Public perception of media social responsibility in developing countries: a case study of Albania

Pranvera Skana, Blerina Gjerazi
{"title":"Public perception of media social responsibility in developing countries: a case study of Albania","authors":"Pranvera Skana, Blerina Gjerazi","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2024.1338587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into public perceptions of media social responsibility within the contemporary Albanian media landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis of various factors, the study identifies the prevailing principles that the public deems crucial for the media’s social responsibility and how these principles can enhance the media’s contribution to society. A structured questionnaire was used to capture a wide range of public perceptions, with 1,321 questionnaires filled out. These questionnaires were distributed using a face-to-face method across five major urban centers in Albania, ensuring a comprehensive and representative sample of public viewpoints. The distribution method employed a stratified sampling approach to ensure diverse representation across different demographic groups. Additionally, employing a mixed-methods approach, the research includes qualitative interviews with 20 influential stakeholders, including media directors, professors, analysts, and media researchers. Purposive sampling was utilized to select stakeholders representing various sectors of the media landscape. Rigorous measures were taken to mitigate data pollution, including thorough interviewer training and constant monitoring of data quality. An overarching thematic analysis was conducted to identify common themes and patterns across the qualitative interviews, complementing the quantitative findings. To gain further insights, we purposefully selected and conducted a focus group with 28 journalists from various media platforms. The sampling method for the focus group involved purposive sampling to ensure representation from diverse media backgrounds and experiences. Data collected from the focus group underwent thematic analysis to identify common themes and patterns, contributing to an overarching qualitative analysis. This mixed-methods approach facilitated a comprehensive understanding of journalists’ perspectives on social responsibility and the challenges they encounter in fulfilling it. The empirical findings reveal that the media’s social responsibility in Albania does not fully adhere to the expected standards encompassing all relevant principles. Internal dynamics within media organizations and external forces from politics, economics, and society collectively influence this shortfall. The study highlights the importance of considering public perceptions and expectations in shaping media’s social responsibility, emphasizing the need for substantial improvements.","PeriodicalId":507157,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Communication","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1338587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into public perceptions of media social responsibility within the contemporary Albanian media landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis of various factors, the study identifies the prevailing principles that the public deems crucial for the media’s social responsibility and how these principles can enhance the media’s contribution to society. A structured questionnaire was used to capture a wide range of public perceptions, with 1,321 questionnaires filled out. These questionnaires were distributed using a face-to-face method across five major urban centers in Albania, ensuring a comprehensive and representative sample of public viewpoints. The distribution method employed a stratified sampling approach to ensure diverse representation across different demographic groups. Additionally, employing a mixed-methods approach, the research includes qualitative interviews with 20 influential stakeholders, including media directors, professors, analysts, and media researchers. Purposive sampling was utilized to select stakeholders representing various sectors of the media landscape. Rigorous measures were taken to mitigate data pollution, including thorough interviewer training and constant monitoring of data quality. An overarching thematic analysis was conducted to identify common themes and patterns across the qualitative interviews, complementing the quantitative findings. To gain further insights, we purposefully selected and conducted a focus group with 28 journalists from various media platforms. The sampling method for the focus group involved purposive sampling to ensure representation from diverse media backgrounds and experiences. Data collected from the focus group underwent thematic analysis to identify common themes and patterns, contributing to an overarching qualitative analysis. This mixed-methods approach facilitated a comprehensive understanding of journalists’ perspectives on social responsibility and the challenges they encounter in fulfilling it. The empirical findings reveal that the media’s social responsibility in Albania does not fully adhere to the expected standards encompassing all relevant principles. Internal dynamics within media organizations and external forces from politics, economics, and society collectively influence this shortfall. The study highlights the importance of considering public perceptions and expectations in shaping media’s social responsibility, emphasizing the need for substantial improvements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中国家公众对媒体社会责任的看法:阿尔巴尼亚案例研究
本研究深入探讨了当代阿尔巴尼亚媒体环境中公众对媒体社会责任的看法。通过对各种因素的综合分析,本研究确定了公众认为媒体社会责任至关重要的普遍原则,以及这些原则如何能够增强媒体对社会的贡献。研究采用了结构化问卷调查的方式来了解公众的广泛看法,共填写了 1,321 份问卷。这些问卷采用面对面的方式在阿尔巴尼亚的五个主要城市中心发放,确保了公众观点样本的全面性和代表性。分发方法采用了分层抽样法,以确保不同人口群体的代表性各不相同。此外,研究还采用了混合方法,对 20 位有影响力的利益相关者进行了定性访谈,其中包括媒体主管、教授、分析师和媒体研究人员。我们采用了有目的的抽样方法来选择代表媒体各领域的利益相关者。为减少数据污染,我们采取了严格的措施,包括对访谈者进行全面培训和持续监控数据质量。我们进行了总体主题分析,以确定定性访谈中的共同主题和模式,补充定量调查结果。为了进一步深入了解情况,我们有目的地选择了来自不同媒体平台的 28 名记者,并与他们进行了一次焦点小组讨论。焦点小组的抽样方法包括目的性抽样,以确保来自不同媒体背景和经验的代表参与其中。从焦点小组收集的数据经过了主题分析,以确定共同的主题和模式,为总体定性分析做出贡献。这种混合方法有助于全面了解记者对社会责任的看法以及他们在履行社会责任时遇到的挑战。实证研究结果表明,阿尔巴尼亚媒体的社会责任并没有完全符合包含所有相关原则 的预期标准。媒体组织的内部动力以及来自政治、经济和社会的外部力量共同影响了这一不足。本研究强调了在塑造媒体的社会责任时考虑公众的看法和期望的重要性,并强调了大幅改进的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corporate policies to protect against disinformation for young audiences: the case of TikTok Inside a corporate affairs conference: the race for a social license Legitimacy through representation? Media sources and discourses of offshore wind development Systematizing destigmatization in the context of media and communication: a systematic literature review Evolutionary regulatory dynamics in a pluralist and polarized journalism landscape: a case study of the normative framework in Spanish media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1