Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids: The ALPS Follow-Up Study.

JAMA Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.4303
Cynthia GYAMFI-BANNERMAN, R. Clifton, Alan T N Tita, Sean C Blackwell, Monica Longo, Jessica A de Voest, T. M. O'Shea, S. Bousleiman, Felecia Ortiz, D. J. Rouse, Torri D. Metz, George R Saade, Kara M Rood, Kent D Heyborne, J. M. Thorp, G.K. Swamy, William A. Grobman, Kelly S Gibson, Yasser Y. El-Sayed, G. Macones
{"title":"Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids: The ALPS Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Cynthia GYAMFI-BANNERMAN, R. Clifton, Alan T N Tita, Sean C Blackwell, Monica Longo, Jessica A de Voest, T. M. O'Shea, S. Bousleiman, Felecia Ortiz, D. J. Rouse, Torri D. Metz, George R Saade, Kara M Rood, Kent D Heyborne, J. M. Thorp, G.K. Swamy, William A. Grobman, Kelly S Gibson, Yasser Y. El-Sayed, G. Macones","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.4303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nThe Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial changed clinical practice in the United States by finding that antenatal betamethasone at 34 to 36 weeks decreased short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, the trial also found increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia after betamethasone. This follow-up study focused on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after late preterm steroids.\n\n\nObjective\nTo evaluate whether administration of late preterm (34-36 completed weeks) corticosteroids affected childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nProspective follow-up study of children aged 6 years or older whose birthing parent had enrolled in the multicenter randomized clinical trial, conducted at 13 centers that participated in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network cycle from 2011-2016. Follow-up was from 2017-2022.\n\n\nExposure\nTwelve milligrams of intramuscular betamethasone administered twice 24 hours apart.\n\n\nMain Outcome and Measures\nThe primary outcome of this follow-up study was a General Conceptual Ability score less than 85 (-1 SD) on the Differential Ability Scales, 2nd Edition (DAS-II). Secondary outcomes included the Gross Motor Function Classification System level and Social Responsiveness Scale and Child Behavior Checklist scores. Multivariable analyses adjusted for prespecified variables known to be associated with the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability weighting and also modeled the outcome for those lost to follow-up.\n\n\nResults\nOf 2831 children, 1026 enrolled and 949 (479 betamethasone, 470 placebo) completed the DAS-II at a median age of 7 years (IQR, 6.6-7.6 years). Maternal, neonatal, and childhood characteristics were similar between groups except that neonatal hypoglycemia was more common in the betamethasone group. There were no differences in the primary outcome, a general conceptual ability score less than 85, which occurred in 82 (17.1%) of the betamethasone vs 87 (18.5%) of the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.22). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting or assigning outcomes to children lost to follow-up also found no differences between groups.\n\n\nConclusion and Relevance\nIn this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial, administration of antenatal corticosteroids to persons at risk of late preterm delivery, originally shown to improve short-term neonatal respiratory outcomes but with an increased rate of hypoglycemia, was not associated with adverse childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 6 years or older.","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial changed clinical practice in the United States by finding that antenatal betamethasone at 34 to 36 weeks decreased short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, the trial also found increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia after betamethasone. This follow-up study focused on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after late preterm steroids. Objective To evaluate whether administration of late preterm (34-36 completed weeks) corticosteroids affected childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective follow-up study of children aged 6 years or older whose birthing parent had enrolled in the multicenter randomized clinical trial, conducted at 13 centers that participated in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network cycle from 2011-2016. Follow-up was from 2017-2022. Exposure Twelve milligrams of intramuscular betamethasone administered twice 24 hours apart. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome of this follow-up study was a General Conceptual Ability score less than 85 (-1 SD) on the Differential Ability Scales, 2nd Edition (DAS-II). Secondary outcomes included the Gross Motor Function Classification System level and Social Responsiveness Scale and Child Behavior Checklist scores. Multivariable analyses adjusted for prespecified variables known to be associated with the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability weighting and also modeled the outcome for those lost to follow-up. Results Of 2831 children, 1026 enrolled and 949 (479 betamethasone, 470 placebo) completed the DAS-II at a median age of 7 years (IQR, 6.6-7.6 years). Maternal, neonatal, and childhood characteristics were similar between groups except that neonatal hypoglycemia was more common in the betamethasone group. There were no differences in the primary outcome, a general conceptual ability score less than 85, which occurred in 82 (17.1%) of the betamethasone vs 87 (18.5%) of the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.22). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting or assigning outcomes to children lost to follow-up also found no differences between groups. Conclusion and Relevance In this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial, administration of antenatal corticosteroids to persons at risk of late preterm delivery, originally shown to improve short-term neonatal respiratory outcomes but with an increased rate of hypoglycemia, was not associated with adverse childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 6 years or older.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期早产儿使用产前皮质类固醇后的神经发育结果:ALPS 随访研究
重要性产前晚期早产类固醇(ALPS)试验发现,在 34 到 36 周进行产前倍他米松治疗可降低新生儿短期呼吸系统发病率,从而改变了美国的临床实践。然而,该试验也发现使用倍他米松后新生儿低血糖的风险增加。这项随访研究的重点是晚期早产儿使用类固醇后的长期神经发育结局。目的评估晚期早产儿(34-36周)使用皮质类固醇是否会影响儿童神经发育结局。设计、设置和参与者对分娩父母参加了多中心随机临床试验的6岁或以上儿童进行前瞻性随访研究,该研究于2011-2016年在13个参与母胎医学单元(MFMU)网络周期的中心进行。随访时间为2017-2022年。暴露12毫克肌肉注射倍他米松,两次间隔24小时。主要结果和测量指标该随访研究的主要结果是第2版差异能力量表(DAS-II)中的一般概念能力得分低于85分(-1 SD)。次要结果包括粗大运动功能分类系统水平、社会反应量表和儿童行为检查表得分。多变量分析对已知与主要结果相关的预设变量进行了调整。结果 在2831名儿童中,有1026名注册,949名(479名倍他米松,470名安慰剂)完成了DAS-II,中位年龄为7岁(IQR,6.6-7.6岁)。除了倍他米松组的新生儿低血糖症更为常见外,各组的母亲、新生儿和儿童特征相似。主要结果是一般概念能力得分低于 85 分,倍他米松组 82 例(17.1%)与安慰剂组 87 例(18.5%)(调整后相对风险为 0.94;95% CI,0.73-1.22)没有差异。次要结果无差异。结论与相关性在这项随机临床试验的后续研究中,对有晚期早产风险的人群使用产前皮质类固醇最初被证明可改善新生儿短期呼吸系统的预后,但会增加低血糖的发生率,而这与6岁或6岁以上儿童神经发育的不良预后无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
With Nearsightedness in Children on the Rise, Experts Push for Outdoor Time, Disease Designation HHS Will Provide Free US-Made COVID-19 Tests to Households. Few Patients Receive Testing After Abnormal Urine Protein Results. Pertussis Cases Are Surging This Year-Here's Why. Study: MMR Vaccine Protection Wanes Slightly Over Time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1