Comparison of Two Types of Endometrial Scratch before Embryo Transfer and Patient-Reported Pain Scores: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: The impact of various methods of endometrial scratch during assisted reproductive technology (ART) is not well established. Objective: To compare patient-reported pain scores and ART outcomes following two types of endometrial scratch prior to embryo transfer. Study design: In this prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial, patients were assigned to either Pipelle or Shepard catheter. The primary outcome was mean pain score. Secondary outcomes included implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Results: One hundred seventy transfers were included (Pipelle: n=78, Shepard: n=92). Mean pain scores were significantly lower in the Shepard group compared to the Pipelle group (3.0±2.4 vs. 3.9±2.2, respectively; p=0.01). There was no significant difference in IR (Shepard: 59.7%±52 and Pipelle: 56.5%±48; p=0.9) and CPR (Shepard: 67.6%±47 and Pipelle: 71.8%±45; p=0.6). Conclusions: In our study, the Shepard catheter was a less painful method of endometrial scratch without compromising ART outcomes.