Evaluation of Implicit Bias Training in Continuing Medical and Nursing Education to Address Racial Bias in Maternity Health Care Settings.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Reports Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1177/00333549241245271
Kathryn E Mishkin, Chasmine Flax
{"title":"Evaluation of Implicit Bias Training in Continuing Medical and Nursing Education to Address Racial Bias in Maternity Health Care Settings.","authors":"Kathryn E Mishkin, Chasmine Flax","doi":"10.1177/00333549241245271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nImplicit bias can affect clinical decisions that influence the care received by patients whose ancestors had been subjected to unfair medical and social practices. However, literature describing the effects of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical and nursing education is scarce. We conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a training for maternal health care clinical and nonclinical staff.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA total of 80 staff members at 2 clinical sites in Cleveland, Ohio, participated in the training and evaluation in 2020 and 2021. We used a mixed-methods evaluation to capture changes in knowledge, awareness of bias, and application of strategies to reduce biased behavior by conducting pre- and posttraining surveys immediately after training and interviews at 3 and 6 months posttraining. We conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of the surveys and recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews for themes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nUsing a threshold of answering 3 of 5 knowledge questions correctly, 50 of 80 (62.5%) trainees who engaged in the evaluation passed the pretraining knowledge questions and 67 (83.8%) passed the posttraining knowledge questions. Of the 80 participants, 75 (93.8%) were women. Interviewees (n = 11) said that low staff-to-patient ratios, lack of racial and ethnic diversity in leadership, inadequate training on implicit bias, and lack of institutional consequences for poor behavior exacerbated bias in maternity care. Interviewees reported having heightened awareness of bias and feeling more empowered after the training to advocate for themselves and patients to prevent and mitigate bias in the hospital.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAdditional study describing the effect of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical education should be conducted, and administrative and management changes should also be made to prevent bias and improve quality of care.","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241245271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Implicit bias can affect clinical decisions that influence the care received by patients whose ancestors had been subjected to unfair medical and social practices. However, literature describing the effects of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical and nursing education is scarce. We conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a training for maternal health care clinical and nonclinical staff. METHODS A total of 80 staff members at 2 clinical sites in Cleveland, Ohio, participated in the training and evaluation in 2020 and 2021. We used a mixed-methods evaluation to capture changes in knowledge, awareness of bias, and application of strategies to reduce biased behavior by conducting pre- and posttraining surveys immediately after training and interviews at 3 and 6 months posttraining. We conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of the surveys and recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews for themes. RESULTS Using a threshold of answering 3 of 5 knowledge questions correctly, 50 of 80 (62.5%) trainees who engaged in the evaluation passed the pretraining knowledge questions and 67 (83.8%) passed the posttraining knowledge questions. Of the 80 participants, 75 (93.8%) were women. Interviewees (n = 11) said that low staff-to-patient ratios, lack of racial and ethnic diversity in leadership, inadequate training on implicit bias, and lack of institutional consequences for poor behavior exacerbated bias in maternity care. Interviewees reported having heightened awareness of bias and feeling more empowered after the training to advocate for themselves and patients to prevent and mitigate bias in the hospital. CONCLUSION Additional study describing the effect of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical education should be conducted, and administrative and management changes should also be made to prevent bias and improve quality of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医学和护理继续教育中的隐性偏见培训,以解决孕产妇医疗保健环境中的种族偏见问题。
目的隐性偏见会影响临床决策,从而影响祖辈曾遭受不公平医疗和社会行为的患者所接受的护理。然而,描述作为继续医学和护理教育一部分的隐性偏见培训效果的文献很少。方法俄亥俄州克利夫兰市的 2 个临床机构共 80 名工作人员参加了 2020 年和 2021 年的培训和评估。我们采用混合方法进行评估,通过在培训后立即进行培训前和培训后调查,以及在培训后 3 个月和 6 个月进行访谈,来了解员工在知识、偏见意识以及减少偏见行为策略应用方面的变化。我们对调查问卷进行了单变量和双变量分析,并对访谈进行了录音、转录和主题分析。结果以正确回答 5 个知识问题中的 3 个为临界值,参与评估的 80 名学员中有 50 人(62.5%)通过了培训前知识问题的测试,67 人(83.8%)通过了培训后知识问题的测试。在 80 名学员中,75 人(93.8%)为女性。受访者(n = 11)表示,员工与患者的比例过低、领导层缺乏种族和民族多样性、对隐性偏见的培训不足以及缺乏对不良行为的制度性后果,加剧了产科护理中的偏见。受访者表示,培训后他们提高了对偏见的认识,并感觉自己更有能力为自己和患者争取权益,以防止和减少医院中的偏见。结论:应开展更多研究,描述作为继续医学教育一部分的隐性偏见培训的效果,同时还应进行行政和管理改革,以防止偏见并提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
期刊最新文献
Wastewater Surveillance of US Coast Guard Installations and Seagoing Military Vessels to Mitigate the Risk of COVID-19 Outbreaks, March 2021-August 2022. Advancing Evidence-Based Public Health Policy: How Core Component Thinking Can Illuminate the Multilevel Nature of Public Health Policy. Associations Between Social Networks and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in 4 Rural Alabama Counties: Survey Findings. Community Engagement, Equity, and Cross-Sector Public Health Practice. Disparities in Smoking and Heavy Drinking Behaviors by Disability Status and Age of Disability Onset: Secondary Analysis of National Health Interview Survey Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1