Metal-for-Amber in the European Bronze Age

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Praehistorische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1515/pz-2024-2003
Helle Vandkilde, Clara Fischer Stephansen, P. Suchowska‐Ducke, L. Ahlqvist, Casper Skaaning Andersen, Louise Felding, Mathias Bjørnevad-Ahlqvist, Janusz Czebreszuk, H. W. Nørgaard
{"title":"Metal-for-Amber in the European Bronze Age","authors":"Helle Vandkilde, Clara Fischer Stephansen, P. Suchowska‐Ducke, L. Ahlqvist, Casper Skaaning Andersen, Louise Felding, Mathias Bjørnevad-Ahlqvist, Janusz Czebreszuk, H. W. Nørgaard","doi":"10.1515/pz-2024-2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Baltic amber is often considered the principal Scandinavian commodity exchanged for metal from ore-rich regions in Europe. If correct, this may explain the astonishing metal wealth of the Nordic Bronze Age and the modest social consumption of amber locally. The hypothesis of a metal-for-amber principle behind the trade is here for the first time assessed on scales from micro to macro. Amber finds were charted across Europe, and the result was then compared to evidence for regular shifts in copper ore preferences/availability, as found in the systematically changing isotopic/elemental composition of Nordic metal objects in c. 2100–1200 BC. Comparisons indicate that amber and metal followed similar spatiotemporal trajectories with major reorganizations at the turn from the Early to the Middle Bronze Age. Shifts in amber distribution correlate with the geography of metal sources used in both periods and flows of metal to Scandinavia and amber to Europe appear to be contingent even in subperiods. Major European amber tracks – and the crossroads hubs controlling them – were identified for the transfer of goods, yet again revealing major changes at the transition to the Middle Bronze Age. The social roles and meanings of amber among Nordic communities were likewise examined, suggesting that bearers of amber played a role in exercising social control of this resource. It is concluded that amber almost certainly was exchanged for metal.","PeriodicalId":44421,"journal":{"name":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2024-2003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Baltic amber is often considered the principal Scandinavian commodity exchanged for metal from ore-rich regions in Europe. If correct, this may explain the astonishing metal wealth of the Nordic Bronze Age and the modest social consumption of amber locally. The hypothesis of a metal-for-amber principle behind the trade is here for the first time assessed on scales from micro to macro. Amber finds were charted across Europe, and the result was then compared to evidence for regular shifts in copper ore preferences/availability, as found in the systematically changing isotopic/elemental composition of Nordic metal objects in c. 2100–1200 BC. Comparisons indicate that amber and metal followed similar spatiotemporal trajectories with major reorganizations at the turn from the Early to the Middle Bronze Age. Shifts in amber distribution correlate with the geography of metal sources used in both periods and flows of metal to Scandinavia and amber to Europe appear to be contingent even in subperiods. Major European amber tracks – and the crossroads hubs controlling them – were identified for the transfer of goods, yet again revealing major changes at the transition to the Middle Bronze Age. The social roles and meanings of amber among Nordic communities were likewise examined, suggesting that bearers of amber played a role in exercising social control of this resource. It is concluded that amber almost certainly was exchanged for metal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲青铜时代的金属换琥珀
波罗的海琥珀通常被认为是斯堪的纳维亚人从欧洲矿石丰富地区换取金属的主要商品。如果这一观点是正确的,那么就可以解释北欧青铜时代惊人的金属财富以及琥珀在当地的适度社会消费。这里首次对贸易背后的金属换琥珀原则假设进行了从微观到宏观的评估。对欧洲各地的琥珀出土情况进行了绘制,然后将绘制结果与公元前约 2100-1200 年北欧金属物品同位素/元素组成的系统变化中发现的铜矿偏好/可用性定期变化的证据进行了比较。比较结果表明,琥珀和金属的时空轨迹相似,在青铜时代早期到中期的转折时期都发生了重大重组。琥珀分布的变化与这两个时期所使用的金属来源的地理位置相关,即使在次时期,金属流向斯堪的纳维亚半岛和琥珀流向欧洲似乎也是偶然的。欧洲主要的琥珀运输路线--以及控制这些路线的十字路口--被确定为货物运输的枢纽,再次揭示了青铜时代中期过渡时期的重大变化。同样,还研究了琥珀在北欧社区中的社会角色和意义,这表明琥珀的携带者在行使对这一资源的社会控制方面发挥了作用。结论是,琥珀几乎肯定是用来交换金属的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Praehistorische Zeitschrift is regarded as one of the most renowned German publications in the area of Prehistory and Ancient History. In keeping with its traditional mission, it presents detailed accounts of the most recent research conducted in Europe. The geographical emphasis is placed on Eastern, South-Eastern and Northern Central Europe. A comprehensive review section deals with recent German and international monographs from the field of prehistoric archaeology. Contributions are published in German, English or French, with a brief abstract in the other two languages; if necessary, a summary is provided in the author"s native language.
期刊最新文献
Salt, clay, and society: Towards a reconstruction of salt-making chaînes opératoires in the Bronze and Early Iron Age in the Kraków–Wieliczka salt-bearing region Ein Nachruf auf Prof. Dr. Otto-Herman Frey (1.9.1929–4.4.2023) aus Sicht der slowenischen Archäologie Life on Pálava Hills in the Urnfield period through the perspective of a metal-detecting survey Votive, Spielzeug, Gussformen, oder …? Zu den bronzezeitlichen Miniaturgefäßen in Istrien (Kroatien) Where are the missing boatyards? Steaming pits as boat building sites in the Nordic Bronze Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1