Cyclic Injection Leads to Larger and More Frequent Induced Earthquakes under Volume-Controlled Conditions

K. Kroll, Elizabeth S. Cochran
{"title":"Cyclic Injection Leads to Larger and More Frequent Induced Earthquakes under Volume-Controlled Conditions","authors":"K. Kroll, Elizabeth S. Cochran","doi":"10.1785/0220230330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As carbon storage technologies advance globally, methods to understand and mitigate induced earthquakes become increasingly important. Although the physical processes that relate increased subsurface pore pressure changes to induced earthquakes have long been known, reliable methods to forecast and control induced seismic sequences remain elusive. Suggested reservoir engineering scenarios for mitigating induced earthquakes typically involve modulation of the injection rate. Some operators have implemented periodic shutdowns (i.e., effective cycling of injection rates) to allow reservoir pressures to equilibrate (e.g., Paradox Valley) or shut-in wells after the occurrence of an event of concern (e.g., Basel, Switzerland). Other proposed scenarios include altering injection rates, actively managing pressures through coproduction of fluids, and preinjection brine extraction. In this work, we use 3D physics-based earthquake simulations to understand the effects of different injection scenarios on induced earthquake rates, maximum event magnitudes, and postinjection seismicity. For comparability, the modeled injection considers the same cumulative volume over the project’s operational life but varies the schedule and rates of fluid injected. Simulation results show that cyclic injection leads to more frequent and larger events than constant injection. Furthermore, with intermittent injection scenario, a significant number of events are shown to occur during pauses in injection, and the seismicity rate remains elevated for longer into the postinjection phase compared to the constant injection scenario.","PeriodicalId":508466,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":" 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As carbon storage technologies advance globally, methods to understand and mitigate induced earthquakes become increasingly important. Although the physical processes that relate increased subsurface pore pressure changes to induced earthquakes have long been known, reliable methods to forecast and control induced seismic sequences remain elusive. Suggested reservoir engineering scenarios for mitigating induced earthquakes typically involve modulation of the injection rate. Some operators have implemented periodic shutdowns (i.e., effective cycling of injection rates) to allow reservoir pressures to equilibrate (e.g., Paradox Valley) or shut-in wells after the occurrence of an event of concern (e.g., Basel, Switzerland). Other proposed scenarios include altering injection rates, actively managing pressures through coproduction of fluids, and preinjection brine extraction. In this work, we use 3D physics-based earthquake simulations to understand the effects of different injection scenarios on induced earthquake rates, maximum event magnitudes, and postinjection seismicity. For comparability, the modeled injection considers the same cumulative volume over the project’s operational life but varies the schedule and rates of fluid injected. Simulation results show that cyclic injection leads to more frequent and larger events than constant injection. Furthermore, with intermittent injection scenario, a significant number of events are shown to occur during pauses in injection, and the seismicity rate remains elevated for longer into the postinjection phase compared to the constant injection scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在体积可控条件下,循环喷射会导致更大、更频繁的诱发地震
随着全球碳封存技术的发展,了解和缓解诱发地震的方法变得越来越重要。尽管人们早已知道地下孔隙压力变化增加与诱发地震之间的物理过程,但预测和控制诱发地震序列的可靠方法仍然难以捉摸。减少诱发地震的建议储层工程方案通常涉及调节注入率。一些作业者已经实施了定期关井(即有效循环注入率),使储层压力达到平衡(例如 Paradox Valley),或在发生令人担忧的事件后关井(例如瑞士巴塞尔)。其他建议方案包括改变注入率、通过共生流体积极管理压力以及注入前提取盐水。在这项工作中,我们使用基于三维物理的地震模拟来了解不同注入方案对诱发地震率、最大事件震级和注入后地震活动性的影响。为便于比较,模拟注入考虑了项目运营期内相同的累积量,但改变了注入流体的时间和速率。模拟结果表明,与持续注入相比,周期性注入会导致更频繁和更大的地震事件。此外,在间歇注入情况下,大量事件发生在注入暂停期间,与持续注入情况相比,地震发生率在注入后阶段的持续时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Geodetic-Based Earthquake Early Warning System for Colombia and Ecuador Constraining the Geometry of the Northwest Pacific Slab Using Deep Clustering of Slab Guided Waves An Empirically Constrained Forecasting Strategy for Induced Earthquake Magnitudes Using Extreme Value Theory A Software Tool for Hybrid Earthquake Forecasting in New Zealand DASPy: A Python Toolbox for DAS Seismology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1