Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly: an untapped setting for research to advance pain care in older persons

C. Riffin, Lauren Mei, Lilla A Brody, Keela Herr, Karl A. Pillemer, M. C. Reid
{"title":"Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly: an untapped setting for research to advance pain care in older persons","authors":"C. Riffin, Lauren Mei, Lilla A Brody, Keela Herr, Karl A. Pillemer, M. C. Reid","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1347473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a community-based care model in the United States that provides comprehensive health and social services to frail, nursing home-eligible adults aged 55 years and older. PACE organizations aim to support adequate pain control in their participants, yet few evidence-based pain interventions have been adopted or integrated into this setting. This article provides a roadmap for researchers who are interested in collaborating with PACE organizations to embed and evaluate evidence-based pain tools and interventions. We situate our discussion within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a meta-theoretical framework that considers multi-level influences to implementation and evaluation of evidence-based programs. Within each CFIR domain, we identify key factors informed by our own work that merit consideration by research teams and PACE collaborators. Inner setting components pertain to the organizational culture of each PACE organization, the type and quality of electronic health record data, and availability of staff to assist with data abstraction. Outer setting components include external policies and regulations by the National PACE Association and audits conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which have implications for research participant recruitment and enrollment. Individual-level characteristics of PACE organization leaders include their receptivity toward new innovations and perceived ability to implement them. Forming and sustaining research-PACE partnerships to deliver evidence-based pain interventions pain will require attention to multi-level factors that may influence future uptake and provides a way to improve the health and well-being of patients served by these programs.","PeriodicalId":12641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pain Research","volume":"68 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1347473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a community-based care model in the United States that provides comprehensive health and social services to frail, nursing home-eligible adults aged 55 years and older. PACE organizations aim to support adequate pain control in their participants, yet few evidence-based pain interventions have been adopted or integrated into this setting. This article provides a roadmap for researchers who are interested in collaborating with PACE organizations to embed and evaluate evidence-based pain tools and interventions. We situate our discussion within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a meta-theoretical framework that considers multi-level influences to implementation and evaluation of evidence-based programs. Within each CFIR domain, we identify key factors informed by our own work that merit consideration by research teams and PACE collaborators. Inner setting components pertain to the organizational culture of each PACE organization, the type and quality of electronic health record data, and availability of staff to assist with data abstraction. Outer setting components include external policies and regulations by the National PACE Association and audits conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which have implications for research participant recruitment and enrollment. Individual-level characteristics of PACE organization leaders include their receptivity toward new innovations and perceived ability to implement them. Forming and sustaining research-PACE partnerships to deliver evidence-based pain interventions pain will require attention to multi-level factors that may influence future uptake and provides a way to improve the health and well-being of patients served by these programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人全包护理计划:促进老年人疼痛护理研究的未开发环境
老年人全包护理计划(PACE)是美国一种基于社区的护理模式,为 55 岁及以上符合养老院条件的体弱成年人提供全面的健康和社会服务。PACE 组织旨在支持参与者充分控制疼痛,但很少有循证疼痛干预措施被采用或整合到这一环境中。本文为有兴趣与 PACE 机构合作的研究人员提供了一个路线图,以嵌入和评估循证疼痛工具和干预措施。我们将讨论置于 "实施研究综合框架"(CFIR)中,这是一个元理论框架,考虑了对循证项目实施和评估的多层次影响。在 CFIR 的各个领域中,我们根据自己的工作确定了值得研究团队和 PACE 合作者考虑的关键因素。内部环境因素涉及每个 PACE 机构的组织文化、电子健康记录数据的类型和质量,以及是否有员工协助进行数据抽取。外部环境因素包括国家 PACE 协会的外部政策和法规,以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心进行的审计,这些因素对研究参与者的招募和注册都有影响。PACE 组织领导者的个人特征包括他们对新创新的接受程度以及实施新创新的能力。要形成并维持研究与 PACE 的合作关系,以提供循证疼痛干预措施,就需要关注可能影响未来吸收的多层次因素,并为改善这些计划所服务的患者的健康和福祉提供一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrauterine transfusion under fetal analgesia: the evaluation of perinatal outcomes Preserved tactile distance estimation despite body representation distortions in individuals with fibromyalgia The effect of dysmenorrhea severity and interference on reactions to experimentally-induced pain Co-producing research study recruitment strategies with and for children and young people for paediatric chronic pain studies A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blue light device for the treatment of chronic back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1