When do voters reveal candidate gender preferences? Evidence from individual‐level ballot data

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Political Research Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1111/1475-6765.12679
Jana Belschner, Raimondas Ibenskas, Florian Weiler
{"title":"When do voters reveal candidate gender preferences? Evidence from individual‐level ballot data","authors":"Jana Belschner, Raimondas Ibenskas, Florian Weiler","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does candidate gender matter for vote choice? Whereas experimental research suggests an average preference for female candidates, observational studies tend to find null effects. In this note, we address the recent debate on how to measure voter preferences on the aggregate and the individual level. We argue that candidate gender preferences exist, but that whether and when they are revealed varies between and within voters. Drawing on an observational design and using data from over 500,000 individual ballots in Lithuanian elections, we employ multilevel regression and exponential random graph models to show how voters' candidate gender preferences are distributed across the electorate and how they vary in size and direction. We find that about half of all voters prefer either male or female candidates. Whereas preference for male candidates tends to be revealed in the first and second preference votes, preference for female candidates is first revealed in lower preference votes. Our results help explain contradictory findings in the literature and illustrate how observational data and methods can be used to assess voter preferences within electorates.","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does candidate gender matter for vote choice? Whereas experimental research suggests an average preference for female candidates, observational studies tend to find null effects. In this note, we address the recent debate on how to measure voter preferences on the aggregate and the individual level. We argue that candidate gender preferences exist, but that whether and when they are revealed varies between and within voters. Drawing on an observational design and using data from over 500,000 individual ballots in Lithuanian elections, we employ multilevel regression and exponential random graph models to show how voters' candidate gender preferences are distributed across the electorate and how they vary in size and direction. We find that about half of all voters prefer either male or female candidates. Whereas preference for male candidates tends to be revealed in the first and second preference votes, preference for female candidates is first revealed in lower preference votes. Our results help explain contradictory findings in the literature and illustrate how observational data and methods can be used to assess voter preferences within electorates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选民何时透露候选人的性别偏好?来自个人层面选票数据的证据
候选人的性别对投票选择有影响吗?实验研究表明,人们平均偏好女性候选人,而观察研究则倾向于发现无效效应。在本文中,我们将讨论近期关于如何衡量选民总体和个体偏好的争论。我们认为,候选人的性别偏好是存在的,但在选民之间和选民内部,候选人的性别偏好是否以及何时显现出来是不同的。通过观察设计和使用立陶宛选举中超过 500,000 张个人选票的数据,我们采用多层次回归和指数随机图模型来展示选民的候选人性别偏好在选民中的分布情况,以及它们在规模和方向上的变化。我们发现,约有一半的选民偏好男性或女性候选人。对男性候选人的偏好往往在第一和第二优先选票中显现,而对女性候选人的偏好则首先在较低优先选票中显现。我们的研究结果有助于解释文献中相互矛盾的结论,并说明了如何利用观察数据和方法来评估选民在选举中的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information When deliberative mini‐publics’ outcomes and political decisions clash: Examining how responsive communication influences legitimacy perceptions Let's talk populist? A survey experiment on effects of (non‐) populist discourse on vote choice Why do people like technocrats? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1