Quality of life impact in patients with cutaneous toxicities caused by EGFR inhibitors and immunotherapy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1159/000536332
M. Mannino, P. Sollena, A. Di Stefani, Ernesto Rossi, E. D'Argento, Giovanni Schinzari, G. Tortora, Ketty Peris
{"title":"Quality of life impact in patients with cutaneous toxicities caused by EGFR inhibitors and immunotherapy.","authors":"M. Mannino, P. Sollena, A. Di Stefani, Ernesto Rossi, E. D'Argento, Giovanni Schinzari, G. Tortora, Ketty Peris","doi":"10.1159/000536332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nnovel oncologic therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are associated with a new spectrum of adverse reactions, with prominent cutaneous toxicities. The impact of cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on patients' quality of life (QoL) represents an unmet clinical need.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\n1) to assess whether cutaneous toxicities directed therapies are effective in reducing the QoL burden via the submission of two patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) to investigate whether class of oncologic therapy, type of cAE and toxicity severity differently impact on patients' QoL.\n\n\nMETHODS\na prospective observational study was conducted at the Dermatology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, from October 2018 to October 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, under therapy with EGFR-Is or ICIs and experiencing a treatment-related cAE were eligible for the study. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to patients at first clinical visit (T0), at 1-month (T1), and at 3-month (T2) dermatological follow-up.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty cAEs of 51 patients have been recorded. A significant difference in the mean score for both DLQI and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found along the 3-months dermatological follow-up (p <0.0001). A similar QoL improvement was reported for PROMs stratified by class of therapy and toxicity severity (p <0.0001). No difference was reported for patients with pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and psoriasiform eruption as per DLQI. Class of therapy and toxicity severity did not differently impact on patients' QoL at selected timepoints; we reported a higher EORTC QLQ-C30 score at T2 for patients developing psoriasiform eruption compared to other types of cAEs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEarly patients' referral to dermatologists and tailored management could result in better QoL.","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND novel oncologic therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are associated with a new spectrum of adverse reactions, with prominent cutaneous toxicities. The impact of cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on patients' quality of life (QoL) represents an unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVES 1) to assess whether cutaneous toxicities directed therapies are effective in reducing the QoL burden via the submission of two patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) to investigate whether class of oncologic therapy, type of cAE and toxicity severity differently impact on patients' QoL. METHODS a prospective observational study was conducted at the Dermatology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, from October 2018 to October 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, under therapy with EGFR-Is or ICIs and experiencing a treatment-related cAE were eligible for the study. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to patients at first clinical visit (T0), at 1-month (T1), and at 3-month (T2) dermatological follow-up. RESULTS Sixty cAEs of 51 patients have been recorded. A significant difference in the mean score for both DLQI and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found along the 3-months dermatological follow-up (p <0.0001). A similar QoL improvement was reported for PROMs stratified by class of therapy and toxicity severity (p <0.0001). No difference was reported for patients with pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and psoriasiform eruption as per DLQI. Class of therapy and toxicity severity did not differently impact on patients' QoL at selected timepoints; we reported a higher EORTC QLQ-C30 score at T2 for patients developing psoriasiform eruption compared to other types of cAEs. CONCLUSIONS Early patients' referral to dermatologists and tailored management could result in better QoL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表皮生长因子受体抑制剂和免疫疗法对皮肤毒性患者生活质量的影响。
背景新型肿瘤疗法,包括表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-Is)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),与一系列新的不良反应相关,其中突出的是皮肤毒性。目的1)通过提交两种患者报告结果测量指标(PROMs),评估针对皮肤毒性的疗法是否能有效减轻患者的 QoL 负担;2)研究肿瘤疗法类别、cAE 类型和毒性严重程度是否会对患者的 QoL 产生不同影响。方法一项前瞻性观察研究于2018年10月至2019年10月在意大利罗马Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS皮肤科进行。年龄≥18岁、正在接受表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-Is)或ICIs治疗并出现治疗相关cAE的患者均符合研究条件。在首次临床就诊(T0)、1个月(T1)和3个月(T2)皮肤病随访时,对患者进行皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-核心30版3.0(EORTC QLQ-C30)测试。在 3 个月的皮肤病随访中,发现 DLQI 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 的平均得分有明显差异(P <0.0001)。按治疗类别和毒性严重程度分层的 PROMs 也有类似的 QoL 改善(p <0.0001)。根据 DLQI,化脓性肉芽肿样皮损和银屑病样糜烂患者的 QoL 无差异。在选定的时间点,治疗类别和毒性严重程度对患者的 QoL 没有不同的影响;与其他类型的 cAEs 相比,我们发现银屑病样糜烂患者在 T2 阶段的 EORTC QLQ-C30 得分更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
期刊最新文献
Brodalumab is Effective for Psoriasis Patients with Difficult-to-treat Body Regions: Results from an Observational Clinical Study. Treatment satisfaction in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-world survey from the EU5 and US. Management strategies and corticophobia among healthcare professionals involved in the care for atopic dermatitis: a Dutch survey. A territory wide follow-up of primary and secondary extramammary Paget disease of two decades - effects of local disease on survival. Developing a core outcome set for Netherton syndrome: An international multi-stakeholder e-Delphi consensus study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1