National Trends and Outcomes in the Operative Management of Thyroid Storm.

Young-Ji Seo, Nikhil L. Chervu, P. Benharash, James X Wu
{"title":"National Trends and Outcomes in the Operative Management of Thyroid Storm.","authors":"Young-Ji Seo, Nikhil L. Chervu, P. Benharash, James X Wu","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThyroid storm is a rare but potentially lethal manifestation of thyrotoxicosis. Guidelines recommend nonoperative management of thyroid storm, but thyroidectomy can be performed if patients fail medical therapy or need immediate resolution of the storm. Outcomes of thyroidectomy for management of thyroid storm remain ill-defined.\n\n\nMETHODS\nUsing the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, a retrospective analysis was conducted of patients admitted with thyroid storm. Outcomes of interest included operative complications and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with receiving thyroidectomy and mortality.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAn estimated 16,175 admissions had a diagnosis of thyroid storm. The incidence of thyroid storm increased from .91 per 100,000 people in 2016 to 1.03 per 100,000 people in 2020, with a concomitant increase in mortality from 2.9% to 5.3% (P < .001). Operative intervention was pursued in 635 (3.9%) cases with a perioperative complication rate of 30%. On multivariable regression, development of acute decompensated heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.03-2.68, P = .037) and acute renal failure (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.17-3.75, P = .013) increased odds of receiving surgery. The same multivariable model did not show a significant association between thyroidectomy and mortality.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThe incidence of thyroid storm and associated mortality increased during the study period. Thyroidectomy is rarely performed during the same admission, with an overall perioperative complication rate of 30% and no effect on mortality. Patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal failure were more likely to receive an operative intervention.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 3","pages":"31348241248704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Thyroid storm is a rare but potentially lethal manifestation of thyrotoxicosis. Guidelines recommend nonoperative management of thyroid storm, but thyroidectomy can be performed if patients fail medical therapy or need immediate resolution of the storm. Outcomes of thyroidectomy for management of thyroid storm remain ill-defined. METHODS Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, a retrospective analysis was conducted of patients admitted with thyroid storm. Outcomes of interest included operative complications and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with receiving thyroidectomy and mortality. RESULTS An estimated 16,175 admissions had a diagnosis of thyroid storm. The incidence of thyroid storm increased from .91 per 100,000 people in 2016 to 1.03 per 100,000 people in 2020, with a concomitant increase in mortality from 2.9% to 5.3% (P < .001). Operative intervention was pursued in 635 (3.9%) cases with a perioperative complication rate of 30%. On multivariable regression, development of acute decompensated heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.66, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.03-2.68, P = .037) and acute renal failure (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.17-3.75, P = .013) increased odds of receiving surgery. The same multivariable model did not show a significant association between thyroidectomy and mortality. DISCUSSION The incidence of thyroid storm and associated mortality increased during the study period. Thyroidectomy is rarely performed during the same admission, with an overall perioperative complication rate of 30% and no effect on mortality. Patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal failure were more likely to receive an operative intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺风暴手术治疗的全国趋势和结果。
背景甲状腺风暴是甲状腺毒症的一种罕见但可能致命的表现。指南建议对甲状腺风暴采取非手术治疗,但如果患者药物治疗无效或需要立即缓解甲状腺风暴,则可实施甲状腺切除术。方法通过2016年至2020年的全国住院患者样本,对甲状腺风暴入院患者进行回顾性分析。研究结果包括手术并发症和死亡率。结果估计有16175名入院患者被诊断为甲状腺风暴。甲状腺风暴的发病率从2016年的每10万人中0.91例增加到2020年的每10万人中1.03例,死亡率也从2.9%增加到5.3%(P < .001)。635例(3.9%)病例进行了手术干预,围手术期并发症发生率为30%。在多变量回归中,急性失代偿性心力衰竭(调整赔率 [AOR] 1.66,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.03-2.68,P = .037)和急性肾功能衰竭(AOR 2.10,95% CI 1.17-3.75,P = .013)的发生增加了接受手术的几率。同样的多变量模型并未显示甲状腺切除术与死亡率之间存在显著关联。甲状腺切除术很少在同一入院时间内进行,围手术期总并发症发生率为30%,对死亡率没有影响。急性失代偿性心力衰竭和肾功能衰竭患者更有可能接受手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bile Duct Injuries During Urgent Cholecystectomy at a Safety Net Teaching Hospital: Attending Experience and Time of Day May Matter. From Bytes to Best Practices: Tracing ChatGPT-3.5's Evolution and Alignment With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Management. The USCENTCOM Walking Blood Bank Performance Benchmark and Anticipated Benefit of Universal Low Titer Type O Screening. Contemporary Outcomes and Patterns of Injury Associated With Parachuting Accidents. To Drain or Not: Drainage Procedures Remain a Central Tenet of Management of Infected Collections in Acute Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1