Family engagement in a behavioral parenting intervention: A randomized comparison of telehealth versus office-based treatment formats.

IF 5.5 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000887
Amanda L. Sanchez, Natalie Javadi, Jonathan S Comer
{"title":"Family engagement in a behavioral parenting intervention: A randomized comparison of telehealth versus office-based treatment formats.","authors":"Amanda L. Sanchez, Natalie Javadi, Jonathan S Comer","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nDespite effective treatment options, many families-especially those from marginalized backgrounds-lack access to quality care for their children's behavioral difficulties. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a prominent format for the delivery of outpatient services, with potential to increase access to quality care. Although telehealth-delivered parenting interventions are associated with positive clinical outcomes, limited research has examined whether telehealth formats improve treatment engagement relative to office-based care. The present study is the first controlled comparison of engagement across office-based parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and internet-delivered PCIT (iPCIT).\n\n\nMETHOD\nChildren ages 3-5 years, and their caregiver(s) (N = 40) participated in a randomized trial comparing iPCIT to office-based PCIT in the treatment of behavioral problems. Analyses examined the effects of treatment format on engagement (i.e., missed sessions, premature treatment discontinuation, homework completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment satisfaction). Logistic and linear regressions further explored whether treatment format moderated the effects of common predictors of treatment engagement (i.e., family economic means, racial/ethnic background, caregiver stress).\n\n\nRESULTS\niPCIT improved attendance rates relative to office-based PCIT, especially for families from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds. At the same time, among families with relatively higher levels of caregiver stress, office-based PCIT was associated with lower dropout rates and improved treatment alliance and satisfaction, relative to iPCIT.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study provides the first experimental support that telehealth formats can improve treatment attendance in behavioral parenting interventions. Findings highlight nuances in treatment engagement across treatment formats that reveal limits to the extent telehealth transcends engagement concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":"51 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Despite effective treatment options, many families-especially those from marginalized backgrounds-lack access to quality care for their children's behavioral difficulties. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has become a prominent format for the delivery of outpatient services, with potential to increase access to quality care. Although telehealth-delivered parenting interventions are associated with positive clinical outcomes, limited research has examined whether telehealth formats improve treatment engagement relative to office-based care. The present study is the first controlled comparison of engagement across office-based parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) and internet-delivered PCIT (iPCIT). METHOD Children ages 3-5 years, and their caregiver(s) (N = 40) participated in a randomized trial comparing iPCIT to office-based PCIT in the treatment of behavioral problems. Analyses examined the effects of treatment format on engagement (i.e., missed sessions, premature treatment discontinuation, homework completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment satisfaction). Logistic and linear regressions further explored whether treatment format moderated the effects of common predictors of treatment engagement (i.e., family economic means, racial/ethnic background, caregiver stress). RESULTS iPCIT improved attendance rates relative to office-based PCIT, especially for families from minoritized racial/ethnic backgrounds. At the same time, among families with relatively higher levels of caregiver stress, office-based PCIT was associated with lower dropout rates and improved treatment alliance and satisfaction, relative to iPCIT. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first experimental support that telehealth formats can improve treatment attendance in behavioral parenting interventions. Findings highlight nuances in treatment engagement across treatment formats that reveal limits to the extent telehealth transcends engagement concerns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭参与行为养育干预:远程医疗与办公室治疗形式的随机比较。
目的:尽管有有效的治疗方案,但许多家庭(尤其是那些来自边缘化背景的家庭)仍然无法获得高质量的医疗服务来治疗其子女的行为障碍。自 COVID-19 大流行以来,远程保健已成为提供门诊服务的一种重要形式,并有可能增加获得优质护理的机会。虽然远程医疗提供的育儿干预与积极的临床结果有关,但对远程医疗形式是否能提高治疗参与度的研究还很有限。本研究首次对基于诊室的亲子互动疗法(PCIT)和基于互联网的亲子互动疗法(iPCIT)的参与度进行了对照比较。方法 3-5 岁的儿童及其照顾者(N = 40)参加了一项随机试验,该试验比较了 iPCIT 和基于诊室的 PCIT 对行为问题的治疗效果。研究分析了治疗形式对参与度的影响(即错过疗程、过早中断治疗、作业完成情况、治疗联盟和治疗满意度)。逻辑回归和线性回归进一步探讨了治疗形式是否调节了参与治疗的常见预测因素(即家庭经济状况、种族/民族背景、照顾者压力)的影响。结果相对于办公室 PCIT,iPCIT 提高了出勤率,尤其是对于来自少数种族/民族背景的家庭。同时,在照顾者压力相对较高的家庭中,相对于 iPCIT,办公室 PCIT 与较低的辍学率以及较好的治疗联盟和满意度相关。研究结果凸显了不同治疗形式在治疗参与度上的细微差别,揭示了远程医疗在超越参与度问题上的局限性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information PtFe Alloy Nanoparticles Supported on Polymeric Schiff Base-Derived N-Doped Carbon for Oxygen Reduction Reaction Improved Perovskite Solar Cells with an Environmentally Friendly Phthalocyanine Hole Extracting Interlayer Boosting MIL-101(V) as a Vanadium-Based Metal–Organic Framework via MoS2/Graphene Quantum Dot Nanocomposite in Electrochemical Hydrogen Storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1