Oral lasofoxifene's effects on moderate to severe vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: two phase 3, randomized, controlled trials.

R. Kagan, James A Simon, Steven R Goldstein, Barry S Komm, S. Jenkins, David J Portman
{"title":"Oral lasofoxifene's effects on moderate to severe vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: two phase 3, randomized, controlled trials.","authors":"R. Kagan, James A Simon, Steven R Goldstein, Barry S Komm, S. Jenkins, David J Portman","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe aim of this study was to demonstrate whether lasofoxifene improves vaginal signs/symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwo identical, phase 3 trials randomized postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vaginal symptoms to oral lasofoxifene 0.25 or 0.5 mg/d, or placebo, for 12 week. Changes from baseline to week 12 in most bothersome symptom, vaginal pH, and percentages of vaginal parabasal and superficial cells were evaluated. These coprimary endpoints were analyzed using analysis of covariance, except superficial cells, which were analyzed by the nonparametric, rank-based Kruskal-Wallis test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe two studies enrolled 444 and 445 women (mean age, ~60 y), respectively. Coprimary endpoints at week 12 improved with lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d greater than with placebo (P < 0.0125 for all). Study 1: most bothersome symptom (least square mean difference from placebo: -0.4 and -0.5 for 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d, respectively), vaginal pH (-0.65, -0.58), and vaginal superficial (5.2%, 5.4%), and parabasal (-39.9%, -34.9%) cells; study 2: most bothersome symptom (-0.4, -0.5), vaginal pH (-0.57, -0.67), and vaginal superficial (3.5%, 2.2%) and parabasal (-34.1%, -33.5%) cells. Some improvements occurred as early as week 2. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and hot flushes were most frequently reported (lasofoxifene vs placebo: 13%-23% vs 9%-11%). Serious adverse events were infrequent and no deaths occurred.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn two phase 3 trials, oral lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in vaginal signs/symptoms with a favorable safety profile, suggesting beneficial effects of lasofoxifene on genitourinary syndrome of menopause.","PeriodicalId":18404,"journal":{"name":"Menopause","volume":"36 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to demonstrate whether lasofoxifene improves vaginal signs/symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. METHODS Two identical, phase 3 trials randomized postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vaginal symptoms to oral lasofoxifene 0.25 or 0.5 mg/d, or placebo, for 12 week. Changes from baseline to week 12 in most bothersome symptom, vaginal pH, and percentages of vaginal parabasal and superficial cells were evaluated. These coprimary endpoints were analyzed using analysis of covariance, except superficial cells, which were analyzed by the nonparametric, rank-based Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS The two studies enrolled 444 and 445 women (mean age, ~60 y), respectively. Coprimary endpoints at week 12 improved with lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d greater than with placebo (P < 0.0125 for all). Study 1: most bothersome symptom (least square mean difference from placebo: -0.4 and -0.5 for 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d, respectively), vaginal pH (-0.65, -0.58), and vaginal superficial (5.2%, 5.4%), and parabasal (-39.9%, -34.9%) cells; study 2: most bothersome symptom (-0.4, -0.5), vaginal pH (-0.57, -0.67), and vaginal superficial (3.5%, 2.2%) and parabasal (-34.1%, -33.5%) cells. Some improvements occurred as early as week 2. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and hot flushes were most frequently reported (lasofoxifene vs placebo: 13%-23% vs 9%-11%). Serious adverse events were infrequent and no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS In two phase 3 trials, oral lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in vaginal signs/symptoms with a favorable safety profile, suggesting beneficial effects of lasofoxifene on genitourinary syndrome of menopause.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服拉索昔芬对绝经后妇女中度至重度阴道萎缩的影响:两项第 3 期随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在证明拉索昔芬是否能改善绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征的阴道体征/症状。方法:两项相同的 3 期试验将患有中度至重度阴道症状的绝经后妇女随机分组,让她们口服拉索昔芬 0.25 或 0.5 毫克/天或安慰剂,为期 12 周。试验评估了最令人烦恼的症状、阴道pH值以及阴道旁细胞和表层细胞百分比从基线到第12周的变化。这些主要终点均采用协方差分析法进行分析,表层细胞除外,采用非参数、基于秩的 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法进行分析。结果这两项研究分别招募了 444 名和 445 名妇女(平均年龄约 60 岁)。拉索昔芬 0.25 毫克/天和 0.5 毫克/天治疗第 12 周时,主要终点的改善程度均高于安慰剂(P < 0.0125)。研究 1:最令人烦恼的症状(与安慰剂的最小平方均差:0.25 和 0.5 mg/d 分别为 -0.4 和 -0.5)、阴道 pH 值(-0.65,-0.58)、阴道浅表症状(5.2%,5.4%)和副基底细胞(-39.9%,-34.9%);研究 2:最令人烦恼的症状(-0.4,-0.5)、阴道 pH 值(-0.57,-0.67)、阴道表层细胞(3.5%,2.2%)和副基底细胞(-34.1%,-33.5%)。一些改善最早出现在第 2 周。大多数治疗中出现的不良反应为轻度或中度,最常见的是潮热(拉索昔芬与安慰剂相比:13%-23% 与 9%-11%)。结论 在两项3期试验中,口服拉索昔芬0.25和0.5毫克/天可显著改善阴道体征/症状,且具有临床意义,同时安全性良好,表明拉索昔芬对更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The development and evaluation of a fact sheet resource for women managing menopausal-related cognitive complaints. Survey of patient experience and management of vasomotor symptoms due to menopause from the PatientsLikeMe community. Effects of mind-body exercise on perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The association of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the severity of menopause symptoms: a study of 68,864 women. Oral lasofoxifene's effects on moderate to severe vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: two phase 3, randomized, controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1