Developing Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammatical Knowledge: Insights from Spaced versus Massed Instruction

Hossein Kargar Behbahani, Mansoor Ali Darazi, Lakshmi Kumari R
{"title":"Developing Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammatical Knowledge: Insights from Spaced versus Massed Instruction","authors":"Hossein Kargar Behbahani, Mansoor Ali Darazi, Lakshmi Kumari R","doi":"10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite grammar receiving greater emphasis than other language skills in Iranian schools, Iranian EFL students encounter challenges in acquiring the linguistic structures they are exposed to, resulting in insufficient grammar knowledge. This experiment looked into the effects of spaced versus massed instruction on learning modal auxiliaries among Iranian EFL learners with a lower-intermediate command of English. To this end, through an Oxford Quick Placement Tests (OQPT), 78 lower-intermediate learners were selected and assigned in three conditions, with 26 subjects in each: Spaced condition, Massed condition, Control condition. Using a Levene’s test, it was shown that the subjects were homogenous prior to the experiment. Then, a pretest was used. The results of the pretest showed that there was no between groups’ difference prior to the treatment. Afterward, the spaced group received three 30-minute sessions on modal auxiliaries based on Fundamentals of English Grammar by Azar (2016), while the massed condition received the instruction in just a single 90-minute session. The subjects in all conditions were then posttested. The results of a one-way between groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that both treatment groups outperformed the comparison group (p < .05) with a large effect size (eta squared = .63). The results of post-hoc analyzes using Bonferroni adjustment further revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two experimental conditions (p < .05). That is, the spaced subjects gained more compared to their massed counterparts with regard to the targeted L2 form. Pedagogically, this study suggests ESL/EFL instructors could integrate spaced instruction strategies for enhancing students' proficiency in modals. Material developers may also leverage these findings to create more engaging and effective instructional materials.","PeriodicalId":33956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","volume":"38 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite grammar receiving greater emphasis than other language skills in Iranian schools, Iranian EFL students encounter challenges in acquiring the linguistic structures they are exposed to, resulting in insufficient grammar knowledge. This experiment looked into the effects of spaced versus massed instruction on learning modal auxiliaries among Iranian EFL learners with a lower-intermediate command of English. To this end, through an Oxford Quick Placement Tests (OQPT), 78 lower-intermediate learners were selected and assigned in three conditions, with 26 subjects in each: Spaced condition, Massed condition, Control condition. Using a Levene’s test, it was shown that the subjects were homogenous prior to the experiment. Then, a pretest was used. The results of the pretest showed that there was no between groups’ difference prior to the treatment. Afterward, the spaced group received three 30-minute sessions on modal auxiliaries based on Fundamentals of English Grammar by Azar (2016), while the massed condition received the instruction in just a single 90-minute session. The subjects in all conditions were then posttested. The results of a one-way between groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that both treatment groups outperformed the comparison group (p < .05) with a large effect size (eta squared = .63). The results of post-hoc analyzes using Bonferroni adjustment further revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two experimental conditions (p < .05). That is, the spaced subjects gained more compared to their massed counterparts with regard to the targeted L2 form. Pedagogically, this study suggests ESL/EFL instructors could integrate spaced instruction strategies for enhancing students' proficiency in modals. Material developers may also leverage these findings to create more engaging and effective instructional materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展伊朗 EFL 学习者的语法知识:间隔教学与大规模教学的启示
尽管语法在伊朗学校中比其他语言技能更受重视,但伊朗的 EFL 学生在掌握所接触的语言结构方面遇到了挑战,导致语法知识不足。本实验研究了间隔教学与大规模教学对英语水平中下的伊朗 EFL 学习者学习模态助词的影响。为此,通过牛津快速分级测试(OQPT),选取了 78 名中低级英语学习者,并将他们分配到三种条件下,每种条件下有 26 名受试者:间隔条件、集中条件和对照条件。通过 Levene 检验表明,受试者在实验前是同质的。然后,进行了一次前测。前测结果显示,在治疗前,组间没有差异。之后,间隔组根据 Azar(2016 年)所著的《英语语法基础》接受了三节 30 分钟的模态助词教学,而大量组只接受了一节 90 分钟的教学。然后对所有条件下的受试者进行了后测。单向组间方差分析(ANOVA)结果显示,两个治疗组的成绩均优于对比组(p < .05),且效应大小较大(eta 平方 = .63)。使用 Bonferroni 调整进行的事后分析结果进一步表明,两种实验条件之间存在显著的统计学差异(p < .05)。也就是说,在目标 L2 形式方面,有间距的受试者比无间距的受试者收获更大。在教学方面,本研究表明,ESL/EFL 教师可以结合间隔教学策略来提高学生的模态熟练程度。教材编写者也可以利用这些发现来编写更吸引人、更有效的教材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Video Strategy as Scaffolding to Foster Students’ Grammar Proficiency and Writing Skills in EFL Learning Digital Peer Feedback and Students’ Critical Thinking: What Correlation and to What Extent? Translate Self-Review (TSR) Method Based on Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) for Arabic Writing Learning in Higher Education The Representation of the Indonesian Government in Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Rempang Island Conflict Computer-Based Technology on Writing Performance: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1