Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy

Q3 Medicine Genij Ortopedii Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-301-308
K. I. Novikov, E. S. Komarova, S. V. Kolesnikov, O. V. Klimov, K. S. Sergeev
{"title":"Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy","authors":"K. I. Novikov, E. S. Komarova, S. V. Kolesnikov, O. V. Klimov, K. S. Sergeev","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-301-308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Limb length discrepancy (LLD) can be debilitating and may cause other medical and social problems. LLD is a serious physical condition and have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life changing the gait, forming pathological adaptive mechanisms and causing long-term musculoskeletal disturbances in children. The objective was to analyze the evolution of tactical approaches to the rehabilitation of patients with lower limb length inequality.Material and methods The original literature search was conducted on key resources including Scientific Electronic Library (www.elibrary.ru) and the National Library of Medicine (www.pubmed.org). Literature searches included both Russian and English studies. The search strategy was comprised of keywords: lower limbs, limb length inequality, approaches and means of limb length correction, osteosynthesis. Clinical guidelines, clinical recommendations, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and multicenter cohort studies were selected for analysis.Results and discussion Normal individuals can often experience a difference in the length of the lower limbs from several mm to 1.5 cm and have no effect on the gait, condition of adjacent joints and joints of the opposite limb. Some authors report inequality of 5 mm leading to orthopaedic pathology. A variety of  conservative and  surgical treatments are offered for limb length equalization. Elimination of LLD is a  common and  unresolved medical problem. Conservative treatment of LLD can be considered as one of  the  stages of rehabilitation. Some patients can benefit from conservative treatments. Alternatively, surgical equalization is a treatment option for patients with LLD.Conclusion Surgical methods offered earlier to address LLD had disadvantages, which ultimately minimized their use, and orthopaedic surgeons abandoned some of them due to the high risk of severe complications. The device and the technique developed by Dr. Ilizarov in the 50s of the last century was an epoch-making event in the elimination of LLD and are constantly being improved.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-301-308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Limb length discrepancy (LLD) can be debilitating and may cause other medical and social problems. LLD is a serious physical condition and have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life changing the gait, forming pathological adaptive mechanisms and causing long-term musculoskeletal disturbances in children. The objective was to analyze the evolution of tactical approaches to the rehabilitation of patients with lower limb length inequality.Material and methods The original literature search was conducted on key resources including Scientific Electronic Library (www.elibrary.ru) and the National Library of Medicine (www.pubmed.org). Literature searches included both Russian and English studies. The search strategy was comprised of keywords: lower limbs, limb length inequality, approaches and means of limb length correction, osteosynthesis. Clinical guidelines, clinical recommendations, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and multicenter cohort studies were selected for analysis.Results and discussion Normal individuals can often experience a difference in the length of the lower limbs from several mm to 1.5 cm and have no effect on the gait, condition of adjacent joints and joints of the opposite limb. Some authors report inequality of 5 mm leading to orthopaedic pathology. A variety of  conservative and  surgical treatments are offered for limb length equalization. Elimination of LLD is a  common and  unresolved medical problem. Conservative treatment of LLD can be considered as one of  the  stages of rehabilitation. Some patients can benefit from conservative treatments. Alternatively, surgical equalization is a treatment option for patients with LLD.Conclusion Surgical methods offered earlier to address LLD had disadvantages, which ultimately minimized their use, and orthopaedic surgeons abandoned some of them due to the high risk of severe complications. The device and the technique developed by Dr. Ilizarov in the 50s of the last century was an epoch-making event in the elimination of LLD and are constantly being improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除肢长不一致战术方法的演变
导言 肢长不等(LLD)会使人衰弱,并可能引发其他医疗和社会问题。肢长不等是一种严重的身体状况,对患者的生活质量有重大影响,会改变步态,形成病态适应机制,并对儿童造成长期的肌肉骨骼障碍。研究目的是分析下肢长度不等患者康复战术方法的演变。材料和方法 在科学电子图书馆(www.elibrary.ru)和国家医学图书馆(www.pubmed.org)等重要资源上进行原始文献检索。文献检索包括俄文和英文研究。搜索策略包括关键词:下肢、肢体长度不等、肢体长度矫正的方法和手段、骨合成。结果与讨论 正常人的下肢长度通常相差几毫米到 1.5 厘米,但对步态、邻近关节和对侧肢体关节的状况没有影响。一些学者报告说,不等长达 5 毫米会导致骨科病变。有多种保守和手术治疗方法可用于肢体长度均衡。消除肢长不等是一个常见且尚未解决的医学问题。肢长不等的保守治疗可视为康复治疗的一个阶段。一些患者可以从保守治疗中获益。另外,手术均衡化也是 LLD 患者的一种治疗选择。结论 早先为解决 LLD 而提供的手术方法存在一些缺点,最终导致其使用率降至最低,骨科医生也因严重并发症的高风险而放弃了其中的一些方法。伊利扎罗夫医生在上世纪 50 年代开发的设备和技术在消除 LLD 方面具有划时代的意义,并在不断改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement Orthopaedic complications of hemiparetic forms of cerebral palsy: problems of the lower extremities (literature review) Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy Current state of the treatment problem in the patients with elbow joint contractures due to ossification Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1