A systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in higher education: Practice, gaps, and future directions in the GCC

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.53761/pswgbw82
Fatma Kayan Fadlelmula, Saba Mansoon Qadhi
{"title":"A systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in higher education: Practice, gaps, and future directions in the GCC","authors":"Fatma Kayan Fadlelmula, Saba Mansoon Qadhi","doi":"10.53761/pswgbw82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acknowledging its potential on diversifying economy and attaining sustainable development, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, comprising of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates, have been investing heavily on digital transformation and keeping pace with technological advancements. In particular, over the last years, with the unified efforts on transitioning to a knowledge society and enhancing educational outcomes, GCC countries have been demonstrating a strong dedication on integrating artificial intelligence in education (AIED). This systematic review investigates characteristics of artificial intelligence (AI) research in the region, identifying advantages and disadvantages of AI utilization in higher education, and exploring main issues accompanied with possible directions for the future. In the Scopus database, 32 studies were analyzed, all open access documents affiliated to a GCC country, having artificial intelligence and higher education, or related terminologies as keywords. Results revealed that AI applications were beneficial for institutions to improve educational outcomes, assist in decision-making, and advance institutional systems. No study reported negativity resulting from AI practices. However, important barriers were identified that hinder the full deployment of AI in higher education, including poor technology skills, inadequate technology infrastructure, resistance in leveraging traditional approaches in education, and challenges related to structural complexity of Arabic language. Future directions are proposed, offering opportunities for practitioners and research potential for scholars.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/pswgbw82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acknowledging its potential on diversifying economy and attaining sustainable development, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, comprising of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates, have been investing heavily on digital transformation and keeping pace with technological advancements. In particular, over the last years, with the unified efforts on transitioning to a knowledge society and enhancing educational outcomes, GCC countries have been demonstrating a strong dedication on integrating artificial intelligence in education (AIED). This systematic review investigates characteristics of artificial intelligence (AI) research in the region, identifying advantages and disadvantages of AI utilization in higher education, and exploring main issues accompanied with possible directions for the future. In the Scopus database, 32 studies were analyzed, all open access documents affiliated to a GCC country, having artificial intelligence and higher education, or related terminologies as keywords. Results revealed that AI applications were beneficial for institutions to improve educational outcomes, assist in decision-making, and advance institutional systems. No study reported negativity resulting from AI practices. However, important barriers were identified that hinder the full deployment of AI in higher education, including poor technology skills, inadequate technology infrastructure, resistance in leveraging traditional approaches in education, and challenges related to structural complexity of Arabic language. Future directions are proposed, offering opportunities for practitioners and research potential for scholars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对高等教育中人工智能研究的系统回顾:海湾合作委员会的实践、差距和未来方向
由巴林、科威特、阿曼、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯王国和阿拉伯联合酋长国组成的海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家认识到其在经济多元化和实现可持续发展方面的潜力,一直在数字化转型方面投入巨资,紧跟技术进步的步伐。特别是在过去几年里,随着向知识社会转型和提高教育成果的统一努力,海湾合作委员会国家在将人工智能融入教育(AIED)方面表现出了强烈的奉献精神。本系统性综述调查了该地区人工智能(AI)研究的特点,明确了高等教育中使用人工智能的优势和劣势,并探讨了主要问题以及未来可能的发展方向。在 Scopus 数据库中分析了 32 项研究,这些研究均为海湾合作委员会国家的开放存取文件,关键词为人工智能和高等教育或相关术语。结果显示,人工智能的应用有利于院校提高教育成果、协助决策和推进院校系统。没有研究报告指出人工智能实践会带来负面影响。不过,也发现了阻碍在高等教育中全面部署人工智能的重要障碍,包括技术技能差、技术基础设施不足、在教育中利用传统方法的阻力,以及与阿拉伯语结构复杂性相关的挑战。提出了未来的发展方向,为从业人员提供了机会,也为学者提供了研究潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Intensive modes of teaching, past, present, and future Editorial: More Practical Gender Research is Needed in Higher Education Leadership and Management What Exactly is Peer Learning? An Exploratory Analysis of Student Class Interaction Reframing Professional Identity: Professional Development Framework for Learning/Educational Designers Perceptions and Experiences of Academic Advisers and Minoritised Students at a UK University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1