Reflective evaluations of perinatal bereavement care provision in the US and UK: An exploratory qualitative comparative study

Bereavement Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.54210/bj.2024.1119
Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Denise Côté Arsenault, Gail Norris
{"title":"Reflective evaluations of perinatal bereavement care provision in the US and UK: An exploratory qualitative comparative study","authors":"Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Denise Côté Arsenault, Gail Norris","doi":"10.54210/bj.2024.1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increased recognition of the need to improve standards of perinatal bereavementcare, due to its frequency and potential sequelae. As part of a Fulbright Scholar award, United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) researchers collaborated to explore similarities and differences in perinatal bereavement care between two nations. Using an explorative qualitative comparative method, key categories within perinatal bereavement provision were identified and analysed. Themed findings include: (1) Differences in definitions of miscarriage and stillbirth impact care pathways; (2) For the experiencer grief is the same regardless of legal lines drawn; (3) The meaning of loss is personal and ‘fetal personhood’ needs to be acknowledged during care; (4) Appropriate psychological care is required whether miscarriage or stillbirth is experienced. We conclude that perinatal bereavement care should include screening for Postnatal Depression (PND) and Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD), and support should be equally available to all women who experience perinatal bereavement, irrespective of type of loss. Acknowledging that cultures react to loss in different ways, we recommend that strategies are developed to build human resilience. For example, Compassionate-Mind-Training (CMT), which helps people copewith trauma through cultivating compassion and teaching self-care strategies to buildresilience, reduce self-criticism, and decrease threat-based emotions.","PeriodicalId":516981,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54210/bj.2024.1119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increased recognition of the need to improve standards of perinatal bereavementcare, due to its frequency and potential sequelae. As part of a Fulbright Scholar award, United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) researchers collaborated to explore similarities and differences in perinatal bereavement care between two nations. Using an explorative qualitative comparative method, key categories within perinatal bereavement provision were identified and analysed. Themed findings include: (1) Differences in definitions of miscarriage and stillbirth impact care pathways; (2) For the experiencer grief is the same regardless of legal lines drawn; (3) The meaning of loss is personal and ‘fetal personhood’ needs to be acknowledged during care; (4) Appropriate psychological care is required whether miscarriage or stillbirth is experienced. We conclude that perinatal bereavement care should include screening for Postnatal Depression (PND) and Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD), and support should be equally available to all women who experience perinatal bereavement, irrespective of type of loss. Acknowledging that cultures react to loss in different ways, we recommend that strategies are developed to build human resilience. For example, Compassionate-Mind-Training (CMT), which helps people copewith trauma through cultivating compassion and teaching self-care strategies to buildresilience, reduce self-criticism, and decrease threat-based emotions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对美国和英国提供的围产期丧亲护理进行反思性评估:探索性定性比较研究
由于围产期丧亲护理的频率和潜在后遗症,人们越来越认识到需要提高围产期丧亲护理的标准。作为富布赖特学者奖的一部分,美国和英国的研究人员合作探索两国围产期丧亲护理的异同。研究人员采用探索性定性比较方法,确定并分析了围产期丧亲护理的主要类别。主题研究结果包括(1)流产和死产定义的不同影响了护理路径;(2)对于经历者来说,无论法律界限如何划分,悲伤都是一样的;(3)失去的意义是个人的,在护理过程中需要承认 "胎儿的人格";(4)无论经历流产还是死产,都需要适当的心理护理。我们的结论是,围产期丧亲护理应包括产后抑郁症(PND)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的筛查,并且应为所有经历围产期丧亲的妇女提供平等的支持,无论丧亲类型如何。我们认识到不同文化对失去亲人的反应各不相同,因此建议制定相关策略来增强人类的复原力。例如,慈悲心训练(Compassionate-Mind-Training,CMT),它通过培养慈悲心和教授自我护理策略来帮助人们应对创伤,从而建立复原力、减少自我批评和降低威胁情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finding light in the darkness: A journey through four miscarriages Reflective evaluations of perinatal bereavement care provision in the US and UK: An exploratory qualitative comparative study Screening for dysfunctional Covid-19 grief: A replication and extension Bereavement support after a drug-related death: Professional perspectives Good (virtual) grief: The potential of online communities for bereaved older adults during Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1