Prescription for Love: An Experimental Investigation of Laypeople's Relative Moral Disapproval of Love Drugs.

Q1 Neuroscience AJOB Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1080/21507740.2024.2326923
A. Lantian, Jordane Boudesseul, Florian Cova
{"title":"Prescription for Love: An Experimental Investigation of Laypeople's Relative Moral Disapproval of Love Drugs.","authors":"A. Lantian, Jordane Boudesseul, Florian Cova","doi":"10.1080/21507740.2024.2326923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies regularly bring about profound changes in our daily lives. Romantic relationships are no exception to these transformations. Some philosophers expect the emergence in the near future of love drugs: a theoretically achievable biotechnological intervention that could be designed to strengthen and maintain love in romantic relationships. We investigated laypeople's resistance to the use of such technologies and its sources. Across two studies (Study 1, French and Peruvian university students, N after exclusion = 186; Study 2, Amazon Mechanical Turk sample, N after exclusion = 693, pre-registered), we found that the use of love drugs designed to strengthen and maintain love in romantic relationships are considered as more morally problematic than psychological therapy with the same aim. In Study 2, we show that this last effect is partially due to the fact that the love resulting from the use of love drugs is perceived as less authentic, intense, and durable. We discuss the specific role of authenticity in the relative moral disapproval of love drugs.","PeriodicalId":39022,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Neuroscience","volume":" 2","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2024.2326923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies regularly bring about profound changes in our daily lives. Romantic relationships are no exception to these transformations. Some philosophers expect the emergence in the near future of love drugs: a theoretically achievable biotechnological intervention that could be designed to strengthen and maintain love in romantic relationships. We investigated laypeople's resistance to the use of such technologies and its sources. Across two studies (Study 1, French and Peruvian university students, N after exclusion = 186; Study 2, Amazon Mechanical Turk sample, N after exclusion = 693, pre-registered), we found that the use of love drugs designed to strengthen and maintain love in romantic relationships are considered as more morally problematic than psychological therapy with the same aim. In Study 2, we show that this last effect is partially due to the fact that the love resulting from the use of love drugs is perceived as less authentic, intense, and durable. We discuss the specific role of authenticity in the relative moral disapproval of love drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱的处方:外行人对爱情药物的相对道德否定的实验调查》。
新技术经常给我们的日常生活带来深刻的变化。恋爱关系也不例外。一些哲学家预计,在不久的将来会出现爱情药物:一种理论上可以实现的生物技术干预措施,可用于加强和维持恋爱关系中的爱情。我们调查了普通人对使用此类技术的抵触情绪及其来源。通过两项研究(研究 1,法国和秘鲁大学生,排除后人数 = 186;研究 2,亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 样本,排除后人数 = 693,预先注册),我们发现,与具有相同目的的心理疗法相比,使用旨在加强和维持恋爱关系中的爱情的爱情药物被认为更具有道德问题。在研究 2 中,我们发现最后一种效应的部分原因是,使用爱情药物所产生的爱情被认为不那么真实、强烈和持久。我们将讨论真实性在爱情药物的相对道德不认同中的具体作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Neuroscience
AJOB Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Conditions Between Neurodiversity and the Medical Model. Neurodiversity and the Neuro-Neutral State. "Lovedrugs" May Be a Moral Imperative. "Neuro-Neutrality & Mere-Difference". A Call for Authentic Love: Is That Truly What We Want?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1