{"title":"Mödrar som mördar","authors":"Peter Kostenniemi","doi":"10.14811/clr.v47.877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTheme: Motherhood and Mothering. Ill. ©Stina Wirsén \nMothers That Murder: The Myling, Baby Farmers, and Mothering \nIn contemporary Swedish children’s literature, mylings and baby farmers make frequent appearances. A myling is the ghost of a murdered child, destined to haunt and expose its assassin. Baby farmers were women paid to take care of unwanted children but sometimes killed them, either directly or through neglect. Both motifs indirectly address issues of motherhood and mothering, and the aim of this article is to discuss how they are represented in children’s literature. In research about motherhood, being a mother is often distinguished from the act of mothering. Motherhood is associated with a biological discourse whilst mothering refers to social practices of care that are associated with the mother but may also be carried out by other people. Both mylings and baby farmers address this distinction but in various ways. In folklore about mylings, the biological mother is traditionally singled out as the infant’s killer. This misogynistic discourse is, to some extent, renegotiated in contemporary non-fictional works about Nordic mythology for children. In fictional works, though, the mother is still portrayed as the sole caregiver for the child and the only one to blame for its death, thus disregarding the distinction between motherhood and mothering. Baby farmers are neither mothers nor are they mothering. Children’s novels set in the past describe the baby farmer as part of a societal industry where a discrepancy between motherhood and mothering is displayed: children are born but not cared for. However, the burden of guilt is shared amongst various social actors, including the fathers. In Gothic fiction set in a contemporaneous society, the baby farmer reveals a deficit in mothering altogether and offers neglect – an anti-mothering – in its place.","PeriodicalId":52259,"journal":{"name":"Barnboken","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barnboken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14811/clr.v47.877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
杀人的母亲
主题母性与母爱插图:©Stina Wirsén 《杀人的母亲》:在瑞典当代儿童文学作品中,经常出现 "米灵 "和 "农夫宝宝"。Myling 是被谋杀儿童的鬼魂,注定要纠缠和揭露其暗杀者。养婴人是受雇照顾没人要的孩子的妇女,但有时会直接或因疏忽而杀害他们。这两个主题都间接涉及母性和母爱问题,本文旨在讨论儿童文学作品中如何表现这两个主题。在有关母性的研究中,身为人母与为人母往往是有区别的。母性 "与 "生物学 "相关联,而 "母爱 "则是指与母亲相关联的社会关怀行为,但也可能由其他人来实施。母婴和婴儿农都涉及到这一区别,但方式各不相同。在有关母婴的民间传说中,生身母亲历来是杀害婴儿的凶手。在当代为儿童创作的有关北欧神话的非虚构作品中,这种厌恶女性的论述在某种程度上被重新讨论。不过,在虚构作品中,母亲仍被描绘成孩子的唯一照料者和孩子死亡的唯一责任人,从而无视母性和母爱之间的区别。养婴人既不是母亲,也不是母性。以过去为背景的儿童小说将 "养婴人 "描述为社会产业的一部分,在这一产业中,母性和母爱之间存在差异:孩子出生了,却得不到照顾。然而,包括父亲在内的各种社会角色共同承担了罪责。在以当代社会为背景的哥特小说中,"养婴人 "揭示了母性的缺失,并以忽视--一种反母性--来取而代之。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。