Perceptions and Controversies on Cholera in Traditional Chinese Medicine Field in Late Qing Dynasty

Shiqiang Guo, Haohuan WU, Yinghua Wu
{"title":"Perceptions and Controversies on Cholera in Traditional Chinese Medicine Field in Late Qing Dynasty","authors":"Shiqiang Guo, Haohuan WU, Yinghua Wu","doi":"10.1097/mc9.0000000000000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n At the beginning of the initial cholera outbreak in China, Wang Qingren (王清任), after years of clinical trials, became an early representative who discovered the infectious characteristics and observed the course of cholera in the field of traditional Chinesse medicine (TCM). Later, Kou Langao (寇兰皋) and Xu Zimo (徐子默), both medical practitioners, constructed a diagnosis and treatment system for cholera with cold patterns under the theory of typhoid. They represented \"School of Cholera with Cold Patterns\" (SCCP). In the 1860s, with the influence of Wang Shixiong’s (王士雄) studies on the nature of cholera under the theory of epidemic febrile disease, the \"School of Cholera with Heated Patterns\" (SCHP) prevailed thereafter. The two schools complemented each other in theories and contributed to the integrity of TCM in cholera diagnosis and treatment. By reviewing previous literature, books, clinical cases, and historical materials in medical field, this article aims 1) to summarise the influence TCM on the perception development towards cholera in the late Qing dynasty; 2) to explore the origin of the controversy between SCCP and SCHP from historical evidence; 3) to summarize the historical lessons from the debate over cholera in TCM based on the principle of treatment based on pattern identification, and offer suggestions for the current prevention and treatment of new diseases using TCM.\n","PeriodicalId":56671,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medicine and Culture","volume":"122 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medicine and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/mc9.0000000000000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the beginning of the initial cholera outbreak in China, Wang Qingren (王清任), after years of clinical trials, became an early representative who discovered the infectious characteristics and observed the course of cholera in the field of traditional Chinesse medicine (TCM). Later, Kou Langao (寇兰皋) and Xu Zimo (徐子默), both medical practitioners, constructed a diagnosis and treatment system for cholera with cold patterns under the theory of typhoid. They represented "School of Cholera with Cold Patterns" (SCCP). In the 1860s, with the influence of Wang Shixiong’s (王士雄) studies on the nature of cholera under the theory of epidemic febrile disease, the "School of Cholera with Heated Patterns" (SCHP) prevailed thereafter. The two schools complemented each other in theories and contributed to the integrity of TCM in cholera diagnosis and treatment. By reviewing previous literature, books, clinical cases, and historical materials in medical field, this article aims 1) to summarise the influence TCM on the perception development towards cholera in the late Qing dynasty; 2) to explore the origin of the controversy between SCCP and SCHP from historical evidence; 3) to summarize the historical lessons from the debate over cholera in TCM based on the principle of treatment based on pattern identification, and offer suggestions for the current prevention and treatment of new diseases using TCM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚清中医界对霍乱的认识与争议
中国霍乱爆发之初,王清任经过多年的临床实践,成为较早发现霍乱传染特点、观察霍乱病程的中医代表。后来,寇兰皋和徐子默两位医家在伤寒论的理论指导下,构建了霍乱寒证的辨证论治体系。他们是 "伤寒霍乱学派"(SCCP)的代表人物。19 世纪 60 年代,受王士雄在流行性发热病理论下对霍乱本质研究的影响,"热型霍乱学派 "盛行。两派在理论上相互补充,促进了中医在霍乱诊治方面的完整性。本文通过对以往文献、书籍、临床病例、医学史料的梳理,旨在:1)总结清末民初中医对霍乱认识发展的影响;2)从史料中探寻 "热型霍乱学派 "与 "热型霍乱学派 "之争的渊源;3)根据辨证论治的原则,总结中医霍乱之争的历史教训,为当前中医药防治新病提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
211
期刊最新文献
Curved Spine: The Shape of Spine in Taoist Body Diagrams and Its Influence on Medical Body Diagrams The “Ukiyo” of Moxibustion Reflected in the Ukiyo-e Perceptions and Controversies on Cholera in Traditional Chinese Medicine Field in Late Qing Dynasty Feasibility and Challenges of Interactive AI for Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Example of ChatGPT The Value of Traditional Medicine should not be Underestimated—Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1