Language ideologies in metaphors: Exploring L2 Saudi students’ conceptualization of language mixing as a language practice

Najlaa Alharbi
{"title":"Language ideologies in metaphors: Exploring L2 Saudi students’ conceptualization of language mixing as a language practice","authors":"Najlaa Alharbi","doi":"10.55493/5019.v13i2.5051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study aimed to examine the embedded language ideologies within L2 Saudi students’ metaphorical texts to discover their ideological perspectives about language mixing. Using language ideology as a lens of analysis, this study examined 74 metaphorical texts written by undergraduate students to determine their language ideologies. The results revealed that the students held multiple and contradictory language ideologies about language mixing. Students’ language ideologies were found to be an orientation along a language ideological continuum with one end representing the ideology of language mixing as a resource and the other reflecting the ideology of language mixing as a challenge. Some students’ language ideologies may fall somewhere in the middle of this continuum since they expressed conflicting language ideologies, perceiving language mixing as both a valuable resource and a potential challenge. Using language ideologies as a lens to evaluate students' metaphorical texts allowed the different language ideas hidden within the three basic language ideologies to be revealed.  In addition, the study found that the students employed different metaphors to conceptualize language mixing, covering a wide range of areas such as food, drinks, objects, places and activities. The findings suggested that Saudi students’ metaphors and language ideologies are intertwined and mutually influence each other. This study recommends that teachers use conceptual metaphors as a reflective tool to unveil L2 students’ perspectives on academic activities and calls for further research on conceptual metaphors and language ideologies in L2 contexts.","PeriodicalId":36638,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies","volume":" 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i2.5051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study aimed to examine the embedded language ideologies within L2 Saudi students’ metaphorical texts to discover their ideological perspectives about language mixing. Using language ideology as a lens of analysis, this study examined 74 metaphorical texts written by undergraduate students to determine their language ideologies. The results revealed that the students held multiple and contradictory language ideologies about language mixing. Students’ language ideologies were found to be an orientation along a language ideological continuum with one end representing the ideology of language mixing as a resource and the other reflecting the ideology of language mixing as a challenge. Some students’ language ideologies may fall somewhere in the middle of this continuum since they expressed conflicting language ideologies, perceiving language mixing as both a valuable resource and a potential challenge. Using language ideologies as a lens to evaluate students' metaphorical texts allowed the different language ideas hidden within the three basic language ideologies to be revealed.  In addition, the study found that the students employed different metaphors to conceptualize language mixing, covering a wide range of areas such as food, drinks, objects, places and activities. The findings suggested that Saudi students’ metaphors and language ideologies are intertwined and mutually influence each other. This study recommends that teachers use conceptual metaphors as a reflective tool to unveil L2 students’ perspectives on academic activities and calls for further research on conceptual metaphors and language ideologies in L2 contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐喻中的语言意识形态:探索沙特后进生将语言混合作为一种语言实践的观念
本定性研究旨在考察沙特后进生隐喻文本中蕴含的语言意识形态,以发现他们对语言混合的意识形态观点。本研究以语言意识形态为分析视角,考察了 74 篇由本科生撰写的隐喻文本,以确定他们的语言意识形态。研究结果显示,学生们对语言混合持有多种相互矛盾的语言意识形态。研究发现,学生的语言意识形态是沿着语言意识形态连续体的方向发展的,其中一端代表了语言混合是一种资源的意识形态,另一端则反映了语言混合是一种挑战的意识形态。有些学生的语言意识形态可能处于这一连续体的中间位置,因为他们表达了相互矛盾的语言意识形态,认为语言混合既是一种宝贵的资源,也是一种潜在的挑战。以语言意识形态为视角来评价学生的隐喻文本,可以揭示隐藏在三种基本语言意识形态中的不同语言思想。 此外,研究还发现,学生们使用了不同的隐喻来构思语言混合,涉及食物、饮料、物体、地点和活动等多个领域。研究结果表明,沙特学生的隐喻和语言意识形态是相互交织、相互影响的。本研究建议教师使用概念隐喻作为反思工具,揭示第二语言学生对学术活动的看法,并呼吁进一步研究第二语言语境中的概念隐喻和语言意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies
International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Investigating the effectiveness of deductive vs. Inductive instructional approaches on learning modifiers to enhance descriptive writing skills Language ideologies in metaphors: Exploring L2 Saudi students’ conceptualization of language mixing as a language practice The silent scream of nature: Ecocide and environmental crisis in Ice Candy Man An investigation of English speaking problems of Chinese EFL students in Thailand Challenges and strategies in teaching speaking skills to the rural engineering students: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1