Brief psychological intervention to reduce psychological distress among pre-operative cancer patients: A randomized, single-blind, two arm, parallel group-controlled trial in a selected tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka

P. S. Alles, D. Alagiyawanna, M. Seneviwickrama, S. Nanayakkara, M. Kariyawasam, A. Pathirana
{"title":"Brief psychological intervention to reduce psychological distress among pre-operative cancer patients: A randomized, single-blind, two arm, parallel group-controlled trial in a selected tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka","authors":"P. S. Alles, D. Alagiyawanna, M. Seneviwickrama, S. Nanayakkara, M. Kariyawasam, A. Pathirana","doi":"10.4038/sljpsyc.v14i2.8492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Psychological distress among pre-operative cancer patients interferes with treatment outcomes. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a 3-week brief psychological intervention versus routine care on reducing psychological distress among newly diagnosed cancer patients awaiting surgery.Methods: A randomized, single-blind, two arm, parallel groupcontrolled trial was conducted among 88 (intervention=46, control=42) newly diagnosed cancer patients awaiting surgery at Colombo South Teaching Hospital. The primary outcome, psychological distress, was assessed using HADS (cut-off 8) at baseline and 3-weeks later. Secondary outcomes assessed were satisfaction on knowledge and care they received and the physical well-being. Comparisons were made using McNemar’s Chi-Square at p<0.05 based on intention to treat. Effects measures used are odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI and number needed to treat (NNT).Results: The prevalence of anxiety and depression at baseline was 90.91% and 89.77%. Intervention significantly lowered anxiety [intervention 30.43% vs control 69.50%, OR=0.20 (95% CI 0.08, 0.49), p=0.0004]. Depression failed to show a significant reduction [67.6% vs 78.4%, OR=0.53 (95% CI 0.22, 1.28), p=0.1592]. NNT to avert one case of anxiety is 3 (95% CI 1.73, 5.18). Satisfaction on care received is the only secondary outcome that showed a statistically significant association: intervention 36.96% vs. control 14.28% [OR=0.28 (95% CI 0.10-0.81), p=0.0057].Conclusions: The brief psychological intervention was effective in reducing anxiety among newly diagnosed cancer patients. This simple and brief psychological intervention could be recommended for all new cancer patients awaiting surgical interventions. This trial was registered in the Sri Lanka clinical trial registry on 14.10.2021. The registration number is SLCTR/2021/028. The protocol is available at the Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry website. The Universal Trial Number (UTN) is U1111-1269-2819.","PeriodicalId":53403,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljpsyc.v14i2.8492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Psychological distress among pre-operative cancer patients interferes with treatment outcomes. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a 3-week brief psychological intervention versus routine care on reducing psychological distress among newly diagnosed cancer patients awaiting surgery.Methods: A randomized, single-blind, two arm, parallel groupcontrolled trial was conducted among 88 (intervention=46, control=42) newly diagnosed cancer patients awaiting surgery at Colombo South Teaching Hospital. The primary outcome, psychological distress, was assessed using HADS (cut-off 8) at baseline and 3-weeks later. Secondary outcomes assessed were satisfaction on knowledge and care they received and the physical well-being. Comparisons were made using McNemar’s Chi-Square at p<0.05 based on intention to treat. Effects measures used are odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI and number needed to treat (NNT).Results: The prevalence of anxiety and depression at baseline was 90.91% and 89.77%. Intervention significantly lowered anxiety [intervention 30.43% vs control 69.50%, OR=0.20 (95% CI 0.08, 0.49), p=0.0004]. Depression failed to show a significant reduction [67.6% vs 78.4%, OR=0.53 (95% CI 0.22, 1.28), p=0.1592]. NNT to avert one case of anxiety is 3 (95% CI 1.73, 5.18). Satisfaction on care received is the only secondary outcome that showed a statistically significant association: intervention 36.96% vs. control 14.28% [OR=0.28 (95% CI 0.10-0.81), p=0.0057].Conclusions: The brief psychological intervention was effective in reducing anxiety among newly diagnosed cancer patients. This simple and brief psychological intervention could be recommended for all new cancer patients awaiting surgical interventions. This trial was registered in the Sri Lanka clinical trial registry on 14.10.2021. The registration number is SLCTR/2021/028. The protocol is available at the Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry website. The Universal Trial Number (UTN) is U1111-1269-2819.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过简短的心理干预减轻癌症患者术前的心理压力:在斯里兰卡一家选定的三级护理医院进行的随机、单盲、双臂、平行分组对照试验
目的:癌症患者术前的心理困扰会影响治疗效果。本研究旨在确定为期 3 周的简短心理干预与常规护理相比,对减少新诊断癌症患者术前心理困扰的效果:方法:在科伦坡南方教学医院对88名等待手术的新确诊癌症患者(干预组=46人,对照组=42人)进行了随机、单盲、双臂、平行分组对照试验。主要结果是在基线和 3 周后使用 HADS(截断值为 8)评估心理压力。次要评估结果包括对所获知识和护理的满意度以及身体健康状况。根据治疗意向,采用 McNemar's Chi-Square 进行比较,P<0.05。使用的效果测量方法为带有 95% CI 的几率比(OR)和治疗所需人数(NNT):基线焦虑症和抑郁症患病率分别为 90.91% 和 89.77%。干预措施明显降低了焦虑[干预30.43% vs 对照69.50%,OR=0.20 (95% CI 0.08, 0.49),P=0.0004]。抑郁症没有明显减轻[67.6% vs 78.4%,OR=0.53 (95% CI 0.22, 1.28),p=0.1592]。避免一例焦虑症的 NNT 为 3 (95% CI 1.73, 5.18)。对所接受护理的满意度是唯一显示出统计学意义的次要结果:干预组 36.96% 对对照组 14.28% [OR=0.28 (95% CI 0.10-0.81), p=0.0057]:简短的心理干预能有效减轻新诊断癌症患者的焦虑。可以向所有等待手术治疗的癌症新患者推荐这种简单扼要的心理干预。本试验于 2021 年 10 月 14 日在斯里兰卡临床试验登记处登记。注册号为 SLCTR/2021/028。方案可在斯里兰卡临床试验注册网站上查阅。通用试验编号(UTN)为 U1111-1269-2819。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coeditor Dulshika Waas meets Professor Samudra Kathriarachchi, Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry for the first interview in a series of interviews with eminent psychiatrists in Sri Lanka Psychiatry, caught in the web of the internet Towards the same goal from different ends: the use of arts in psychiatric practice Cross-cultural validation: Sinhala versions of pediatric symptom checklists for screening adolescent psychosocial problems A cross-sectional study of the relationship between mental disorders and dating violence victimisation in university undergraduates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1