 to 2021) (n=1,153) were assessed. The frequency with which the “outcome regulations” were inspected in nursing homes, and the proportion of compliance achieved, was calculated. Change in compliance levels across the three years was evaluated using Chi2 tests. Results Ten regulations were categorised as “outcome regulations” and addressed the following areas: positive behaviour; protection; residents' rights; communication; visits; personal possessions; food and nutrition; information for residents; medicines and pharmaceutical services; and complaints procedures. Compliance with two regulations (‘Regulation 9: Residents’ rights’ and ‘Regulation 11: Visits’) significantly improved during the three years (p<0.05). Compliance with ‘Regulation 12: Personal Possessions’ significantly decreased over the three years, however, so did the proportion found not compliant. While there was no significant change in the other regulations examined, compliance trended towards improvement, except for one regulation, ‘Regulation 20: Information for residents’, which trended downwards. Conclusion This analysis of national-level data found improvements in compliance across nearly all quality-related regulations demonstrating that regulation can be a positive influence on quality maintenance and improvement.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13821.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Quality in health and social care is of paramount importance. Regulation is often used for ensuring or promoting quality in care services. Services are typically regulated by independent public authorities, which monitor services for compliance with regulations. There is limited research, however, on services’ compliance with regulations to provide a high quality of care. This study aims to examine nursing home compliance with regulations relating to quality. Methods Secondary legislation used for regulating nursing homes in Ireland was mapped to the Donabedian’s quality framework with each regulation categorised as either “structure”, “process” or “outcome”. The regulations categorised as “outcome” were determined to be quality-related regulations; such regulations were extracted and became this study’s area of focus. Published inspection reports from the regulator in Ireland for a three year period (2019 to 2021) (n=1,153) were assessed. The frequency with which the “outcome regulations” were inspected in nursing homes, and the proportion of compliance achieved, was calculated. Change in compliance levels across the three years was evaluated using Chi2 tests. Results Ten regulations were categorised as “outcome regulations” and addressed the following areas: positive behaviour; protection; residents' rights; communication; visits; personal possessions; food and nutrition; information for residents; medicines and pharmaceutical services; and complaints procedures. Compliance with two regulations (‘Regulation 9: Residents’ rights’ and ‘Regulation 11: Visits’) significantly improved during the three years (p<0.05). Compliance with ‘Regulation 12: Personal Possessions’ significantly decreased over the three years, however, so did the proportion found not compliant. While there was no significant change in the other regulations examined, compliance trended towards improvement, except for one regulation, ‘Regulation 20: Information for residents’, which trended downwards. Conclusion This analysis of national-level data found improvements in compliance across nearly all quality-related regulations demonstrating that regulation can be a positive influence on quality maintenance and improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管对爱尔兰养老院护理质量的影响:对合规变化的时间序列分析
背景 医疗和社会护理的质量至关重要。监管通常用于确保或促进护理服务的质量。服务通常由独立的公共机构监管,这些机构负责监督服务是否符合规定。然而,有关服务机构遵守法规以提供高质量护理服务的研究却十分有限。本研究旨在考察养老院是否遵守与质量相关的法规。方法 将爱尔兰用于监管疗养院的二级法规与多纳比德质量框架进行映射,并将每项法规分为 "结构"、"过程 "或 "结果 "三类。被归类为 "结果 "的法规被确定为与质量相关的法规;这些法规被提取出来,成为本研究的重点领域。对爱尔兰监管机构发布的三年期(2019 年至 2021 年)检查报告(n=1,153)进行了评估。计算了疗养院检查 "结果条例 "的频率以及达到要求的比例。采用 Chi2 检验法评估了三年内合规水平的变化。结果 十项条例被归类为 "结果条例",涉及以下方面:积极行为、保护、住客权利、沟通、探访、个人物品、食品和营养、住客信息、药品和医药服务以及投诉程序。在这三年中,两项条例("条例 9:住客权利 "和 "条例 11:探访")的遵守情况明显改善(p<0.05)。条例 12:个人物品 "的合规率在三年内明显下降,但不合规的比例也有所下降。其他条例的合规情况没有明显变化,但 "条例 20:居民信息 "的合规情况呈下降趋势。结论 这份国家级数据分析发现,几乎所有与质量有关的条例的合规情况都有所改善,这表明条例对质量的保持和提高具有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1