The impact of positive childhood experiences on adult psychiatric disorder and symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies

L. Telford, C. Healy, Éilis J O’Reilly, Mary C Clarke
{"title":"The impact of positive childhood experiences on adult psychiatric disorder and symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies","authors":"L. Telford, C. Healy, Éilis J O’Reilly, Mary C Clarke","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13833.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Mental and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability among young people worldwide. Early life environments and experiences have a significant influence on development with long-lasting implications for both physical and mental health. While the harmful effects of childhood adversity are well-documented, positive childhood experiences are less well-established and the degree of association with later mental health outcomes is currently undefined. The proposed systematic review will therefore examine the literature exploring associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and the development of psychiatric disorder or symptoms in adulthood. Methods and analysis Studies examining associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and risk of adult psychiatric disorder or symptoms will be systematically identified by searching Embase, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Customised search strategies will be built for each database by combining key search terms relating to inclusion criteria. No restrictions on publication date will be applied, however searches will be restricted to the English language. Provided data are sufficient, a random-effects model at the 0.05 level of significance will be used to pool quantitative effect estimates. If meta-analysis is not possible, results will be summarised in tables and reported narratively. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies will be used for quality assessment of included studies and the overall strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Heterogeneity between included studies will be explored through visual inspection of forest plots and by assessing the I2 statistic. Reporting of this protocol has been guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Statement. Ethics and dissemination Only published data will be used for this review therefore ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated in a scientific peer-reviewed journal and results presented at conferences.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13833.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Mental and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability among young people worldwide. Early life environments and experiences have a significant influence on development with long-lasting implications for both physical and mental health. While the harmful effects of childhood adversity are well-documented, positive childhood experiences are less well-established and the degree of association with later mental health outcomes is currently undefined. The proposed systematic review will therefore examine the literature exploring associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and the development of psychiatric disorder or symptoms in adulthood. Methods and analysis Studies examining associations between exposure to positive childhood experiences and risk of adult psychiatric disorder or symptoms will be systematically identified by searching Embase, APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Customised search strategies will be built for each database by combining key search terms relating to inclusion criteria. No restrictions on publication date will be applied, however searches will be restricted to the English language. Provided data are sufficient, a random-effects model at the 0.05 level of significance will be used to pool quantitative effect estimates. If meta-analysis is not possible, results will be summarised in tables and reported narratively. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies will be used for quality assessment of included studies and the overall strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Heterogeneity between included studies will be explored through visual inspection of forest plots and by assessing the I2 statistic. Reporting of this protocol has been guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols Statement. Ethics and dissemination Only published data will be used for this review therefore ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated in a scientific peer-reviewed journal and results presented at conferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的童年经历对成年后精神障碍和症状的影响:纵向队列研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析协议书
背景 精神障碍和药物滥用是导致全球青少年残疾的主要原因。早年的生活环境和经历对人的成长有重大影响,并对身心健康产生长远的影响。童年逆境的有害影响已得到充分证实,但积极的童年经历却鲜有人提及,其与日后心理健康结果的关联程度目前也尚未确定。因此,本系统综述将研究探讨童年积极经历与成年后精神障碍或症状发展之间关系的文献。方法与分析 将通过检索 Embase、APA PsycInfo、MEDLINE 和 Scopus,系统地确定研究童年积极经历与成年后精神障碍或症状风险之间关系的研究。我们将结合与纳入标准相关的关键检索词,为每个数据库制定个性化的检索策略。对发表日期不做限制,但搜索仅限于英语。如果数据充足,将使用 0.05 显著性水平的随机效应模型来汇总定量效应估计值。如果无法进行荟萃分析,则将以表格形式总结结果并进行叙述性报告。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的队列研究批判性评估核对表(Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies)将用于对纳入的研究进行质量评估,并将使用 "建议分级评估、发展和评价框架"(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework)对证据体的整体强度进行评估。将通过目测森林图和评估 I2 统计量来探讨纳入研究之间的异质性。本方案的报告遵循《系统综述和元分析方案首选报告项目声明》的标准。伦理与传播 本综述仅使用已发表的数据,因此无需伦理批准。研究结果将在同行评审的科学期刊上发表,并在会议上展示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1