Extensive Reading Principles Implementation: Pleasure vs Pressure

Wiwiet Eva Savitri, Utami Widiati, N. Suryati, Francisca Maria Ivone
{"title":"Extensive Reading Principles Implementation: Pleasure vs Pressure","authors":"Wiwiet Eva Savitri, Utami Widiati, N. Suryati, Francisca Maria Ivone","doi":"10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive reading (ER) should be implemented properly based on ER principles. The most known ER principles is ten ER principles proposed by Bamford and Day that are widely referred by ER practitioners around the globe. Unfortunately, these principles are not always implemented in ER classes, even in ELT study program in university. Related to it, ER classes in a university in Indonesia were reported to not conducted ER enthusiastically. It was suspected that it occurred because of lecturers’ confusion on what to do in their ER classes due to their insufficient comprehension of ER and its principles which eventually reduce pleasure which supposed to be existing in ER classes. Based on that suspicion, this study focused on investigating the lecturers’ familiarity on ER principles and the implementation of ER principles regarding the expectation to conduct pleasurable ER classes. The data were collected through in-dept interviews to lecturers and questionnaire to students. This study found that not all of the lecturers have adequate knowledge on ER principles which eventually hindered them to teach ER properly and pleasurably. It was also revealed that pressure was felt by both students and lecturers. The pressure increased when the ER involved rigid assignment and assessment.","PeriodicalId":33956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","volume":"36 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive reading (ER) should be implemented properly based on ER principles. The most known ER principles is ten ER principles proposed by Bamford and Day that are widely referred by ER practitioners around the globe. Unfortunately, these principles are not always implemented in ER classes, even in ELT study program in university. Related to it, ER classes in a university in Indonesia were reported to not conducted ER enthusiastically. It was suspected that it occurred because of lecturers’ confusion on what to do in their ER classes due to their insufficient comprehension of ER and its principles which eventually reduce pleasure which supposed to be existing in ER classes. Based on that suspicion, this study focused on investigating the lecturers’ familiarity on ER principles and the implementation of ER principles regarding the expectation to conduct pleasurable ER classes. The data were collected through in-dept interviews to lecturers and questionnaire to students. This study found that not all of the lecturers have adequate knowledge on ER principles which eventually hindered them to teach ER properly and pleasurably. It was also revealed that pressure was felt by both students and lecturers. The pressure increased when the ER involved rigid assignment and assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广泛阅读原则的实施:快乐与压力
广泛阅读(ER)应根据ER原则正确实施。最广为人知的广泛阅读原则是 Bamford 和 Day 提出的十项广泛阅读原则,这些原则被全球广泛阅读实践者所借鉴。遗憾的是,即使在大学的英语语言教学研究课程中,这些原则也并非总能在ER课程中得到贯彻。与此相关的是,据报道,印度尼西亚一所大学的对外汉语教学课堂并不热衷于开展对外汉语教学。据怀疑,出现这种情况的原因是讲师们对ER及其原则的理解不够,不知道在ER课堂上应该做些什么,最终降低了ER课堂上本应存在的愉悦感。基于这种怀疑,本研究重点调查了讲师对ER原则的熟悉程度,以及在期望开展愉悦的ER课堂方面对ER原则的执行情况。研究通过对讲师的内部访谈和对学生的问卷调查收集数据。研究发现,并非所有讲师都充分了解 ER 原则,这最终阻碍了他们正确、愉快地讲授 ER 课程。研究还发现,学生和讲师都感受到了压力。当企业资源规划涉及严格的作业和评估时,压力就会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Video Strategy as Scaffolding to Foster Students’ Grammar Proficiency and Writing Skills in EFL Learning Digital Peer Feedback and Students’ Critical Thinking: What Correlation and to What Extent? Translate Self-Review (TSR) Method Based on Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) for Arabic Writing Learning in Higher Education The Representation of the Indonesian Government in Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Rempang Island Conflict Computer-Based Technology on Writing Performance: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1