Co-producing research study recruitment strategies with and for children and young people for paediatric chronic pain studies

Daniela Ghio, Laura E. Lunt, Angharad Bridges, Lydia Gahr, Anna M. Hood
{"title":"Co-producing research study recruitment strategies with and for children and young people for paediatric chronic pain studies","authors":"Daniela Ghio, Laura E. Lunt, Angharad Bridges, Lydia Gahr, Anna M. Hood","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1358509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children and young people experiencing chronic pain are at greater risk of inequitable and poor-quality pain management, which has implications for future management of pain in adulthood. Most chronic pain research is conducted with adults who are more likely to be middle-class, white and monocultured. Inclusive and diverse recruitment practices in paediatric pain research can be an area in which we can address this imbalance of representation. The aim of this current work was to explore these practices and to co-produce recommendations regarding recruitment strategies for paediatric pain research.The research team worked with Your Rheum, a United Kingdom young person's advisory group (ages 11–24 years) and diagnosed with rheumatic condition(s), the opportunity to input into rheumatology research. At a virtual Your Rheum meeting, eight young people (female = 7, male = 1, age range 12–24) took part in group discussions, sharing their experiences of taking part in research and their decision process. Online tools, including Mentimeter and Miro, were used to aid conversations and share ideas.Most young people had experience of taking part in research as a study participant (n = 5). Recommendations synthesised included increased awareness of research in general. The young people discussed being open to hearing about research opportunities; they reflected that they are rarely exposed to these invitations or hear about current research. The clinic environment was highlighted as a “good and trustworthy” recruitment area – being approached by a member of the research team was considered ideal, even if it was someone they had not met previously. Many young people recalled little discussions of research at their clinical appointments. Deciding to participate in research included the following considerations: benefit/impact; connecting with others; research topic; which is then balanced against convenience, and reimbursement. The young people felt that taking part in research was empowering and helped them take ownership of their pain management.It is essential to understand the perspectives of potential study participants, to plan successful recruitment strategies. Ensuring we consider these factors when designing our studies and recruitment strategies is beneficial to all involved. Co-produced recruitment strategies would aid inclusive (and increased) research participation.","PeriodicalId":12641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pain Research","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1358509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children and young people experiencing chronic pain are at greater risk of inequitable and poor-quality pain management, which has implications for future management of pain in adulthood. Most chronic pain research is conducted with adults who are more likely to be middle-class, white and monocultured. Inclusive and diverse recruitment practices in paediatric pain research can be an area in which we can address this imbalance of representation. The aim of this current work was to explore these practices and to co-produce recommendations regarding recruitment strategies for paediatric pain research.The research team worked with Your Rheum, a United Kingdom young person's advisory group (ages 11–24 years) and diagnosed with rheumatic condition(s), the opportunity to input into rheumatology research. At a virtual Your Rheum meeting, eight young people (female = 7, male = 1, age range 12–24) took part in group discussions, sharing their experiences of taking part in research and their decision process. Online tools, including Mentimeter and Miro, were used to aid conversations and share ideas.Most young people had experience of taking part in research as a study participant (n = 5). Recommendations synthesised included increased awareness of research in general. The young people discussed being open to hearing about research opportunities; they reflected that they are rarely exposed to these invitations or hear about current research. The clinic environment was highlighted as a “good and trustworthy” recruitment area – being approached by a member of the research team was considered ideal, even if it was someone they had not met previously. Many young people recalled little discussions of research at their clinical appointments. Deciding to participate in research included the following considerations: benefit/impact; connecting with others; research topic; which is then balanced against convenience, and reimbursement. The young people felt that taking part in research was empowering and helped them take ownership of their pain management.It is essential to understand the perspectives of potential study participants, to plan successful recruitment strategies. Ensuring we consider these factors when designing our studies and recruitment strategies is beneficial to all involved. Co-produced recruitment strategies would aid inclusive (and increased) research participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科慢性疼痛研究中,与儿童和青少年共同制定研究招募战略,并为他们制定招募战略
经历慢性疼痛的儿童和青少年更容易受到不公平和低质量的疼痛治疗,这对他们成年后的疼痛治疗有影响。大多数慢性疼痛研究都是针对成年人进行的,他们更有可能是中产阶级、白人和单一文化背景的人。在儿科疼痛研究中,包容性和多元化的招募实践可以解决这种代表性不平衡的问题。目前这项工作的目的是探索这些做法,并共同提出有关儿科疼痛研究招募策略的建议。研究团队与英国年轻人咨询团体 "Your Rheum"(11-24 岁)合作,该团体被诊断患有风湿病,他们有机会为风湿病学研究献计献策。在 "你的风湿 "虚拟会议上,8 名年轻人(女性 7 人,男性 1 人,年龄在 12-24 岁之间)参加了小组讨论,分享了他们参与研究的经历和决策过程。大多数年轻人都有作为研究参与者参与研究的经历(n = 5)。总结出的建议包括提高对研究的总体认识。年轻人讨论了是否愿意听取有关研究机会的意见;他们反映说,他们很少受到这些邀请,也很少听到有关当前研究的信息。他们强调,诊所环境是一个 "良好且值得信赖 "的招聘场所--研究小组成员与他们接触被认为是最理想的,即使是他们以前从未见过的人。许多年轻人回忆说,他们在门诊就诊时很少讨论研究问题。决定参与研究包括以下考虑因素:益处/影响;与他人的联系;研究课题;然后在方便性和报销之间进行权衡。年轻人认为参与研究能够增强他们的能力,帮助他们掌握疼痛治疗的主动权。确保我们在设计研究和招募策略时考虑到这些因素对所有参与者都有好处。共同制定的招募策略将有助于包容性(和更多)的研究参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrauterine transfusion under fetal analgesia: the evaluation of perinatal outcomes Preserved tactile distance estimation despite body representation distortions in individuals with fibromyalgia The effect of dysmenorrhea severity and interference on reactions to experimentally-induced pain Co-producing research study recruitment strategies with and for children and young people for paediatric chronic pain studies A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blue light device for the treatment of chronic back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1