Adjunctive Use of WATS-3D in Symptomatic GERD Patients Increases Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Dysplasia.

Nicholas J. Shaheen, Robert D Odze, Mendel E. Singer, W. Salyers, Sachin Srinivasan, Vivek Kaul, Arvind J Trindade, Amit Aravapalli, Robert D Herman, Michael S Smith, Matthew J McKinley
{"title":"Adjunctive Use of WATS-3D in Symptomatic GERD Patients Increases Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Dysplasia.","authors":"Nicholas J. Shaheen, Robert D Odze, Mendel E. Singer, W. Salyers, Sachin Srinivasan, Vivek Kaul, Arvind J Trindade, Amit Aravapalli, Robert D Herman, Michael S Smith, Matthew J McKinley","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPatients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) symptoms undergoing screening upper endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) frequently demonstrate columnar-lined epithelium (CLE), with forceps biopsies (FB) failing to yield intestinal metaplasia (IM). Repeat endoscopy is often necessary.\n\n\nAIM\nAssess the yield of IM leading to a diagnosis of BE by the addition of Wide-Area Trans-epithelial Sampling (WATS-3D) to FB in the screening of GERD patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe performed a prospective registry study of GERD patients undergoing screening upper endoscopy. Patients had both WATS-3D and FB. Patients were classified by their Z line appearance: regular, irregular (<1 cm CLE), possible short-segment BE (1-<3cm), and possible long-segment BE (≥3cm). Demographics, IM yield, and dysplasia yield were calculated. Adjunctive yield was defined as cases identified by WATS-3D not detected by FB, divided by cases detected by FB. Clinicians were asked if WATS-3D results impacted patient management.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 23,933 patients, 6,829(28.5%) met endoscopic criteria for BE. Of these, 2,878(42.1%) had IM identified by either FB or WATS-3D. Among patients fulfilling endoscopic criteria for BE, the adjunctive yield of WATS-3D was 76.5%, and absolute yield was 18.1%. 1,317 patients (19.3%) who fulfilled endoscopic BE criteria had IM detected solely by WATS-3D. Of 240 patients with dysplasia, 107(44.6%) were found solely by WATS-3D. Among patients with positive WATS-3D but negative FB, the care plan changed in 90.7%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe addition of WATS-3D to FB in GERD patients being screened for BE resulted in confirmation of BE in an additional 1/5th of patients. Furthermore, dysplasia diagnoses approximately doubled.","PeriodicalId":507623,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) symptoms undergoing screening upper endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) frequently demonstrate columnar-lined epithelium (CLE), with forceps biopsies (FB) failing to yield intestinal metaplasia (IM). Repeat endoscopy is often necessary. AIM Assess the yield of IM leading to a diagnosis of BE by the addition of Wide-Area Trans-epithelial Sampling (WATS-3D) to FB in the screening of GERD patients. METHODS We performed a prospective registry study of GERD patients undergoing screening upper endoscopy. Patients had both WATS-3D and FB. Patients were classified by their Z line appearance: regular, irregular (<1 cm CLE), possible short-segment BE (1-<3cm), and possible long-segment BE (≥3cm). Demographics, IM yield, and dysplasia yield were calculated. Adjunctive yield was defined as cases identified by WATS-3D not detected by FB, divided by cases detected by FB. Clinicians were asked if WATS-3D results impacted patient management. RESULTS Of 23,933 patients, 6,829(28.5%) met endoscopic criteria for BE. Of these, 2,878(42.1%) had IM identified by either FB or WATS-3D. Among patients fulfilling endoscopic criteria for BE, the adjunctive yield of WATS-3D was 76.5%, and absolute yield was 18.1%. 1,317 patients (19.3%) who fulfilled endoscopic BE criteria had IM detected solely by WATS-3D. Of 240 patients with dysplasia, 107(44.6%) were found solely by WATS-3D. Among patients with positive WATS-3D but negative FB, the care plan changed in 90.7%. CONCLUSION The addition of WATS-3D to FB in GERD patients being screened for BE resulted in confirmation of BE in an additional 1/5th of patients. Furthermore, dysplasia diagnoses approximately doubled.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有症状的胃食管反流患者辅助使用 WATS-3D 可提高巴雷特食管和增生异常的检出率。
背景有胃食管反流(GERD)症状的患者在接受巴雷特食管(BE)筛查上消化道镜检查时,经常出现柱状上皮(CLE),而镊子活检(FB)不能发现肠化生(IM)。目的评估在胃食管反流病患者筛查中,在 FB 的基础上增加广域经上皮取样(WATS-3D)技术,从而导致诊断为 BE 的肠化生率。患者同时接受了 WATS-3D 和 FB 检查。患者根据其 Z 线外观进行分类:规则、不规则(<1 厘米 CLE)、可能的短段 BE(1-<3 厘米)和可能的长段 BE(≥3 厘米)。计算人口统计学、IM检出率和发育不良检出率。辅助检出率的定义是:WATS-3D 发现的未被 FB 检测到的病例除以 FB 检测到的病例。结果 在 23933 例患者中,有 6829 例(28.5%)符合 BE 的内镜标准。其中,2878 人(42.1%)通过 FB 或 WATS-3D 鉴定出了 IM。在符合内镜标准的 BE 患者中,WATS-3D 的辅助诊断率为 76.5%,绝对诊断率为 18.1%。1317名符合内镜BE标准的患者(19.3%)仅通过WATS-3D检测到IM。在 240 例发育不良的患者中,107 例(44.6%)仅通过 WATS-3D 发现。在 WATS-3D 阳性但 FB 阴性的患者中,90.7% 的患者的治疗方案发生了改变。此外,发育不良的诊断率大约增加了一倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caution on Interpretation of Noninferiority Trial Results. Duration of Antibiotic in Cholangitis: Better to Have a Tailored Approach. "Reducing Eosinophil Counts in Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children Is Associated with Reduction in Later Stricture Development". Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Multidisciplinary Collaborative Team for Screening of Autoimmune Gastritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1