Pub Date : 2026-02-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf268
Johannes P Pöppe, Melanie Buchta, Matthias Demetz, Christian F Freyschlag, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Claudius Thomé, Harald Stefanits, Saskia Gahleitner, Andreas Gruber, Jürgen Steinbacher, Lukas Machegger, Martin Geroldinger, Georg Zimmermann, Theo F J Kraus, Karl Sotlar, Miikka Korja, Christoph J Griessenauer, Christoph Schwartz
Background: Benefits of tumor resection in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients within the framework of multimodal treatment remains a matter of debate. This retrospective, multicenter analysis aims at the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from microsurgical resection, and the development of a scoring system to improve future decision-making.
Methods: Demographic and outcome data of GBM patients aged 65 years and older, who underwent resection or biopsy at three centers between 2003 and 2022, were analyzed. Frailty was assessed by the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5).
Results: We studied 537 patients (median age 73.4 years); 369 (68.7%) underwent resection and 168 (31.3%) underwent biopsy. Resected patients were younger, were preoperatively more commonly functionally independent, were less frail, and had larger tumor volumes (all P < .001). The median overall survival was 9.1 [confidence interval (CI) 95% 7.9-10.5] months for resected and 2.8 (CI 95% 2.1-4.3) months for biopsied patients (P < .001). The strongest preoperatively determinable predictors for poor survival were older age, significant frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2), and deep-seated tumor location for, both, resected and biopsied patients (P < .001). Based on this, a score (0-5 points) incorporating these parameters was developed. Among patients with assumed favorable prognosis (score ≤ 1) the median survival difference between resection and biopsy was 7.5 months, whereas in case of poor prognosis (score ≥ 4) the difference was 2.1 months. No long-term survivors ≥24 months had a score of ≥3 points.
Conclusions: Selected elderly glioblastoma patients might benefit from microsurgical resection. A score to guide neurosurgical treatment decision-making and patient counseling was developed.
背景:在多模式治疗框架下,老年多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者肿瘤切除的益处仍然是一个有争议的问题。本回顾性多中心分析旨在识别最有可能从显微手术切除中获益的患者,并开发评分系统以改善未来的决策。方法:分析2003年至2022年间在三个中心接受切除术或活检的65岁及以上GBM患者的人口学和结局数据。采用改良5项体质指数(mFI-5)评价体质。结果:我们研究了537例患者(中位年龄73.4岁);369例(68.7%)行切除术,168例(31.3%)行活检。切除的患者更年轻,术前更常见的功能独立,不那么虚弱,肿瘤体积更大(所有P P P)结论:选择的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者可能受益于显微手术切除。制定了神经外科治疗决策和患者咨询的评分标准。
{"title":"On the value of microsurgical resection compared to biopsy in elderly glioblastoma patients: A retrospective multicenter analysis and scoring system proposal.","authors":"Johannes P Pöppe, Melanie Buchta, Matthias Demetz, Christian F Freyschlag, Johannes Kerschbaumer, Claudius Thomé, Harald Stefanits, Saskia Gahleitner, Andreas Gruber, Jürgen Steinbacher, Lukas Machegger, Martin Geroldinger, Georg Zimmermann, Theo F J Kraus, Karl Sotlar, Miikka Korja, Christoph J Griessenauer, Christoph Schwartz","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf268","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benefits of tumor resection in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients within the framework of multimodal treatment remains a matter of debate. This retrospective, multicenter analysis aims at the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from microsurgical resection, and the development of a scoring system to improve future decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and outcome data of GBM patients aged 65 years and older, who underwent resection or biopsy at three centers between 2003 and 2022, were analyzed. Frailty was assessed by the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 537 patients (median age 73.4 years); 369 (68.7%) underwent resection and 168 (31.3%) underwent biopsy. Resected patients were younger, were preoperatively more commonly functionally independent, were less frail, and had larger tumor volumes (all <i>P</i> < .001). The median overall survival was 9.1 [confidence interval (CI) 95% 7.9-10.5] months for resected and 2.8 (CI 95% 2.1-4.3) months for biopsied patients (<i>P</i> < .001). The strongest preoperatively determinable predictors for poor survival were older age, significant frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2), and deep-seated tumor location for, both, resected and biopsied patients (<i>P</i> < .001). Based on this, a score (0-5 points) incorporating these parameters was developed. Among patients with assumed favorable prognosis (score ≤ 1) the median survival difference between resection and biopsy was 7.5 months, whereas in case of poor prognosis (score ≥ 4) the difference was 2.1 months. No long-term survivors ≥24 months had a score of ≥3 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selected elderly glioblastoma patients might benefit from microsurgical resection. A score to guide neurosurgical treatment decision-making and patient counseling was developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf273
Jae Ho Han, Gabriel Wajnberg, Kathleen M Attwood, Lindsay Noiles, Brandon Hannay, Robert Cormier, Simi Chacko, Maya Willms, Andrea L O Hebb, Mary V Macneil, Matthias H Schmidt, Sidney E Croul, Adrienne C Weeks, Jeremy W Roy
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) and cells of the tumour microenvironment (TME) secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the plasma that contain genetic and protein cargo, which function in paracrine signaling. Isolation of these EVs and their cargo from plasma could lead to a simplistic tool that can inform on diagnosis and disease course of GBM.
Methods: In the present study, plasma EVs were captured utilizing a peptide affinity method (Vn96 peptide) from GBM patients and normal controls followed by next generation sequencing to define a small RNA (sRNA) signature unique to GBM.
Results: Over 750 differentially expressed sRNA (miRNA, snoRNA, lncRNA, tRNA, mRNA fragments and non-annotated regions) were identified between GBM and controls. MiEAA 2.0 pathway analysis of the miRNA in the sRNA signature revealed miRNA highly enriched in both EV and GBM pathways demonstrating the validity of results in capturing a signal from the TME. Also revealed were several novel GBM plasma EV sRNA biomarkers including lncRNA RPPH1 (Ribonuclease P Component H1), RNY4 (Ro60-Associated Y4) and RNY5 (Ro60-Associated Y5). Furthermore, in paired longitudinal patient plasma sampling, RPPH1 informed on surgical resection (decreased on resection) and importantly, RPPH1 increased again on clinically defined progression.
Conclusions: The present provides preliminary data that support the continued investigation of plasma EV sRNA sampling (and particularly RPPH1) as part of a multi-pronged approach to GBM diagnosis and disease course surveillance.
{"title":"Plasma extracellular vesicle sampling from glioblastoma demonstrates a small RNA signature indicative of disease and identifies lncRNA <i>RPPH1</i> as a biomarker.","authors":"Jae Ho Han, Gabriel Wajnberg, Kathleen M Attwood, Lindsay Noiles, Brandon Hannay, Robert Cormier, Simi Chacko, Maya Willms, Andrea L O Hebb, Mary V Macneil, Matthias H Schmidt, Sidney E Croul, Adrienne C Weeks, Jeremy W Roy","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf273","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) and cells of the tumour microenvironment (TME) secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the plasma that contain genetic and protein cargo, which function in paracrine signaling. Isolation of these EVs and their cargo from plasma could lead to a simplistic tool that can inform on diagnosis and disease course of GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, plasma EVs were captured utilizing a peptide affinity method (Vn96 peptide) from GBM patients and normal controls followed by next generation sequencing to define a small RNA (sRNA) signature unique to GBM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 750 differentially expressed sRNA (miRNA, snoRNA, lncRNA, tRNA, mRNA fragments and non-annotated regions) were identified between GBM and controls. MiEAA 2.0 pathway analysis of the miRNA in the sRNA signature revealed miRNA highly enriched in both EV and GBM pathways demonstrating the validity of results in capturing a signal from the TME. Also revealed were several novel GBM plasma EV sRNA biomarkers including lncRNA RPPH1 (Ribonuclease P Component H1), RNY4 (Ro60-Associated Y4) and RNY5 (Ro60-Associated Y5). Furthermore, in paired longitudinal patient plasma sampling, RPPH1 informed on surgical resection (decreased on resection) and importantly, RPPH1 increased again on clinically defined progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present provides preliminary data that support the continued investigation of plasma EV sRNA sampling (and particularly RPPH1) as part of a multi-pronged approach to GBM diagnosis and disease course surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf270
Alexander Köpp, Peter Westarp, Marta Nowak, Nils Briel, Maximilian Mastall, Adela Brzobohata, Roger Schenk, Michael Schmid, Emilie Le Rhun, Holger Moch, Michael Weller, Martin Zoche, Tobias Weiss
Background: The gold standard for the diagnosis of brain tumors comprises neurosurgical biopsies or resections for tissue acquisition. Depending on the anatomical location of the tumor, this might not always be feasible. The aim of this study was to assess whether targeted sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be applied in a clinical setting for the detection of cancer-specific mutations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood using a widely available panel, investigating if this approach would facilitate brain tumor diagnosis.
Methods: Patients with newly suspected or confirmed CNS tumors or suspected leptomeningeal metastasis were included. CSF and blood were sampled for each patient. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted sequencing was performed on cfDNA. If available, matched tissue samples were also sequenced using the same gene panel.
Results: We investigated 58 samples from 29 patients. Sequencing was successful in 16 CSF samples (55%) and 29 blood samples (100%). On average, more tumor-specific mutations were found in CSF compared to blood. Patients in whom cfDNA sequencing in CSF was successful had tumors with a significantly shorter distance to the CSF space and were larger in size. In 2 cases, where surgeries were not considered because of high surgical risk due to the anatomical locations of the lesions, the diagnosis was aided by CSF sequencing results. One primary CNS lymphoma and 1 H3 K27M diffuse midline glioma were identified, respectively.
Conclusions: NGS-based targeted sequencing in CSF has the potential to facilitate brain tumor diagnosis in patients presenting with new cerebral lesions.
{"title":"Targeted next-generation sequencing-based sequencing of cell-free DNA in cerebrospinal fluid uncovers cancer-specific mutations in patients with brain cancer using a widely available panel.","authors":"Alexander Köpp, Peter Westarp, Marta Nowak, Nils Briel, Maximilian Mastall, Adela Brzobohata, Roger Schenk, Michael Schmid, Emilie Le Rhun, Holger Moch, Michael Weller, Martin Zoche, Tobias Weiss","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf270","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard for the diagnosis of brain tumors comprises neurosurgical biopsies or resections for tissue acquisition. Depending on the anatomical location of the tumor, this might not always be feasible. The aim of this study was to assess whether targeted sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be applied in a clinical setting for the detection of cancer-specific mutations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood using a widely available panel, investigating if this approach would facilitate brain tumor diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly suspected or confirmed CNS tumors or suspected leptomeningeal metastasis were included. CSF and blood were sampled for each patient. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted sequencing was performed on cfDNA. If available, matched tissue samples were also sequenced using the same gene panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We investigated 58 samples from 29 patients. Sequencing was successful in 16 CSF samples (55%) and 29 blood samples (100%). On average, more tumor-specific mutations were found in CSF compared to blood. Patients in whom cfDNA sequencing in CSF was successful had tumors with a significantly shorter distance to the CSF space and were larger in size. In 2 cases, where surgeries were not considered because of high surgical risk due to the anatomical locations of the lesions, the diagnosis was aided by CSF sequencing results. One primary CNS lymphoma and 1 H3 K27M diffuse midline glioma were identified, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NGS-based targeted sequencing in CSF has the potential to facilitate brain tumor diagnosis in patients presenting with new cerebral lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf270"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883210/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf276
Troy J Kleber, Denái R Milton, Subhiksha Srinivasan, Bikash Panthi, Warren Floyd, Eric A Goethe, Michael A Davies, Hussein A Tawbi, Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Diana Kaya, Jing Li, Todd A Swanson, Subha Perni, Martin C Tom, Chenyang Wang, Sujit Prabhu, Jeffrey S Weinberg, Ian E McCutcheon, Caroline Chung, Sherise D Ferguson, Thomas H Beckham
Background: The efficacy of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) for melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) has been previously reported, leading to uncertainty regarding the optimal role of comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery (cSRS). We therefore conducted a single-institution retrospective study to compare outcomes of upfront versus deferred cSRS for MBM treated with ipi/nivo.
Methods: We identified patients who started ipi/nivo for newly diagnosed MBMs between 2018 and 2023, with or without upfront cSRS. Patients with >15 MBMs, leptomeningeal disease, or whole-brain radiotherapy at baseline were excluded. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs.
Results: Of the 132 patients identified, 52.3% received upfront cSRS and 47.7% did not. Patients who received upfront cSRS had larger maximum MBMs (median 2.3 vs 0.7 cm; P < .001), more symptomatic MBMs (59.4% vs 11.1%; P < .001), higher rates of upfront craniotomy (47.8% vs 7.9%; P < .001), and fewer BRAF V600 mutations (34.8% vs 54.0%; P = .035). Upfront cSRS was not associated with longer overall survival (median 47.0 mo vs not reached; aHR = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.60-1.68]; P = .98) but was associated with reduced incidence of intracranial progression (median 37.6 vs 5.5 mo; aHR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25-0.64]; P < .001).
Conclusions: In this retrospective study, upfront cSRS was more often used in patients with higher-risk MBM and was associated with improved intracranial control, although no significant survival benefit was observed. These findings suggest that starting ipi/nivo alone may be reasonable for lower-risk MBM, but prospective studies are needed to guide optimal integration of cSRS.
背景:ipilimumab和nivolumab (ipi/nivo)治疗黑色素瘤脑转移瘤(MBMs)的疗效此前已有报道,导致综合立体定向放射手术(cSRS)的最佳作用的不确定性。因此,我们进行了一项单机构回顾性研究,比较ipi/nivo治疗MBM的前期和延期cSRS的结果。方法:我们确定了在2018年至2023年期间开始ipi/nivo治疗新诊断MBMs的患者,有或没有前期cSRS。基线时患有bbb15 MBMs、脑脊膜疾病或全脑放疗的患者被排除在外。结果采用多变量回归进行比较,并以校正风险比(aHRs)报告,95% ci。结果:在确定的132例患者中,52.3%接受了前期cSRS, 47.7%未接受。接受前期cSRS的患者有更大的最大MBMs(中位数2.3 vs 0.7 cm, P < 0.001),更多有症状的MBMs (59.4% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001),更高的前期开颅率(47.8% vs 7.9%, P < 0.001), BRAF V600突变更少(34.8% vs 54.0%, P = 0.035)。前期cSRS与更长的总生存期(中位47.0个月vs未达到;aHR = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.60-1.68]; P = 0.98)无关,但与颅内进展发生率降低相关(中位37.6 vs 5.5个月;aHR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25-0.64]; P < .001)。结论:在这项回顾性研究中,虽然没有观察到明显的生存获益,但在高风险MBM患者中更常使用先期cSRS,并且与改善的颅内控制相关。这些发现表明,对于低风险MBM,单独启动ipi/nivo可能是合理的,但需要前瞻性研究来指导cSRS的最佳整合。
{"title":"Outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab with or without upfront comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery.","authors":"Troy J Kleber, Denái R Milton, Subhiksha Srinivasan, Bikash Panthi, Warren Floyd, Eric A Goethe, Michael A Davies, Hussein A Tawbi, Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Diana Kaya, Jing Li, Todd A Swanson, Subha Perni, Martin C Tom, Chenyang Wang, Sujit Prabhu, Jeffrey S Weinberg, Ian E McCutcheon, Caroline Chung, Sherise D Ferguson, Thomas H Beckham","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf276","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) for melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) has been previously reported, leading to uncertainty regarding the optimal role of comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery (cSRS). We therefore conducted a single-institution retrospective study to compare outcomes of upfront versus deferred cSRS for MBM treated with ipi/nivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients who started ipi/nivo for newly diagnosed MBMs between 2018 and 2023, with or without upfront cSRS. Patients with >15 MBMs, leptomeningeal disease, or whole-brain radiotherapy at baseline were excluded. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 132 patients identified, 52.3% received upfront cSRS and 47.7% did not. Patients who received upfront cSRS had larger maximum MBMs (median 2.3 vs 0.7 cm; <i>P</i> < .001), more symptomatic MBMs (59.4% vs 11.1%; <i>P</i> < .001), higher rates of upfront craniotomy (47.8% vs 7.9%; <i>P</i> < .001), and fewer BRAF V600 mutations (34.8% vs 54.0%; <i>P</i> = .035). Upfront cSRS was not associated with longer overall survival (median 47.0 mo vs not reached; aHR = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.60-1.68]; <i>P</i> = .98) but was associated with reduced incidence of intracranial progression (median 37.6 vs 5.5 mo; aHR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25-0.64]; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study, upfront cSRS was more often used in patients with higher-risk MBM and was associated with improved intracranial control, although no significant survival benefit was observed. These findings suggest that starting ipi/nivo alone may be reasonable for lower-risk MBM, but prospective studies are needed to guide optimal integration of cSRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883207/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf240
Abdul Karim Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Taha Khalilullah, Anthony Davidson, Yuanxuan Xia, Tej Azad, Jawad M Khalifeh, A Karim Ahmed, Joshua Weinberg, Chase Foster, Nicholas Theodore, Kristin J Redmond, Daniel Lubelski
Background: Spinal chondrosarcomas are rare, aggressive bone tumors with limited data on optimal radiotherapy strategies, particularly regarding the comparison between proton and photon therapies. This study aims to evaluate long-term survival outcomes and identify effective treatments and risk factors using the National Cancer Database.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with spinal chondrosarcomas were categorized into radiation and no-radiation groups. The radiation group was subdivided into proton and photon therapy cohorts. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed demographic, clinical, and survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified prognostic factors, and survival predictive models were evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics.
Results: Of 1971 patients, 343 (17.4%) received radiation. Surgery was less common in the radiation group (53.9% vs 82.6%, P < .001). Combined surgery and radiation had the best survival outcomes, with proton therapy showing superior survival to photons (P < .001). High-dose radiation (Biologically Effective Dose [BED] >70 Gy) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) improved survival (P < .001). Surgery was associated with increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, P < .001), while radiation showed increased risk (HR = 1.31, P = .003). Machine learning identified tumor size thresholds of 75 mm for photon and 70 mm for proton therapy as predictive of mortality. DeepSurv (AUC = 0.708) identified distant metastasis, tumor size, and age as important prognostic factors for 10-year survival.
Conclusion: Gross total resection (GTR) is the most effective treatment for spinal chondrosarcoma. High-dose radiation therapy (BED > 70 Gy) can be combined with surgery to improve survival in advanced cases. Proton therapy offers superior long-term survival compared to photons, and dose-escalated techniques (Stereotactic Radiosurgery [SRS] and Intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT]) show potential in enhancing outcomes.
背景:脊柱软骨肉瘤是一种罕见的侵袭性骨肿瘤,关于最佳放疗策略的数据有限,特别是关于质子和光子治疗的比较。本研究旨在评估长期生存结果,并利用国家癌症数据库确定有效的治疗方法和危险因素。方法:将诊断为脊柱软骨肉瘤的患者分为放疗组和非放疗组。放疗组又分为质子治疗组和光子治疗组。单变量和Kaplan-Meier分析评估了人口统计学、临床和生存结果。多变量Cox比例风险模型确定预后因素,使用曲线下面积(AUC)指标评估生存预测模型。结果:1971例患者中,343例(17.4%)接受放疗。放疗组手术较少(53.9% vs 82.6%, P < 70gy),立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)改善了生存率(P < 0.003)。机器学习确定光子治疗的肿瘤大小阈值为75毫米,质子治疗的肿瘤大小阈值为70毫米,可预测死亡率。DeepSurv (AUC = 0.708)发现远处转移、肿瘤大小和年龄是影响10年生存率的重要预后因素。结论:全切除是治疗脊柱软骨肉瘤最有效的方法。高剂量放射治疗(BED > 70 Gy)可与手术相结合,以提高晚期病例的生存率。与光子相比,质子治疗提供了更好的长期生存,剂量递增技术(立体定向放射外科[SRS]和调强放射治疗[IMRT])显示出增强预后的潜力。
{"title":"Impact of proton vs. photon radiotherapy on overall survival in the management of spinal chondrosarcoma and mortality risk prediction: A nationwide analysis.","authors":"Abdul Karim Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Taha Khalilullah, Anthony Davidson, Yuanxuan Xia, Tej Azad, Jawad M Khalifeh, A Karim Ahmed, Joshua Weinberg, Chase Foster, Nicholas Theodore, Kristin J Redmond, Daniel Lubelski","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf240","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal chondrosarcomas are rare, aggressive bone tumors with limited data on optimal radiotherapy strategies, particularly regarding the comparison between proton and photon therapies. This study aims to evaluate long-term survival outcomes and identify effective treatments and risk factors using the National Cancer Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with spinal chondrosarcomas were categorized into radiation and no-radiation groups. The radiation group was subdivided into proton and photon therapy cohorts. Univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed demographic, clinical, and survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified prognostic factors, and survival predictive models were evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1971 patients, 343 (17.4%) received radiation. Surgery was less common in the radiation group (53.9% vs 82.6%, <i>P</i> < .001). Combined surgery and radiation had the best survival outcomes, with proton therapy showing superior survival to photons (<i>P</i> < .001). High-dose radiation (Biologically Effective Dose [BED] >70 Gy) and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) improved survival (<i>P</i> < .001). Surgery was associated with increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, <i>P</i> < .001), while radiation showed increased risk (HR = 1.31, <i>P</i> = .003). Machine learning identified tumor size thresholds of 75 mm for photon and 70 mm for proton therapy as predictive of mortality. DeepSurv (AUC = 0.708) identified distant metastasis, tumor size, and age as important prognostic factors for 10-year survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gross total resection (GTR) is the most effective treatment for spinal chondrosarcoma. High-dose radiation therapy (BED > 70 Gy) can be combined with surgery to improve survival in advanced cases. Proton therapy offers superior long-term survival compared to photons, and dose-escalated techniques (Stereotactic Radiosurgery [SRS] and Intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT]) show potential in enhancing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812003/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146000228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf259
Rachael A Vaubel, Wenjuan Zhang, Nishika Karbhari, Ju-Hee Oh, Katie L Waller, Ann Mladek, Sonia Jain, Danielle M Burgenske, Paul A Decker, Matt L Kosel, Zeng Hu, Lauren L Ott, Brett L Carlson, Katrina K Bakken, Tugce Pasa, Nicole R Sarkaria, Surabhi Talele, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Patrizia Sini, William F Elmquist, Jann N Sarkaria
Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitors reactivate wild-type p53 and are a promising therapy for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM). Brigimadlin is a highly potent MDM2 inhibitor being tested in a phase 0/1 clinical trial in combination with radiation in GBM.
Methods: Brigimadlin pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were evaluated in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDXs).
Results: In vitro, brigimadlin impaired viability in TP53 wild-type GBM with an IC50 of 0.8-6.6 nmol/L, but sensitivity did not correlate with MDM2 amplification. In vivo, MDM2 amplification was highly correlated with efficacy. In subcutaneous PDXs, 1 or 2 mg/kg brigimadlin dosed weekly was highly effective in 2 MDM2-amplified PDXs. At 2 mg/kg, brigimadlin delayed tumor regrowth by >5-fold in the MDM2-amplified PDXs compared to 1.5-fold in a non-amplified PDX. In orthotopic PDXs, efficacy was more limited, but 2 mg/kg brigimadlin enhanced the response to fractionated radiation in MDM2-amplified PDXs. Consistent with blood-brain barrier efflux limiting drug distribution, 2 mg/kg brigimadlin extended survival by >5-fold in an MDM2-amplified orthotopic PDX established in Rag1-/-Abcb1a-/- Abcg2-/- mice. In pharmacodynamic studies, p53 target genes were upregulated at both subtherapeutic and therapeutic dose levels, and the extent of activation did not correlate with MDM2 status. Concentrations of brigimadlin in tumor tissue were approximately 10-fold higher in MDM2-amplified tumors, and intracellular drug levels directly correlated with drug-dependent MDM2 upregulation, suggesting target binding affects drug accumulation.
Conclusions: Brigimadlin is highly effective in MDM2-amplified GBM when adequate drug levels are achieved in tumor tissue. MDM2 amplification impacts both treatment efficacy and intratumoral drug accumulation.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-efficacy modeling of the MDM2 inhibitor brigimadlin in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts.","authors":"Rachael A Vaubel, Wenjuan Zhang, Nishika Karbhari, Ju-Hee Oh, Katie L Waller, Ann Mladek, Sonia Jain, Danielle M Burgenske, Paul A Decker, Matt L Kosel, Zeng Hu, Lauren L Ott, Brett L Carlson, Katrina K Bakken, Tugce Pasa, Nicole R Sarkaria, Surabhi Talele, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Patrizia Sini, William F Elmquist, Jann N Sarkaria","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf259","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitors reactivate wild-type p53 and are a promising therapy for glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM). Brigimadlin is a highly potent MDM2 inhibitor being tested in a phase 0/1 clinical trial in combination with radiation in GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brigimadlin pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were evaluated in GBM patient-derived xenografts (PDXs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro, brigimadlin impaired viability in <i>TP53</i> wild-type GBM with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.8-6.6 nmol/L, but sensitivity did not correlate with <i>MDM2</i> amplification. In vivo, <i>MDM2</i> amplification was highly correlated with efficacy. In subcutaneous PDXs, 1 or 2 mg/kg brigimadlin dosed weekly was highly effective in 2 <i>MDM2-</i>amplified PDXs. At 2 mg/kg, brigimadlin delayed tumor regrowth by >5-fold in the <i>MDM2</i>-amplified PDXs compared to 1.5-fold in a non-amplified PDX. In orthotopic PDXs, efficacy was more limited, but 2 mg/kg brigimadlin enhanced the response to fractionated radiation in <i>MDM2</i>-amplified PDXs. Consistent with blood-brain barrier efflux limiting drug distribution, 2 mg/kg brigimadlin extended survival by >5-fold in an <i>MDM2</i>-amplified orthotopic PDX established in <i>Rag1<sup>-/-</sup>Abcb1a<sup>-/-</sup> Abcg2<sup>-/-</sup></i> mice. In pharmacodynamic studies, p53 target genes were upregulated at both subtherapeutic and therapeutic dose levels, and the extent of activation did not correlate with <i>MDM2</i> status. Concentrations of brigimadlin in tumor tissue were approximately 10-fold higher in <i>MDM2-</i>amplified tumors, and intracellular drug levels directly correlated with drug-dependent MDM2 upregulation, suggesting target binding affects drug accumulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brigimadlin is highly effective in <i>MDM2</i>-amplified GBM when adequate drug levels are achieved in tumor tissue. <i>MDM2</i> amplification impacts both treatment efficacy and intratumoral drug accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254
Anan Zhang, Xiang Huang, Yijin Gao, Haiyan Chen, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Bo Yang, Xiaolong Chen, Anthony Pak-Yin Liu, Rong Zhang
Background: Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) occur 3.5 times more frequently in Chinese children than in western populations. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and diagnostic challenges in a Chinese cooperative group, with particular focus on the roles of pathology and surgical intervention.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 62 consecutively diagnosed pediatric patients with NGGCT (September 2018-June 2023) from Shanghai Children's Medical Center and Huashan Hospital. NGGCT was diagnosed by histopathology with/without elevated tumor markers (n = 46) or by elevated markers alone (n = 16). All patients received standardized treatment according to Children's Oncology Group ACNS0122 protocol. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 12 paired tumor-blood samples to characterize molecular alterations.
Results: The study cohort included 49 males and 13 females (median age, 9.8 year). Primary locations were mainly pineal (58%) and suprasellar (29%). Treatment delays (>6 mo) occurred in 21% of patients, particularly those with non-pineal locations and endocrine symptoms. The 3 years event-free survival and overall survival rates were 81.9 ± 5.4% and 91.3 ± 3.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified poor prognostic factors: elevated AFP >200 ng/mL, spinal metastases, and lack of complete/partial response after induction chemotherapy. Surgical resection of small residual tumors (<2 cm) provided no survival benefit. Molecular analysis revealed KRAS and KIT as the most frequent mutations, with chromosome 12p abnormalities in 50% of cases.
Conclusions: Standardized multidisciplinary treatment achieves favorable outcomes comparable to international benchmarks. Aggressive surgery does not improve survival when tumor markers normalize. Diagnostic delays remain common, emphasizing the need for improved awareness and referral systems in China.
{"title":"Pre-treatment journey and outcome for children with intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors-the Shanghai experience.","authors":"Anan Zhang, Xiang Huang, Yijin Gao, Haiyan Chen, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Bo Yang, Xiaolong Chen, Anthony Pak-Yin Liu, Rong Zhang","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) occur 3.5 times more frequently in Chinese children than in western populations. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and diagnostic challenges in a Chinese cooperative group, with particular focus on the roles of pathology and surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 62 consecutively diagnosed pediatric patients with NGGCT (September 2018-June 2023) from Shanghai Children's Medical Center and Huashan Hospital. NGGCT was diagnosed by histopathology with/without elevated tumor markers (<i>n</i> = 46) or by elevated markers alone (<i>n</i> = 16). All patients received standardized treatment according to Children's Oncology Group ACNS0122 protocol. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 12 paired tumor-blood samples to characterize molecular alterations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 49 males and 13 females (median age, 9.8 year). Primary locations were mainly pineal (58%) and suprasellar (29%). Treatment delays (>6 mo) occurred in 21% of patients, particularly those with non-pineal locations and endocrine symptoms. The 3 years event-free survival and overall survival rates were 81.9 ± 5.4% and 91.3 ± 3.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified poor prognostic factors: elevated AFP >200 ng/mL, spinal metastases, and lack of complete/partial response after induction chemotherapy. Surgical resection of small residual tumors (<2 cm) provided no survival benefit. Molecular analysis revealed <i>KRAS</i> and <i>KIT</i> as the most frequent mutations, with chromosome 12p abnormalities in 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized multidisciplinary treatment achieves favorable outcomes comparable to international benchmarks. Aggressive surgery does not improve survival when tumor markers normalize. Diagnostic delays remain common, emphasizing the need for improved awareness and referral systems in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf254"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888384/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146168627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255
Lou Van Eupen, Anthony Waked, Irina Primac, Koen Vermeulen, Isabeau De Bie, Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane, Roel Quintens
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, extensive inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and resistance to standard-of-care, including radiotherapy. Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone of GBM management, but its efficacy is limited by complex tumor biology and mechanisms of radioresistance. This review explores the advances in radiotherapy for GBM, focusing on the interplay between tumor biology and emerging treatment strategies. Hallmarks of GBM biology, including hypoxia, the robust DNA repair mechanisms, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and the extensive plasticity contribute to therapeutic resistance. Innovative approaches in radiotherapy may allow to address these challenges. Charged particle therapies (CPTs), including proton and carbon ion therapy, offer superior precision and enhanced biological effectiveness by delivering lethal doses to tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. FLASH therapy, using ultra-high dose rates, could reduce normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumor control. Furthermore, targeted radionuclide therapy harnesses tumor-specific targets to systemically deliver radiopharmaceuticals carrying therapeutic radionuclides directly to cancer cells, improving specificity and reducing off-target effects. This review highlights the promise of these novel radiotherapy modalities to address GBM's inherent heterogeneity and treatment resistance. By integrating advancements in technology with novel insights into GBM biology, these approaches may significantly improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Innovative radiotherapies for the treatment of glioblastoma.","authors":"Lou Van Eupen, Anthony Waked, Irina Primac, Koen Vermeulen, Isabeau De Bie, Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane, Roel Quintens","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, extensive inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and resistance to standard-of-care, including radiotherapy. Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone of GBM management, but its efficacy is limited by complex tumor biology and mechanisms of radioresistance. This review explores the advances in radiotherapy for GBM, focusing on the interplay between tumor biology and emerging treatment strategies. Hallmarks of GBM biology, including hypoxia, the robust DNA repair mechanisms, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and the extensive plasticity contribute to therapeutic resistance. Innovative approaches in radiotherapy may allow to address these challenges. Charged particle therapies (CPTs), including proton and carbon ion therapy, offer superior precision and enhanced biological effectiveness by delivering lethal doses to tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. FLASH therapy, using ultra-high dose rates, could reduce normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumor control. Furthermore, targeted radionuclide therapy harnesses tumor-specific targets to systemically deliver radiopharmaceuticals carrying therapeutic radionuclides directly to cancer cells, improving specificity and reducing off-target effects. This review highlights the promise of these novel radiotherapy modalities to address GBM's inherent heterogeneity and treatment resistance. By integrating advancements in technology with novel insights into GBM biology, these approaches may significantly improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146184110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218
Christoph Oster, Pia Reineck, Teresa Schmidt, Jana Grieger, Sandeep Sharma, Jonas Feldheim, Kathrin Kizina, Giorgio Cappello, Leon Jekel, Kim M Pabst, Yahya Ahmadipour, Hanah Karadachi, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Lazaros Lazaridis, Nika Guberina, Christoph Pöttgen, Tobias Blau, Kathy Keyvani, Björn Scheffler, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Ulrich Sure, Martin Stuschke, Martin Glas, Sied Kebir
Background: Glioblastoma represents one of the most aggressive and fatal primary brain tumors in adults. Chemotherapeutic agents, while integral to management, frequently induce varying levels of myelotoxicity. The aim is to investigate the clinical impact of myelotoxicity in patients treated with the CeTeG versus the Stupp regimen which has not yet been systematically investigated under real-world conditions.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent radiochemotherapy. Peripheral blood counts were systematically assessed throughout first-line therapy, starting at the initiation of radiation and continuing until either first disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier.
Results: Among 161 identified patients, 133 (83%) were assigned to the myelotoxicity cohort and 28 (17%) to the non-myelotoxicity cohort. Female sex was independently associated with a higher incidence of myelotoxicity (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis leukopenia ≥ grade 2 was significantly associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in both the overall and CeTeG cohorts. Neutropenia ≥ grade 2 similarly correlated with improved survival outcomes in the overall cohort. Prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was associated with a significant survival advantage in both the overall and Stupp cohorts, as was lymphopenia grade 3-4.
Conclusion: Myelotoxicity at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis does not seem to be detrimental to patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis in the Stupp regimen. This raises the intriguing question of whether future chemotherapy dosages could be tailored based on individual blood values, potentially exceeding current standard doses. Prospective studies are needed to explore these possibilities, including the feasibility of high-dose therapies similar to those used in leukemia treatment.
{"title":"Distribution and prognostic significance of myelotoxicity in newly diagnosed glioblastoma in a real-life cohort: Time to treat more aggressively?","authors":"Christoph Oster, Pia Reineck, Teresa Schmidt, Jana Grieger, Sandeep Sharma, Jonas Feldheim, Kathrin Kizina, Giorgio Cappello, Leon Jekel, Kim M Pabst, Yahya Ahmadipour, Hanah Karadachi, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Lazaros Lazaridis, Nika Guberina, Christoph Pöttgen, Tobias Blau, Kathy Keyvani, Björn Scheffler, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Ulrich Sure, Martin Stuschke, Martin Glas, Sied Kebir","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma represents one of the most aggressive and fatal primary brain tumors in adults. Chemotherapeutic agents, while integral to management, frequently induce varying levels of myelotoxicity. The aim is to investigate the clinical impact of myelotoxicity in patients treated with the CeTeG versus the Stupp regimen which has not yet been systematically investigated under real-world conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent radiochemotherapy. Peripheral blood counts were systematically assessed throughout first-line therapy, starting at the initiation of radiation and continuing until either first disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 161 identified patients, 133 (83%) were assigned to the myelotoxicity cohort and 28 (17%) to the non-myelotoxicity cohort. Female sex was independently associated with a higher incidence of myelotoxicity (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis leukopenia ≥ grade 2 was significantly associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in both the overall and CeTeG cohorts. Neutropenia ≥ grade 2 similarly correlated with improved survival outcomes in the overall cohort. Prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was associated with a significant survival advantage in both the overall and Stupp cohorts, as was lymphopenia grade 3-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myelotoxicity at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis does not seem to be detrimental to patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis in the Stupp regimen. This raises the intriguing question of whether future chemotherapy dosages could be tailored based on individual blood values, potentially exceeding current standard doses. Prospective studies are needed to explore these possibilities, including the feasibility of high-dose therapies similar to those used in leukemia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768505/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249
Kevin Thomas Breen, Tuesday Haynes, Matthew Bryce Watowich, Seketoulie Keretsu, Aiguo Li, Yongmei Zhao, Wei Zhang, Meili Zhang, Hua Song, Nicole Briceno, Dionne Davis, Masashi Watanabe, Mark Richard Gilbert, Masaki Terabe
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains poor, and although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the treatment of many tumors, they are ineffective in GBM. However, response to ICIs occurs in high-tumor-mutational-burden (TMB) GBMs. To address the immunological impact of high TMB in GBM, we created a high TMB syngeneic mouse model from the low TMB SB28 GBM cell line.
Methods: We used CRISPR-Cas9 to target murine Msh2, Mlh1, CXCL10, and CCL5. Single-cell-sorted clones were characterized by whole exome, bulk RNA-sequencing, and neoantigen prediction. Clones were injected subcutaneously or intracranially with or without anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 and dexamethasone.
Results: Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2 or Mlh1 increased nonsynonymous mutations. A fraction of mice with intracranial Msh2KO but not Mlh1KO SB28 showed long-term survival with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 treatment plus dexamethasone. Long-term surviving mice from Msh2 KO SB28 rejected rechallenged subcutaneous tumors. Subcutaneous tumors from clones with increased TMB grew more slowly. This was fully abrogated in Rag1 null mice for Msh2KO but only partially for Mlh1KO SB28. Hypermutant Msh2KO clones spontaneously secreted CXCL10, CCL5, and increased pro-inflammatory chemokines after IFN-γ stimulation. Knockout of CXCL10 or CCL5 in the highest TMB Msh2KO clone restored flank tumor growth, indicating loss of immune response despite elevated TMB.
Conclusion: Mismatch repair-deficient SB28 tumors were more immunogenic, but this was not completely correlated with TMB. Rather, rejection depended on increased secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines. Msh2 and Mlh1 loss was not equivalent, suggesting that additional studies are needed to elucidate germline and somatic mismatch repair gene-specific immune alterations.
背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的预后仍然很差,尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已经改变了许多肿瘤的治疗方法,但它们对GBM无效。然而,对ICIs的反应发生在高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB) GBMs中。为了解决高TMB对GBM的免疫影响,我们用低TMB的SB28 GBM细胞系建立了高TMB的同基因小鼠模型。方法:我们使用CRISPR-Cas9靶向小鼠Msh2、Mlh1、CXCL10和CCL5。单细胞分选克隆的特点是全外显子组,散装rna测序和新抗原预测。克隆分别皮下或颅内注射或不注射抗pd -1/抗ctla4和地塞米松。结果:失配修复(MMR)蛋白Msh2或Mlh1的缺失增加了非同义突变。在抗pd -1/抗ctla4联合地塞米松治疗下,一小部分颅内Msh2KO而非Mlh1KO SB28小鼠表现出长期生存。长期存活的Msh2 KO SB28小鼠对皮下肿瘤的再挑战产生排斥反应。TMB增加的克隆的皮下肿瘤生长更慢。在Rag1缺失的Msh2KO小鼠中,这一现象完全消失,但在Mlh1KO SB28小鼠中,这一现象仅部分消失。高突变Msh2KO克隆在IFN-γ刺激后自发分泌CXCL10、CCL5,并增加促炎趋化因子。在TMB最高的Msh2KO克隆中敲除CXCL10或CCL5恢复了侧腹肿瘤的生长,表明尽管TMB升高,但免疫应答丧失。结论:错配修复缺陷的SB28肿瘤具有更强的免疫原性,但这与TMB并不完全相关。相反,排斥反应依赖于促炎趋化因子分泌的增加。Msh2和Mlh1的缺失是不相等的,这表明需要更多的研究来阐明种系和体细胞错配修复基因特异性免疫改变。
{"title":"Increased immunogenicity of hypermutated SB28 syngeneic glioblastoma is partially mediated by alterations in tumor chemokine expression.","authors":"Kevin Thomas Breen, Tuesday Haynes, Matthew Bryce Watowich, Seketoulie Keretsu, Aiguo Li, Yongmei Zhao, Wei Zhang, Meili Zhang, Hua Song, Nicole Briceno, Dionne Davis, Masashi Watanabe, Mark Richard Gilbert, Masaki Terabe","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains poor, and although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the treatment of many tumors, they are ineffective in GBM. However, response to ICIs occurs in high-tumor-mutational-burden (TMB) GBMs. To address the immunological impact of high TMB in GBM, we created a high TMB syngeneic mouse model from the low TMB SB28 GBM cell line.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used CRISPR-Cas9 to target murine <i>Msh2</i>, <i>Mlh1, CXCL10</i>, and <i>CCL5</i>. Single-cell-sorted clones were characterized by whole exome, bulk RNA-sequencing, and neoantigen prediction. Clones were injected subcutaneously or intracranially with or without anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 and dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2 or Mlh1 increased nonsynonymous mutations. A fraction of mice with intracranial <i>Msh2</i>KO but not <i>Mlh1</i>KO SB28 showed long-term survival with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 treatment plus dexamethasone. Long-term surviving mice from <i>Msh2</i> KO SB28 rejected rechallenged subcutaneous tumors. Subcutaneous tumors from clones with increased TMB grew more slowly. This was fully abrogated in <i>Rag1</i> null mice for <i>Msh2</i>KO but only partially for <i>Mlh1</i>KO SB28. Hypermutant <i>Msh2</i>KO clones spontaneously secreted CXCL10, CCL5, and increased pro-inflammatory chemokines after IFN-γ stimulation. Knockout of <i>CXCL10</i> or <i>CCL5</i> in the highest TMB <i>Msh2</i>KO clone restored flank tumor growth, indicating loss of immune response despite elevated TMB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mismatch repair-deficient SB28 tumors were more immunogenic, but this was not completely correlated with TMB. Rather, rejection depended on increased secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines. <i>Msh2</i> and <i>Mlh1</i> loss was not equivalent, suggesting that additional studies are needed to elucidate germline and somatic mismatch repair gene-specific immune alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12859701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}