Development and evaluation of a stroke research Public Patient Involvement Panel

S. O'Reilly, A. Whiston, Eva Corbett, Amy O'Mahony, Molly X Manning, Pauline Boland, Katie Robinson, Rose Galvin, Joanna M Allardyce, Mike Butler, Jim Bradley, Jon Salsberg, Margaret O’Connor, Patricia Pond, Eva Murphy, Liam Glynn, N. Cunningham, Edel Hennessy, S. Hayes
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a stroke research Public Patient Involvement Panel","authors":"S. O'Reilly, A. Whiston, Eva Corbett, Amy O'Mahony, Molly X Manning, Pauline Boland, Katie Robinson, Rose Galvin, Joanna M Allardyce, Mike Butler, Jim Bradley, Jon Salsberg, Margaret O’Connor, Patricia Pond, Eva Murphy, Liam Glynn, N. Cunningham, Edel Hennessy, S. Hayes","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13838.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Public and patient involvement (PPI) is important in stroke research to ensure that research conducted reflects the priorities and needs of people after stroke. Several factors have been found to affect PPI, including location of the research and time requirements for participation. The incidence of stroke is rising, and can result in symptoms including fatigue, depression, and physical/cognitive impairments. Aims 1) Describe the development of a PPI advisory group and a healthcare professional advisory group for stroke rehabilitation research and 2) to explore the perspectives of the members of the PPI groups on being involved in the research process. Methods A stakeholder panel consisting of up to 20 people with stroke, members of the public and healthcare professionals will be formed. A pragmatic purposive sampling technique using snowball sampling will be used to recruit members. The PPI panel will meet four times and will be supported by the guidelines developed from the INVOLVE framework. The PPI panel will be involved as co-researchers in the conceptualisation of future stroke rehabilitation research, the delivery of such studies, the analysis and dissemination of findings. Following the development of the panel, we will conduct semi-structured focus groups to collect qualitative data, examining the perspectives of members. Separate focus groups will be held for people with stroke, family members/cares, and healthcare professionals/researchers. Data will be transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. This will result in a set of themes and subthemes describing participants' opinions and experience of being on a PPI panel in stroke rehabilitation research. Conclusions PPI is an essential part of research in stroke. Stakeholders can provide key insights into the research processes. The results of this qualitative study will provide insight into the barriers and enablers of their participation in PPI in stroke rehabilitation research.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13838.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Public and patient involvement (PPI) is important in stroke research to ensure that research conducted reflects the priorities and needs of people after stroke. Several factors have been found to affect PPI, including location of the research and time requirements for participation. The incidence of stroke is rising, and can result in symptoms including fatigue, depression, and physical/cognitive impairments. Aims 1) Describe the development of a PPI advisory group and a healthcare professional advisory group for stroke rehabilitation research and 2) to explore the perspectives of the members of the PPI groups on being involved in the research process. Methods A stakeholder panel consisting of up to 20 people with stroke, members of the public and healthcare professionals will be formed. A pragmatic purposive sampling technique using snowball sampling will be used to recruit members. The PPI panel will meet four times and will be supported by the guidelines developed from the INVOLVE framework. The PPI panel will be involved as co-researchers in the conceptualisation of future stroke rehabilitation research, the delivery of such studies, the analysis and dissemination of findings. Following the development of the panel, we will conduct semi-structured focus groups to collect qualitative data, examining the perspectives of members. Separate focus groups will be held for people with stroke, family members/cares, and healthcare professionals/researchers. Data will be transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis. This will result in a set of themes and subthemes describing participants' opinions and experience of being on a PPI panel in stroke rehabilitation research. Conclusions PPI is an essential part of research in stroke. Stakeholders can provide key insights into the research processes. The results of this qualitative study will provide insight into the barriers and enablers of their participation in PPI in stroke rehabilitation research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风研究公众患者参与小组的发展与评估
背景 公众和患者参与(PPI)在卒中研究中非常重要,可确保研究反映卒中患者的优先事项和需求。研究发现有几个因素会影响公众和患者参与,包括研究地点和参与时间要求。中风的发病率不断上升,可导致疲劳、抑郁、身体/认知障碍等症状。目的 1) 描述中风康复研究的公众参与咨询小组和医疗保健专业咨询小组的发展情况;2) 探讨公众参与小组成员对参与研究过程的看法。方法 将成立一个利益相关者小组,由多达 20 名中风患者、公众和医疗专业人员组成。将采用滚雪球抽样的实用目的性抽样技术招募成员。PPI 小组将召开四次会议,并将得到 INVOLVE 框架制定的指导原则的支持。PPI 小组将作为共同研究者参与未来中风康复研究的构思、研究的实施、研究结果的分析和传播。小组成立后,我们将开展半结构化焦点小组活动,收集定性数据,研究小组成员的观点。我们将分别为中风患者、家庭成员/护理人员、医疗保健专业人员/研究人员组织焦点小组。数据将通过布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法进行转录和分析。这将产生一组主题和次主题,描述参与者在中风康复研究中参加公众参与小组的意见和经验。结论 公众参与是脑卒中研究的重要组成部分。利益相关者可以为研究过程提供重要见解。本定性研究的结果将有助于深入了解他们参与卒中康复研究中患者参与小组的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1