Identifying Pregnant Patients With Suspected Intimate Partner Violence.

Maggie McGing, Matthew J. Ashbrook, V. Cheng, Koji Matsuo, M. Schellenberg, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, K. Matsushima
{"title":"Identifying Pregnant Patients With Suspected Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Maggie McGing, Matthew J. Ashbrook, V. Cheng, Koji Matsuo, M. Schellenberg, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, K. Matsushima","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nIntimate partner violence (IPV) is the leading cause of death in pregnant women. Although it can be difficult to identify patients experiencing IPV, injuries to the head, neck, or face due to an assault are known to correlate with intentional injury. The objective of this study is to assess the contemporary burden of IPV in pregnancy and describe the patient characteristics.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe National Inpatient Sample was queried for all pregnant women between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: suspected IPV (SIPV) and no-SIPV groups. We defined SIPV as any pregnant patient with an identified head, neck, or face injuries categorized as intentional assault. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between SIPV and variables of interest.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 28,540 pregnant patients presented with traumatic injuries with 530 (.02%) identified as SIPV. Suspected IPV patients were younger (25 vs 27 years, P = .012), more likely to be of Black race (46% vs 28%, P = .002), more likely to be in the lowest income quartile (51% vs 38%, P = .031), less likely to have private insurance (12% vs 34%, P < .001), and have higher rates of substance use disorder (35% vs 18%, P < .001). Black race and history of substance use disorder were associated with increased odds of SIPV-related injuries (odds ratio [OR]: 2.01, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.27-3.16, P = .003 and OR: 2.30, IQR 1.54-3.43, P < .001, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur results suggest that there are significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in potential risk for IPV during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 2","pages":"31348241248799"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the leading cause of death in pregnant women. Although it can be difficult to identify patients experiencing IPV, injuries to the head, neck, or face due to an assault are known to correlate with intentional injury. The objective of this study is to assess the contemporary burden of IPV in pregnancy and describe the patient characteristics. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all pregnant women between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: suspected IPV (SIPV) and no-SIPV groups. We defined SIPV as any pregnant patient with an identified head, neck, or face injuries categorized as intentional assault. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between SIPV and variables of interest. RESULTS A total of 28,540 pregnant patients presented with traumatic injuries with 530 (.02%) identified as SIPV. Suspected IPV patients were younger (25 vs 27 years, P = .012), more likely to be of Black race (46% vs 28%, P = .002), more likely to be in the lowest income quartile (51% vs 38%, P = .031), less likely to have private insurance (12% vs 34%, P < .001), and have higher rates of substance use disorder (35% vs 18%, P < .001). Black race and history of substance use disorder were associated with increased odds of SIPV-related injuries (odds ratio [OR]: 2.01, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.27-3.16, P = .003 and OR: 2.30, IQR 1.54-3.43, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that there are significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in potential risk for IPV during pregnancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别有亲密伴侣暴力嫌疑的孕妇。
简介亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是导致孕妇死亡的主要原因。虽然很难识别遭受过 IPV 的患者,但众所周知,因袭击而导致的头部、颈部或面部损伤与故意伤害相关。本研究的目的是评估妊娠期 IPV 的当代负担,并描述患者的特征。方法对 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间的所有孕妇进行全国住院患者样本查询。患者分为两组:疑似 IPV(SIPV)组和无 IPV 组。我们将 SIPV 定义为任何头部、颈部或面部受伤的孕妇,并将其归类为故意伤害。我们对 SIPV 进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估 SIPV 与相关变量之间的关系。结果共有 28,540 名怀孕患者出现外伤,其中 530 人(0.02%)被确认为 SIPV。疑似 IPV 患者更年轻(25 岁 vs 27 岁,P = .012),更有可能是黑人(46% vs 28%,P = .002),更有可能处于收入最低的四分位数(51% vs 38%,P = .031),更不可能拥有私人保险(12% vs 34%,P < .001),药物使用障碍率更高(35% vs 18%,P < .001)。黑人种族和药物使用障碍史与 SIPV 相关伤害的几率增加有关(几率比 [OR]:2.01,四分位数间距 [IQR]:1.27-3.16,P<0.001):结论我们的研究结果表明,在妊娠期间发生 IPV 的潜在风险方面存在着显著的种族和社会经济差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bile Duct Injuries During Urgent Cholecystectomy at a Safety Net Teaching Hospital: Attending Experience and Time of Day May Matter. From Bytes to Best Practices: Tracing ChatGPT-3.5's Evolution and Alignment With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Management. The USCENTCOM Walking Blood Bank Performance Benchmark and Anticipated Benefit of Universal Low Titer Type O Screening. Contemporary Outcomes and Patterns of Injury Associated With Parachuting Accidents. To Drain or Not: Drainage Procedures Remain a Central Tenet of Management of Infected Collections in Acute Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1