How Has South Africa’s Membership of BRICS Intensified Uneven and Combined Development in the Country and Beyond?

Sinan Baran
{"title":"How Has South Africa’s Membership of BRICS Intensified Uneven and Combined Development in the Country and Beyond?","authors":"Sinan Baran","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.1470400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent African scramble has resulted in uneven and combined development (UCD) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) throughout the 21st century due to unequal exchange. South Africa plays a sub-imperial role in this scramble in SSA. It both exploits and is exploited. The mining industry in South Africa has attracted interest from colonial powers, English-speaking businesses, and foreign investors, making it a highly lucrative sector. Furthermore, most black South Africans have been employed in the mining industry since the late 19th century. Over the past 25 years, the African National Congress government has utilised the mining industry to achieve economic transformation through black economic empowerment policies. This study proposes that the mining sector in South Africa is responsible for the ongoing UCD, despite receiving new investments and empowerment policies. South Africa’s inclusion in BRICS has broadened its range of international partners beyond its traditional Western or African counterparts. However, South Africa’s decision to join the BRICS group in 2011 has not yet yielded the expected transformation in the country’s economy and growth. As a result, it is uncertain whether South Africa’s BRICS membership has addressed the country’s persistent problem of UCD. This study argues that South Africa’s BRICS membership has exacerbated UCD in the country. This study proposes that Trotsky’s UCD analytical framework is useful for analysing South Africa’s policy choice to join BRICS, which strengthens its sub-imperial role.","PeriodicalId":506381,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1470400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent African scramble has resulted in uneven and combined development (UCD) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) throughout the 21st century due to unequal exchange. South Africa plays a sub-imperial role in this scramble in SSA. It both exploits and is exploited. The mining industry in South Africa has attracted interest from colonial powers, English-speaking businesses, and foreign investors, making it a highly lucrative sector. Furthermore, most black South Africans have been employed in the mining industry since the late 19th century. Over the past 25 years, the African National Congress government has utilised the mining industry to achieve economic transformation through black economic empowerment policies. This study proposes that the mining sector in South Africa is responsible for the ongoing UCD, despite receiving new investments and empowerment policies. South Africa’s inclusion in BRICS has broadened its range of international partners beyond its traditional Western or African counterparts. However, South Africa’s decision to join the BRICS group in 2011 has not yet yielded the expected transformation in the country’s economy and growth. As a result, it is uncertain whether South Africa’s BRICS membership has addressed the country’s persistent problem of UCD. This study argues that South Africa’s BRICS membership has exacerbated UCD in the country. This study proposes that Trotsky’s UCD analytical framework is useful for analysing South Africa’s policy choice to join BRICS, which strengthens its sub-imperial role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非加入 "金砖五国 "后,如何加剧了本国及其他地区的不均衡和综合发展?
由于交流不平等,最近的非洲争夺战导致整个 21 世纪撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)的发展不平衡和不均衡。南非在撒哈拉以南非洲的这场争夺中扮演着次帝国的角色。它既剥削别人,也被别人剥削。南非的采矿业吸引了殖民国家、英语国家企业和外国投资者的兴趣,使其成为一个利润丰厚的行业。此外,自 19 世纪末以来,大多数南非黑人一直受雇于采矿业。在过去的 25 年中,非洲人国民大会政府通过黑人经济赋权政策,利用采矿业实现了经济转型。本研究认为,尽管南非接受了新的投资和赋权政策,但南非的采矿业仍要对当前的 UCD 负责。南非加入 "金砖五国 "扩大了其国际合作伙伴的范围,超越了传统的西方或非洲合作伙伴。然而,南非于 2011 年决定加入金砖国家集团,但该国的经济和增长尚未出现预期的转变。因此,南非的金砖国家成员身份是否解决了该国长期存在的城市发展不平衡问题尚不确定。本研究认为,南非的金砖国家成员身份加剧了该国的 UCD 问题。本研究提出,托洛茨基的 UCD 分析框架有助于分析南非加入金砖国家的政策选择,因为金砖国家加强了南非的次帝国角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Return of the State and Its Alla Turca Version Undoing a Hybrid Regime: What Lessons can be Extracted from the Case of North Macedonia? The Long Shadow of Structural Marxism in International Relations: Historicising Colonial Strategies in the Americas “Winning the Peace”: The Role of International Peace Settlements in the Creation of World Orders – A “Geopolitical Marxist” Perspective How Has South Africa’s Membership of BRICS Intensified Uneven and Combined Development in the Country and Beyond?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1