Parent and Child Experiences of Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Unilateral Microtia–Atresia: Decisions and Outcomes

Lindsey Edwards, Laura Middleton-Curran, Gillian Wright, Natasha Rooney, Anita Wong, Rebecca Hill, Neil Bulstrode, Robert Nash
{"title":"Parent and Child Experiences of Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Unilateral Microtia–Atresia: Decisions and Outcomes","authors":"Lindsey Edwards, Laura Middleton-Curran, Gillian Wright, Natasha Rooney, Anita Wong, Rebecca Hill, Neil Bulstrode, Robert Nash","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The decision to proceed with bone-conduction hearing devices is not an easy one despite being the audiological management of choice for the majority of children with unilateral hearing loss secondary to microtia–atresia, and the outcome is not always as hoped for. This study aimed to explore parent and child views on decision making and outcomes.\n \n \n \n Qualitative methods (focus groups and individual interviews) were used to explore parent and child opinions on factors influencing the decision to try a bone-conduction device and their subsequent use or nonuse. Quantitative methods (questionnaires) investigated the impact of hearing loss on listening effort and fatigue, quality of life, and learning, including executive functions such as working memory, information processing, and attention. Twelve parent–child dyads participated in the study, with children aged 9–14 years.\n \n \n \n A thematic analysis of qualitative data highlighted the importance to parents of timely, consistent, and accessible device information as well as concerns regarding bullying, psychosocial well-being, and educational impacts. Children's concerns included feeling different from their peers, bullying, device appearance, and sound quality, as well as the support they wanted and received. Questionnaire results provided useful confirmatory information on the impacts of unilateral hearing loss on learning for a substantial proportion of the children in this sample.\n \n \n \n The findings provide insights into the wide range of issues that have implications for the provision of audiological services as well as educational and psychological support for children with unilateral microtia–atresia.\n \n \n \n \n https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25583361\n \n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":" 90","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision to proceed with bone-conduction hearing devices is not an easy one despite being the audiological management of choice for the majority of children with unilateral hearing loss secondary to microtia–atresia, and the outcome is not always as hoped for. This study aimed to explore parent and child views on decision making and outcomes. Qualitative methods (focus groups and individual interviews) were used to explore parent and child opinions on factors influencing the decision to try a bone-conduction device and their subsequent use or nonuse. Quantitative methods (questionnaires) investigated the impact of hearing loss on listening effort and fatigue, quality of life, and learning, including executive functions such as working memory, information processing, and attention. Twelve parent–child dyads participated in the study, with children aged 9–14 years. A thematic analysis of qualitative data highlighted the importance to parents of timely, consistent, and accessible device information as well as concerns regarding bullying, psychosocial well-being, and educational impacts. Children's concerns included feeling different from their peers, bullying, device appearance, and sound quality, as well as the support they wanted and received. Questionnaire results provided useful confirmatory information on the impacts of unilateral hearing loss on learning for a substantial proportion of the children in this sample. The findings provide insights into the wide range of issues that have implications for the provision of audiological services as well as educational and psychological support for children with unilateral microtia–atresia. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25583361
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧小耳畸形骨导助听器的家长和儿童体验:决定和结果
尽管骨导助听器是大多数继发于小耳畸形的单侧听力损失患儿的听力治疗选择,但使用骨导助听器的决定并不容易做出,而且结果也不总是尽如人意。本研究旨在探讨家长和儿童对决策和结果的看法。 研究采用定性方法(焦点小组和个别访谈),探讨家长和儿童对影响决定试用骨传导装置的因素以及随后使用或不使用骨传导装置的看法。定量方法(问卷调查)调查了听力损失对听力强度和疲劳、生活质量以及学习(包括工作记忆、信息处理和注意力等执行功能)的影响。参与研究的有 12 个亲子家庭,孩子的年龄在 9-14 岁之间。 对定性数据进行的主题分析强调了及时、一致和可获取的设备信息对父母的重要性,以及对欺凌、社会心理健康和教育影响的担忧。儿童关注的问题包括:感觉自己与同龄人不同、受欺负、设备外观和音质,以及他们希望得到和已经得到的支持。问卷结果提供了有用的确认信息,说明单侧听力损失对样本中相当一部分儿童学习的影响。 调查结果表明,为单侧小耳畸形儿童提供听力服务以及教育和心理支持时,会遇到各种各样的问题。https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25583361。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some Challenging Questions About Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants. A Case Study of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Sign. Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Shared Book Reading Experiences for Young Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems Recommendations for Expanding the Clinical Role of Audiologists in Hospitals in Mainland China: Insights From a Survey-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1