Unique Genomic Alterations in the Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients With Solid Tumors Brain Metastases

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae052
L. Alder, Gloria Broadwater, Michelle Green, Amanda E. D. Van Swearingen, Eric S Lipp, Jeffrey Melson Clarke, Carey Anders, S. Sammons
{"title":"Unique Genomic Alterations in the Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients With Solid Tumors Brain Metastases","authors":"L. Alder, Gloria Broadwater, Michelle Green, Amanda E. D. Van Swearingen, Eric S Lipp, Jeffrey Melson Clarke, Carey Anders, S. Sammons","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n While serum circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is routine, data from patients with brain metastases (BrMs) is limited. We assessed genomic alterations in ctDNA from patients with solid tumor BrMs in three groups: isolated BrMs with stable extracranial disease (iCNS), concurrent brain and extracranial progression (cCNS), and extracranial progression with no active BrMs (eCNS). We also compared ctDNA alterations between patients with and without BrMs.\n \n \n \n Patients with a Guardant360 ctDNA profile with (n=253) and without BrMs (n=449) from the Duke Molecular Registry between 01/2014 – 12/2020 were identified. Actionable alterations were defined as FDA-recognized or standard of care biomarkers. Disease status was determined via investigator assessment within 30 days of ctDNA collection.\n \n \n \n Among the 253 patients with BrMs: 29 (12%) had iCNS, 160 (63%) cCNS, and 64 (25%) eCNS. Breast (BC) (12.0%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (76.4%) were the most common tumor types. ESR1 (60% vs 25%, p< 0.001) and BRCA2 (17% vs 5%, p=0.022) were more frequent in BC BrMs. In NSCLC BrMs, EGFR alterations were most frequent in the iCNS group (iCNS: 67%, cCNS: 40%, eCNS:37%, p=0.08 and in patients with BrMs (36% vs 17%, p<0.001). Sequencing from both brain tissue and ctDNA were available for 8 patients; 7 (87.5%) had identical alterations.\n \n \n \n This study illustrates the feasibility of detecting alterations from ctDNA among patients with BrMs. A higher frequency of actionable mutations was observed in ctDNA in patients with BrMs. Additional studies comparing ctDNA and alterations in BrMs tissue are needed to determine if ctDNA can be considered a surrogate to support treatment decisions.\n","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While serum circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is routine, data from patients with brain metastases (BrMs) is limited. We assessed genomic alterations in ctDNA from patients with solid tumor BrMs in three groups: isolated BrMs with stable extracranial disease (iCNS), concurrent brain and extracranial progression (cCNS), and extracranial progression with no active BrMs (eCNS). We also compared ctDNA alterations between patients with and without BrMs. Patients with a Guardant360 ctDNA profile with (n=253) and without BrMs (n=449) from the Duke Molecular Registry between 01/2014 – 12/2020 were identified. Actionable alterations were defined as FDA-recognized or standard of care biomarkers. Disease status was determined via investigator assessment within 30 days of ctDNA collection. Among the 253 patients with BrMs: 29 (12%) had iCNS, 160 (63%) cCNS, and 64 (25%) eCNS. Breast (BC) (12.0%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (76.4%) were the most common tumor types. ESR1 (60% vs 25%, p< 0.001) and BRCA2 (17% vs 5%, p=0.022) were more frequent in BC BrMs. In NSCLC BrMs, EGFR alterations were most frequent in the iCNS group (iCNS: 67%, cCNS: 40%, eCNS:37%, p=0.08 and in patients with BrMs (36% vs 17%, p<0.001). Sequencing from both brain tissue and ctDNA were available for 8 patients; 7 (87.5%) had identical alterations. This study illustrates the feasibility of detecting alterations from ctDNA among patients with BrMs. A higher frequency of actionable mutations was observed in ctDNA in patients with BrMs. Additional studies comparing ctDNA and alterations in BrMs tissue are needed to determine if ctDNA can be considered a surrogate to support treatment decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实体瘤脑转移患者循环肿瘤 DNA 中的独特基因组变化
虽然血清循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)已成为常规,但来自脑转移瘤(BrMs)患者的数据却很有限。我们分三组评估了实体瘤脑转移灶患者ctDNA中的基因组变化:颅外疾病稳定的孤立脑转移灶(iCNS)、脑和颅外并发进展(cCNS)以及无活动性脑转移灶的颅外进展(eCNS)。我们还比较了有BrMs和无BrMs患者的ctDNA改变情况。 我们从杜克大学分子注册中心(Duke Molecular Registry)2014年1月1日至2020年12月12日期间鉴定了有BrMs(n=253)和无BrMs(n=449)的Guardant360 ctDNA患者。可操作的改变被定义为 FDA 认可或标准治疗生物标记物。疾病状态由研究者在采集ctDNA后30天内进行评估确定。 在 253 名乳腺癌患者中:29 人(12%)患有 iCNS,160 人(63%)患有 cCNS,64 人(25%)患有 eCNS。乳腺癌(12.0%)和非小细胞肺癌(76.4%)是最常见的肿瘤类型。ESR1(60% vs 25%,p< 0.001)和BRCA2(17% vs 5%,p=0.022)在BC BrMs中更为常见。 在NSCLC BrMs中,EGFR改变在iCNS组(iCNS:67%,cCNS:40%,eCNS:37%,p=0.08)和BrMs患者(36% vs 17%,p<0.001)中最为常见。8例患者的脑组织和ctDNA均可测序,其中7例(87.5%)有相同的改变。 这项研究说明了从 BrMs 患者的 ctDNA 中检测变异的可行性。 在 BrMs 患者的 ctDNA 中观察到了更高频率的可操作突变。 需要进行更多的研究来比较 ctDNA 和 BrMs 组织中的变异,以确定 ctDNA 是否可被视为支持治疗决策的替代物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
International symposium on inheritable central nervous system (CNS) cancer predisposition: A prologue. Correction to: Effect of bevacizumab on refractory meningiomas: 3D volumetric growth rate versus response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria. Effect of antibiotic drug use on outcome and therapy-related toxicity in patients with glioblastoma-A retrospective cohort study. Empowering the next generation in neuro-oncology: Introduction of the EANO Career Boost Initiative. A phase 1 dose escalation of pritumumab in patients with refractory or recurrent gliomas or brain metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1