Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000938
Tracy R G Gladstone, Patrick Pössel, Cheryl Lefaiver, Kristin L Berg, Kristen Kenan, Katherine R Buchholz, Iulia Mihaila, Marian L Fitzgibbon, Brianna Sheppard, Hélène A Gussin, Cathy Joyce, Huma Khan, Jason Canel, Michael Gerges, Michael Berbaum, Linda Schiffer, Kathleen R Diviak, Matthew Lowther, Rebecca T Feinstein, Amanda Knepper, Erica Plunkett, Katherine Lashway, Pia M Montenegro, Amy Kane, Yang Liu, Aubrey Thornton, Eleanor Powell, Emily Pela, Caterina Patriarca, Ashley McHugh, Mathew Chong, Calvin Rusiewski, Shion Kabasele, Allen Shi, Patrick Ryczek, Kenneth Rasinski, Benjamin W Van Voorhees
Objective: Despite the prevalence of depressive disorders among youth, there is no health system model to address the prevention of these disorders.
Method: With the goal of creating effective, tolerable, and scalable interventions for the prevention of adolescent depression, we have fielded three randomized clinical trials, centered in health care delivery organizations that use a whole-of-society approach: (a) Path 2 Purpose (N = 664), comparing the Competent Adulthood Transition with Cognitive Behavioral, Humanistic, and Interpersonal Training (CATCH-IT; B. W. Van Voorhees et al., 2015), guided digital health intervention to a synchronous mental health specialist-led group cognitive behavioral intervention, Coping with Depression Course-Adolescent; (b) PATHway (N = 400), examining the efficacy of the CATCH-IT components; and (c) Behavioral Health Stratified Treatment (N = 780), which examines the feasibility and potential benefit of a coordinated care, risk stratification, and intervention matching approach for adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities using both CATCH-IT (lower risk) and the Coping with Depression Course-Adolescent (higher risk).
Results: The study samples for all three trials include youth from traditionally underrepresented groups (71.8%) with some economic distress (47.6%). Intervention utilization was moderate across trials. Feedback from study teams reveals general barriers to implementation and challenges specific to the pandemic.
Conclusions: We review these trials, report preliminary data on demographics and intervention utilization, and provide feedback from study teams on implementation challenges encountered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"A whole-of-society approach to depression prevention during the global pandemic: Preliminary data from three large-scale trials.","authors":"Tracy R G Gladstone, Patrick Pössel, Cheryl Lefaiver, Kristin L Berg, Kristen Kenan, Katherine R Buchholz, Iulia Mihaila, Marian L Fitzgibbon, Brianna Sheppard, Hélène A Gussin, Cathy Joyce, Huma Khan, Jason Canel, Michael Gerges, Michael Berbaum, Linda Schiffer, Kathleen R Diviak, Matthew Lowther, Rebecca T Feinstein, Amanda Knepper, Erica Plunkett, Katherine Lashway, Pia M Montenegro, Amy Kane, Yang Liu, Aubrey Thornton, Eleanor Powell, Emily Pela, Caterina Patriarca, Ashley McHugh, Mathew Chong, Calvin Rusiewski, Shion Kabasele, Allen Shi, Patrick Ryczek, Kenneth Rasinski, Benjamin W Van Voorhees","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000938","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000938","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the prevalence of depressive disorders among youth, there is no health system model to address the prevention of these disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>With the goal of creating effective, tolerable, and scalable interventions for the prevention of adolescent depression, we have fielded three randomized clinical trials, centered in health care delivery organizations that use a whole-of-society approach: (a) Path 2 Purpose (<i>N</i> = 664), comparing the Competent Adulthood Transition with Cognitive Behavioral, Humanistic, and Interpersonal Training (CATCH-IT; B. W. Van Voorhees et al., 2015), guided digital health intervention to a synchronous mental health specialist-led group cognitive behavioral intervention, Coping with Depression Course-Adolescent; (b) PATHway (<i>N</i> = 400), examining the efficacy of the CATCH-IT components; and (c) Behavioral Health Stratified Treatment (<i>N</i> = 780), which examines the feasibility and potential benefit of a coordinated care, risk stratification, and intervention matching approach for adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities using both CATCH-IT (lower risk) and the Coping with Depression Course-Adolescent (higher risk).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study samples for all three trials include youth from traditionally underrepresented groups (71.8%) with some economic distress (47.6%). Intervention utilization was moderate across trials. Feedback from study teams reveals general barriers to implementation and challenges specific to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We review these trials, report preliminary data on demographics and intervention utilization, and provide feedback from study teams on implementation challenges encountered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"238-251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143441079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000921
Judy Garber, Denise A Chavira, Emma K Adam, Michelle G Craske, Tierney McMahon, Alexander Williams, George Abitante, Isabelle Lanser, Dani S Pashtunyar, Shanting Chen, Richard Zinbarg
Objective: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to test the effects of an online, coached mindfulness intervention on momentary negative affect (mNA) for youth with high levels of trait negative affectivity.
Method: Participants were 111 youth ages 12 to 17 years old (M = 14.17, SD = 1.60). Youth self-identified as 68% female, 29% male, and 4.5% gender diverse; 54.55% identified as White; 31.82 reported being Hispanic/Latinx. Participants were selected for having high levels of trait negative affect and were randomized to receive either the mindfulness program or no intervention. We used ecological momentary assessment to measure stress and emotions and to derive measures of mNA comprised of stressor-independent and stressor-reactive negative affect. The ecological momentary assessment protocol involved participants completing a short survey/diary entry on Qualtrics four times per day for 5 days. Internalizing symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-8, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders.
Results: The mindfulness intervention resulted in a significant reduction in stressor-reactive negative affect (t = 2.001, df = 96, p = .048; Cohen's d = .40), but not stressor-independent mNA or overall mNA. Additionally, reductions in stressor-reactive negative affect significantly correlated with changes in internalizing symptomatology (standardized β = .26, p = .032).
Conclusions: These results indicate that among youth with high levels of trait negative affectivity, a relatively affordable and accessible digital mindfulness program significantly reduced stressor-reactive negative affect. The absence of an effect on stressor-independent or overall average mNA suggests some specificity of the effects of mindfulness to stressor-reactive negative affect in an at-risk sample of adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:本随机对照试验的目的是测试在线、辅导正念干预对具有高水平特质负性情感的青少年瞬时负性情感(mNA)的影响。方法:研究对象为111名12 ~ 17岁青少年(M = 14.17, SD = 1.60)。青年自我认同68%为女性,29%为男性,4.5%为性别多元化;白人占54.55%;31.82人报告为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。参与者被选择为具有高水平的特质负面情绪,并随机接受正念计划或不进行干预。我们使用生态瞬时评估来测量压力和情绪,并得出由压力源独立和压力源反应性负面影响组成的mNA的测量方法。生态瞬时评估方案要求参与者完成一份简短的质量调查/日记,每天四次,持续五天。内化症状通过患者健康问卷-8、广泛性焦虑障碍-7和儿童焦虑相关障碍筛查进行评估。结果:正念干预显著降低应激反应性负性情绪(t = 2.001, df = 96, p = 0.048;Cohen’s d = 0.40),但与压力无关的mNA或整体mNA无关。此外,应激反应性负面影响的减少与内化症状的改变显著相关(标准化β = 0.26, p = 0.032)。结论:在特质负性情绪水平较高的青少年中,一个相对负担得起且容易获得的数字正念程序显著降低了压力-反应性负性情绪。对压力源独立或总体平均mNA没有影响,这表明正念对处于危险中的青少年样本中压力源反应性负面情绪的影响具有一定的特异性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of an online mindfulness program for adolescents at risk for internalizing problems.","authors":"Judy Garber, Denise A Chavira, Emma K Adam, Michelle G Craske, Tierney McMahon, Alexander Williams, George Abitante, Isabelle Lanser, Dani S Pashtunyar, Shanting Chen, Richard Zinbarg","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000921","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to test the effects of an online, coached mindfulness intervention on momentary negative affect (mNA) for youth with high levels of trait negative affectivity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 111 youth ages 12 to 17 years old (<i>M</i> = 14.17, <i>SD</i> = 1.60). Youth self-identified as 68% female, 29% male, and 4.5% gender diverse; 54.55% identified as White; 31.82 reported being Hispanic/Latinx. Participants were selected for having high levels of trait negative affect and were randomized to receive either the mindfulness program or no intervention. We used ecological momentary assessment to measure stress and emotions and to derive measures of mNA comprised of stressor-independent and stressor-reactive negative affect. The ecological momentary assessment protocol involved participants completing a short survey/diary entry on Qualtrics four times per day for 5 days. Internalizing symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-8, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mindfulness intervention resulted in a significant reduction in stressor-reactive negative affect (<i>t</i> = 2.001, <i>df</i> = 96, <i>p</i> = .048; Cohen's <i>d</i> = .40), but not stressor-independent mNA or overall mNA. Additionally, reductions in stressor-reactive negative affect significantly correlated with changes in internalizing symptomatology (standardized β = .26, <i>p</i> = .032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that among youth with high levels of trait negative affectivity, a relatively affordable and accessible digital mindfulness program significantly reduced stressor-reactive negative affect. The absence of an effect on stressor-independent or overall average mNA suggests some specificity of the effects of mindfulness to stressor-reactive negative affect in an at-risk sample of adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"226-237"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000930
Sean Grant, Maria Schweer-Collins, Elizabeth Day, Shaina D Trevino, Katarzyna Steinka-Fry, Emily E Tanner-Smith
Objective: This overview aims to summarize systematic reviews with meta-analyses estimating the effects of school-based depression prevention interventions on depression outcomes.
Method: We conducted electronic searches (Australian Education Index, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, Pubmed, Social Science Premium Collection), hand-searched key journals, and conducted backward and forward citation chasing to identify eligible reviews. Two reviewers independently screened records, assessed full texts for eligibility, and collected data. We narratively summarized review findings and quantified the overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews using Corrected Covered Area.
Results: We identified 29 eligible systematic reviews with 472 included primary studies overall (Mdn = 35, range = 4-137). Only 177 primary studies (37%) were included in more than one review (Corrected Covered Area = 6%). We rated all reviews as low (10%) or critically low (90%) quality on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2, and most reviews (86%) at high risk of bias on Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews. Reviews mostly suggest school-based depression prevention interventions may have modest average positive impacts on depression-related outcomes-both overall and for specific stages of prevention, school levels and student ages, and specific program manuals and intervention types. However, some reviews did not detect effects, and most reviews noted concerns about primary study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias in this body of evidence.
Conclusions: School-based depression prevention interventions may be beneficial on average, though existing reviews have important methodological limitations. A living systematic review conducted according to methodological best practice could provide timely, relevant, and rigorous evidence for educational decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Effectiveness of school-based depression prevention interventions: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on depression outcomes.","authors":"Sean Grant, Maria Schweer-Collins, Elizabeth Day, Shaina D Trevino, Katarzyna Steinka-Fry, Emily E Tanner-Smith","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000930","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This overview aims to summarize systematic reviews with meta-analyses estimating the effects of school-based depression prevention interventions on depression outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted electronic searches (Australian Education Index, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, Pubmed, Social Science Premium Collection), hand-searched key journals, and conducted backward and forward citation chasing to identify eligible reviews. Two reviewers independently screened records, assessed full texts for eligibility, and collected data. We narratively summarized review findings and quantified the overlap of primary studies across systematic reviews using Corrected Covered Area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 29 eligible systematic reviews with 472 included primary studies overall (<i>Mdn</i> = 35, range = 4-137). Only 177 primary studies (37%) were included in more than one review (Corrected Covered Area = 6%). We rated all reviews as low (10%) or critically low (90%) quality on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2, and most reviews (86%) at high risk of bias on Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews. Reviews mostly suggest school-based depression prevention interventions may have modest average positive impacts on depression-related outcomes-both overall and for specific stages of prevention, school levels and student ages, and specific program manuals and intervention types. However, some reviews did not detect effects, and most reviews noted concerns about primary study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias in this body of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>School-based depression prevention interventions may be beneficial on average, though existing reviews have important methodological limitations. A living systematic review conducted according to methodological best practice could provide timely, relevant, and rigorous evidence for educational decision making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 4","pages":"194-212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143692324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000912
Lorenza Dall'Aglio, Jeremy A Labrecque, Isabel Schuurmans, Yingzhe Zhang, Nicole Creasey, Marina Wilson, Chris J Kennedy, Ryan L Muetzel, Jordan W Smoller, Henning Tiemeier, Karmel W Choi
Objective: Specific modifiable factors (e.g., screen time [ST], sleep duration, physical activity, or social connections) are targets for reducing depression risk in adults. However, research in adolescents lacks causal inference implementations, as prevention trials are costly and often prohibitive. Emulating randomized trials with observational data enables inference regarding hypothetical interventions on modifiable factors that reduce depression risk, in general and at-risk populations.
Method: Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (N = 8,699) and the Generation R (N = 3,739) studies were leveraged for modifiable factors (age 10) and internalizing symptoms (age 12-14). We (a) tested prospective associations of each modifiable factor with internalizing symptoms under target trial emulation (TTE) and (b) used G-formula to estimate the potential effects on internalizing symptoms if hypothetical interventions were implemented. Analyses were conducted in the full sample (universal prevention setting) and at-risk youth (selective and indicated prevention setting).
Results: First, under TTE, only ST associated with internalizing symptoms. Second, in the universal prevention setting, adhering to more stringent ST guidelines (0-1 hr) decreased internalizing symptoms by 0.10-0.16 SDs while following more lenient guidelines (3-4 hr) increased them by 0.07-0.09 SDs, compared to existing guidelines (2 hr). Such changes were greater in the indicated (subclinical symptom) prevention settings and robust to residual confounding. Restricting physical activity reduced internalizing risk in the indicated setting, but findings were not robust.
Conclusions: With a causally informed strategy, we demonstrated the potential effects of numerous hypothetical interventions on modifiable factors for depression risk reduction, across multiple preventive settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:特定的可改变因素(如屏幕时间、睡眠时间、身体活动或社会关系)是降低成人抑郁风险的目标。然而,对青少年的研究缺乏因果推理的实施,因为预防试验成本高昂,而且往往令人望而却步。用观察性数据模拟随机试验,可以对降低一般人群和高危人群抑郁风险的可改变因素的假设干预进行推断。方法:利用青少年大脑认知发展(N = 8,699)和R世代(N = 3,739)研究的数据来确定可改变因素(10岁)和内化症状(12-14岁)。我们(a)在目标试验模拟(TTE)下测试了每个可修改因素与内化症状的前瞻性关联,(b)使用g公式估计实施假设干预措施对内化症状的潜在影响。在全样本(普遍预防设置)和高危青年(选择性和指示性预防设置)中进行了分析。结果:首先,在TTE下,只有ST与内化症状相关。其次,在普遍预防环境中,与现有指南(2小时)相比,遵循更严格的ST指南(0-1小时)可使内化症状减少0.10-0.16个标准差,而遵循更宽松的指南(3-4小时)可使内化症状增加0.07-0.09个标准差。这种变化在指征(亚临床症状)预防设置中更大,并且对残留混淆具有稳健性。在指定的环境中,限制身体活动降低了内化风险,但研究结果并不可靠。结论:通过因果信息策略,我们证明了在多种预防设置中,许多假设干预措施对降低抑郁风险的可修改因素的潜在影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Evaluating hypothetical prevention strategies for internalizing symptoms in the general population and at-risk children.","authors":"Lorenza Dall'Aglio, Jeremy A Labrecque, Isabel Schuurmans, Yingzhe Zhang, Nicole Creasey, Marina Wilson, Chris J Kennedy, Ryan L Muetzel, Jordan W Smoller, Henning Tiemeier, Karmel W Choi","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000912","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Specific modifiable factors (e.g., screen time [ST], sleep duration, physical activity, or social connections) are targets for reducing depression risk in adults. However, research in adolescents lacks causal inference implementations, as prevention trials are costly and often prohibitive. Emulating randomized trials with observational data enables inference regarding hypothetical interventions on modifiable factors that reduce depression risk, in general and at-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (<i>N</i> = 8,699) and the Generation R (<i>N</i> = 3,739) studies were leveraged for modifiable factors (age 10) and internalizing symptoms (age 12-14). We (a) tested prospective associations of each modifiable factor with internalizing symptoms under target trial emulation (TTE) and (b) used G-formula to estimate the potential effects on internalizing symptoms if hypothetical interventions were implemented. Analyses were conducted in the full sample (universal prevention setting) and at-risk youth (selective and indicated prevention setting).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, under TTE, only ST associated with internalizing symptoms. Second, in the universal prevention setting, adhering to more stringent ST guidelines (0-1 hr) decreased internalizing symptoms by 0.10-0.16 <i>SD</i>s while following more lenient guidelines (3-4 hr) increased them by 0.07-0.09 <i>SD</i>s, compared to existing guidelines (2 hr). Such changes were greater in the indicated (subclinical symptom) prevention settings and robust to residual confounding. Restricting physical activity reduced internalizing risk in the indicated setting, but findings were not robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a causally informed strategy, we demonstrated the potential effects of numerous hypothetical interventions on modifiable factors for depression risk reduction, across multiple preventive settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"252-266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142932041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000936
Philip J Batterham, Louise Birrell, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Maree Teesson, Pim Cuijpers, Tracy R G Gladstone, Andrew J Mackinnon, Aimy Slade, Helen Christensen
Objective: Rising rates of mental illness in young people over recent decades are a trend that represents a wake-up call across the globe. The causes of this increase are not known. We also know little about effective interventions or implementation strategies to prevent depression in either youth or adults. The need for the prevention of mental ill health represents an outstanding research opportunity for our field.
Method: This conceptual article identifies current challenges in our field, provides potential solutions, and suggests the most promising avenues for future solutions and how we might investigate them.
Results: Key challenges include the following: poor implementation with low fidelity; methodological challenges related to appropriate sampling, time frames, interventions, and active controls; and lack of fit between interventions and their context. Potential solutions include the following: supplementing trials with evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies, establishing prevention models that work at scale including those that address social determinants and show effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries, building capacity in methods, and strengthening geographically dispersed networks of prevention researchers and practitioners.
Conclusions: There are major challenges in conducting prevention research and demonstrating effects. New perspectives and collaborations are needed to overcome existing barriers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:近几十年来,年轻人患精神疾病的比例不断上升,这一趋势值得全球警醒。导致这一增长的原因尚不清楚。我们对预防青少年或成年人抑郁症的有效干预措施或实施策略也知之甚少。预防精神疾病的需求为我们的研究领域提供了一个绝佳的研究机会:这篇概念性文章指出了我们这个领域目前面临的挑战,提供了潜在的解决方案,并提出了未来解决方案中最有希望的途径以及我们可以如何研究这些途径:主要挑战包括:执行不力,保真度低;与适当抽样、时间框架、干预措施和积极控制有关的方法学挑战;干预措施与其背景之间缺乏契合度。潜在的解决方案包括:用大规模流行病学研究的证据对试验进行补充,建立在一定范围内有效的预防模式,包括那些针对社会决定因素并在低收入和中等收入国家显示出有效性的模式,提高方法能力,以及加强地理位置分散的预防研究人员和从业人员网络:在开展预防研究和展示效果方面存在重大挑战。结论:在开展预防研究和展示效果方面存在重大挑战,需要新的视角和合作来克服现有障碍。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Future directions in depression prevention.","authors":"Philip J Batterham, Louise Birrell, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Maree Teesson, Pim Cuijpers, Tracy R G Gladstone, Andrew J Mackinnon, Aimy Slade, Helen Christensen","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000936","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rising rates of mental illness in young people over recent decades are a trend that represents a wake-up call across the globe. The causes of this increase are not known. We also know little about effective interventions or implementation strategies to prevent depression in either youth or adults. The need for the prevention of mental ill health represents an outstanding research opportunity for our field.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This conceptual article identifies current challenges in our field, provides potential solutions, and suggests the most promising avenues for future solutions and how we might investigate them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key challenges include the following: poor implementation with low fidelity; methodological challenges related to appropriate sampling, time frames, interventions, and active controls; and lack of fit between interventions and their context. Potential solutions include the following: supplementing trials with evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies, establishing prevention models that work at scale including those that address social determinants and show effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries, building capacity in methods, and strengthening geographically dispersed networks of prevention researchers and practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are major challenges in conducting prevention research and demonstrating effects. New perspectives and collaborations are needed to overcome existing barriers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"328-339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-10-31DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000913
Jami F Young, Jason D Jones, Karen T G Schwartz, Amy So, Gillian C Dysart, Rebecca M Kanine, Jane E Gillham, Robert Gallop, Molly Davis
Objective: To examine short-term (i.e., postintervention) outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing a school-based telehealth-delivered depression prevention program, Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST), to services as usual (SAU). We expected IPT-AST would be acceptable and feasible and that IPT-AST adolescents would experience greater reductions in depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and impairment compared with SAU.
Method: Adolescents (N = 242; Mage = 14.80 years, SD = 0.70; 65% female; 21% Black; 13% Hispanic/Latinx) with elevated scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) at screening provided data at baseline, 2-month (midpoint of IPT-AST), and 3-month (postintervention) assessments. They reported depression symptoms on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, anxiety symptoms on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (Birmaher et al., 1997), and impairment on the Columbia Impairment Scale (Bird et al., 1993). Baseline depression diagnosis was examined as a moderator.
Results: Hierarchical linear models showed that adolescents reported significant reductions in depression symptoms and impairment across conditions. IPT-AST adolescents reported significantly greater reductions in anxiety symptoms than SAU adolescents, d = .39, 95% CI [.05, .72], p = .003. Depression diagnosis moderated outcomes (ds = .33-.34, ps ≤ .05), such that IPT-AST adolescents without a diagnosis at baseline showed greater improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms than SAU adolescents. Adolescents in SAU with a depression diagnosis at baseline showed greater improvements in impairment compared with IPT-AST. Attendance and satisfaction data demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth-delivered IPT-AST.
Conclusions: Results support telehealth-delivered IPT-AST as a promising intervention for improving short-term outcomes among adolescents with depression symptoms but without a depression diagnosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Telehealth-delivered depression prevention: Short-term outcomes from a school-based randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jami F Young, Jason D Jones, Karen T G Schwartz, Amy So, Gillian C Dysart, Rebecca M Kanine, Jane E Gillham, Robert Gallop, Molly Davis","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000913","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine short-term (i.e., postintervention) outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing a school-based telehealth-delivered depression prevention program, Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST), to services as usual (SAU). We expected IPT-AST would be acceptable and feasible and that IPT-AST adolescents would experience greater reductions in depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and impairment compared with SAU.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adolescents (<i>N</i> = 242; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.80 years, <i>SD</i> = 0.70; 65% female; 21% Black; 13% Hispanic/Latinx) with elevated scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977) at screening provided data at baseline, 2-month (midpoint of IPT-AST), and 3-month (postintervention) assessments. They reported depression symptoms on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, anxiety symptoms on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (Birmaher et al., 1997), and impairment on the Columbia Impairment Scale (Bird et al., 1993). Baseline depression diagnosis was examined as a moderator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical linear models showed that adolescents reported significant reductions in depression symptoms and impairment across conditions. IPT-AST adolescents reported significantly greater reductions in anxiety symptoms than SAU adolescents, <i>d</i> = .39, 95% CI [.05, .72], <i>p</i> = .003. Depression diagnosis moderated outcomes (<i>d</i>s = .33-.34, <i>p</i>s ≤ .05), such that IPT-AST adolescents without a diagnosis at baseline showed greater improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms than SAU adolescents. Adolescents in SAU with a depression diagnosis at baseline showed greater improvements in impairment compared with IPT-AST. Attendance and satisfaction data demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth-delivered IPT-AST.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support telehealth-delivered IPT-AST as a promising intervention for improving short-term outcomes among adolescents with depression symptoms but without a depression diagnosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"213-225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000923
Daniel E Jimenez, Emily J Ross, Elliott R Weinstein, David Martinez Garza, Joseph F Signorile, Doris Perdomo-Johnson, Claudia Martinez
Objective: This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Happy Older Latinos are Active (HOLA) health promotion intervention in a group of older Latinos who were at risk for developing major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder.
Method: Sixty older Latinos age 60+ with subthreshold depression or anxiety were randomized to receive either HOLA (n = 30) or enhanced psychoeducation through fotonovela control (n = 30). The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility, acceptability, and reduction in depression and anxiety symptom severity. Outcome measures were administered at baseline and at the end of the intervention.
Results: Within a year, the enrollment target was met with < 5% of eligible participants refusing randomization. The randomization scheme produced equal numbers of participants randomized to each condition. Four participants (6.7%; HOLA = 1; control = 3) were lost to follow-up, 69% of the HOLA sessions were attended, and participants reported high satisfaction with the intervention. Finally, compared with control, a significant proportion of participants in HOLA experienced a clinically significant reduction in their anxiety symptoms (60% vs. 26.7%).
Conclusions: Findings highlight the feasibility, acceptability, and significant impact the HOLA intervention can have in reducing psychological distress because it is responsive, respectful, and specific to the needs of older Latinos. Furthermore, using a community health worker to deliver a health promotion intervention to prevent common mental disorders in older Latinos is an innovative approach for reducing disease burden in a population living with high disparities in accessing and engaging in mental health services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"Caminando y socializando con Happy Older Latinos are Active (HOLA)\": Results of a randomized clinical trial to promote health and prevent depression and anxiety in older Latinos.","authors":"Daniel E Jimenez, Emily J Ross, Elliott R Weinstein, David Martinez Garza, Joseph F Signorile, Doris Perdomo-Johnson, Claudia Martinez","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000923","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Happy Older Latinos are Active (HOLA) health promotion intervention in a group of older Latinos who were at risk for developing major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty older Latinos age 60+ with subthreshold depression or anxiety were randomized to receive either HOLA (n = 30) or enhanced psychoeducation through <i>fotonovela</i> control (<i>n</i> = 30). The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility, acceptability, and reduction in depression and anxiety symptom severity. Outcome measures were administered at baseline and at the end of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a year, the enrollment target was met with < 5% of eligible participants refusing randomization. The randomization scheme produced equal numbers of participants randomized to each condition. Four participants (6.7%; HOLA = 1; control = 3) were lost to follow-up, 69% of the HOLA sessions were attended, and participants reported high satisfaction with the intervention. Finally, compared with control, a significant proportion of participants in HOLA experienced a clinically significant reduction in their anxiety symptoms (60% vs. 26.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the feasibility, acceptability, and significant impact the HOLA intervention can have in reducing psychological distress because it is responsive, respectful, and specific to the needs of older Latinos. Furthermore, using a community health worker to deliver a health promotion intervention to prevent common mental disorders in older Latinos is an innovative approach for reducing disease burden in a population living with high disparities in accessing and engaging in mental health services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"317-327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932769/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000924
Ida Christine Tholstrup Gjøde, Anne Dorothee Müller, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nicoline Hemager, Sidsel Ingversen, Mala Moszkowicz, Sofie Heidenheim Christensen, Lisbeth Juhl Mikkelsen, Signe Sofie Nielsen, Marianne Melau, Julie Forman, Merete Nordentoft, Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup
Objective: Children of parents with severe mental illness are at increased risk of mental illness throughout their lifespan due to complex gene-environment interactions. Preventive interventions supporting parents and children are warranted. Compared with usual treatment, we tested the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary family-based preventive intervention, VIA Family.
Method: We did a parallel randomized controlled superiority trial in Copenhagen, Denmark. A total of 95 families, of 95 parents with either schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n = 12 [12.6%]), bipolar disorder (n = 25 [26.3%]), or recurrent major depressive disorder (n = 58 [61.1%]), participated. A total of 179 coparents and 113 children (6-12 years) participated. Assessments took place at baseline and after 18 months of intervention. We estimated the effects on family functioning with the McMaster Family Assessment Device and on levels of stimulation and support in the home environment with the Home Observation Measurement of the Environment.
Results: Effects on family functioning did not differ between the two groups: parents with severe mental illness (0.11; 95% CI [-0.10, 0.31]), p = .296, and coparents (-0.07; 95% CI [-0.27, 0.13]), p = .482. Assessor-rated levels of stimulation and support in the home environment improved in VIA Family, but not significantly compared with usual treatment (Mdiff: 1.79; 95% CI [-0.37, 3.95], p = .104). Sensitivity analyses confirmed our main findings.
Conclusions: Effects on family functioning and the home environment did not differ between VIA Family and usual treatment. We cannot rule out a clinically relevant effect of VIA Family on levels of stimulation and support in the home environment. Long-term follow-up will investigate potential preventive effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:由于复杂的基因-环境相互作用,父母患有严重精神疾病的儿童在其一生中患精神疾病的风险增加。支持父母和儿童的预防性干预措施是必要的。与常规治疗相比,我们测试了多学科家庭预防干预的有效性,VIA家庭。方法:在丹麦哥本哈根进行平行随机对照优势试验。共有95个家庭,95名父母患有精神分裂症谱系障碍(n = 12[12.6%])、双相情感障碍(n = 25[26.3%])或复发性重度抑郁症(n = 58[61.1%])。共有179名家长和113名儿童(6-12岁)参与。评估分别在基线和干预18个月后进行。我们用麦克马斯特家庭评估装置评估了对家庭功能的影响,用家庭环境观察测量法评估了家庭环境中的刺激和支持水平。结果:两组对家庭功能的影响无显著差异:父母有严重精神疾病(0.11;95% CI [-0.10, 0.31]), p = .296,父母(-0.07;95% CI [-0.27, 0.13]), p = .482。在VIA家庭中,评估者评定的家庭环境中的刺激和支持水平有所改善,但与常规治疗相比并不显著(Mdiff: 1.79;95% CI [-0.37, 3.95], p = 0.104)。敏感性分析证实了我们的主要发现。结论:VIA家庭治疗与常规治疗对家庭功能和家庭环境的影响无显著差异。我们不能排除VIA家庭对家庭环境中刺激和支持水平的临床相关影响。长期随访将调查潜在的预防效果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Effects on family functioning and the home environment of a family-based preventive intervention for children of parents with severe mental illness: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ida Christine Tholstrup Gjøde, Anne Dorothee Müller, Carsten Hjorthøj, Nicoline Hemager, Sidsel Ingversen, Mala Moszkowicz, Sofie Heidenheim Christensen, Lisbeth Juhl Mikkelsen, Signe Sofie Nielsen, Marianne Melau, Julie Forman, Merete Nordentoft, Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000924","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children of parents with severe mental illness are at increased risk of mental illness throughout their lifespan due to complex gene-environment interactions. Preventive interventions supporting parents and children are warranted. Compared with usual treatment, we tested the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary family-based preventive intervention, VIA Family.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We did a parallel randomized controlled superiority trial in Copenhagen, Denmark. A total of 95 families, of 95 parents with either schizophrenia spectrum disorder (<i>n</i> = 12 [12.6%]), bipolar disorder (<i>n</i> = 25 [26.3%]), or recurrent major depressive disorder (<i>n</i> = 58 [61.1%]), participated. A total of 179 coparents and 113 children (6-12 years) participated. Assessments took place at baseline and after 18 months of intervention. We estimated the effects on family functioning with the McMaster Family Assessment Device and on levels of stimulation and support in the home environment with the Home Observation Measurement of the Environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effects on family functioning did not differ between the two groups: parents with severe mental illness (0.11; 95% CI [-0.10, 0.31]), <i>p</i> = .296, and coparents (-0.07; 95% CI [-0.27, 0.13]), <i>p</i> = .482. Assessor-rated levels of stimulation and support in the home environment improved in VIA Family, but not significantly compared with usual treatment (<i>M</i><sub>diff</sub>: 1.79; 95% CI [-0.37, 3.95], <i>p</i> = .104). Sensitivity analyses confirmed our main findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effects on family functioning and the home environment did not differ between VIA Family and usual treatment. We cannot rule out a clinically relevant effect of VIA Family on levels of stimulation and support in the home environment. Long-term follow-up will investigate potential preventive effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"267-280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kate B Carey, Angelo M DiBello, Melissa R Hatch, Andrew P Weinstein, Clayton Neighbors
Objective: Young adults in college engage in risky drinking that results in alcohol-related harms. Most evidence-based prevention interventions recommended for this population rely on correcting exaggerated drinking norms via personalized normative feedback (PNF). Informed by an extensive literature linking alcohol attitudes and drinking behavior, we adapted a brief counter-attitudinal advocacy (CAA) task to the alcohol prevention context. The goal of this study is to evaluate the ability of CAA in changing drinking and related consequences and to explore the comparative efficacy of CAA versus PNF.
Method: This two-site randomized controlled trial had two experimental conditions (CAA and PNF) and an assessment-only control condition. Participants were 585 students who reported heavy episodic drinking and ≥ 2 alcohol-related negative consequences. Alcohol outcomes were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups to test hypotheses that the CAA and PNF manipulations will decrease drinks per week, typical drinks per day, peak blood alcohol concentration, and alcohol consequences, relative to control.
Results: Participants reported reductions in drinks per week, typical drinks, and alcohol consequences. Those who received PNF reported significantly fewer drinks per week than controls, whereas those who received CAA reported significantly fewer consequences than controls. The CAA and PNF conditions did not differ from one another.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates an application of attitude change theory and CAA methods to the alcohol prevention context, across demographically different settings. The novel CAA task had a harm reduction effect on consequences but not consumption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Efficacy of counter-attitudinal advocacy and personalized feedback for heavy-drinking college students.","authors":"Kate B Carey, Angelo M DiBello, Melissa R Hatch, Andrew P Weinstein, Clayton Neighbors","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Young adults in college engage in risky drinking that results in alcohol-related harms. Most evidence-based prevention interventions recommended for this population rely on correcting exaggerated drinking norms via personalized normative feedback (PNF). Informed by an extensive literature linking alcohol attitudes and drinking behavior, we adapted a brief counter-attitudinal advocacy (CAA) task to the alcohol prevention context. The goal of this study is to evaluate the ability of CAA in changing drinking and related consequences and to explore the comparative efficacy of CAA versus PNF.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This two-site randomized controlled trial had two experimental conditions (CAA and PNF) and an assessment-only control condition. Participants were 585 students who reported heavy episodic drinking and ≥ 2 alcohol-related negative consequences. Alcohol outcomes were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups to test hypotheses that the CAA and PNF manipulations will decrease drinks per week, typical drinks per day, peak blood alcohol concentration, and alcohol consequences, relative to control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported reductions in drinks per week, typical drinks, and alcohol consequences. Those who received PNF reported significantly fewer drinks per week than controls, whereas those who received CAA reported significantly fewer consequences than controls. The CAA and PNF conditions did not differ from one another.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an application of attitude change theory and CAA methods to the alcohol prevention context, across demographically different settings. The novel CAA task had a harm reduction effect on consequences but not consumption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143624866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eric Stice, Paul Rohde, Sonja Yokum, Cara Bohon, Heather Shaw
Several researchers who have evaluated Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) wrote a commentary arguing that the group-delivered IPT treatment for eating disorders that we adapted and used in a recent trial (Stice, Rohde, et al., 2023) was less effective than the new dissonance-based eating disorder treatment (Body Project Treatment) because the group-delivered IPT did not contain all core elements, was not developmentally appropriate, was not tailored for people with eating disorders, and because our team lacked sufficient IPT expertise. In response, we note that the group-delivered IPT that we evaluated produced higher abstinence from binge eating and compensatory weight control behaviors (40%) than did individually delivered IPT in the only trial that also evaluated this treatment with a broad range of eating disorders (33%; Fairburn et al., 2015). The fact that the group-delivered IPT produced a higher abstinence rate than individually delivered IPT for a similar spectrum of patients appears to refute the stated concerns regarding the group-delivered version of IPT because it was not less effective than individually delivered IPT. We argue it is critical to establish that a treatment significantly outperforms alternative treatments with a distinct intervention target because only an active comparator controls for the potential confounds that can drive improvement in trials, including expectancies, demand characteristics, and nonspecific therapeutic effects. We also note that IPT for the treatment of eating disorders has not significantly outperformed three alternative treatments and that the evidence base for IPT may thus be driven by expectancies, demand characteristics, and nonspecific effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Response to \"Considerations in selecting comparison conditions in psychotherapy trials: Recommendations for future research\".","authors":"Eric Stice, Paul Rohde, Sonja Yokum, Cara Bohon, Heather Shaw","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several researchers who have evaluated <i>Interpersonal Psychotherapy</i> (IPT) wrote a commentary arguing that the group-delivered IPT treatment for eating disorders that we adapted and used in a recent trial (Stice, Rohde, et al., 2023) was less effective than the new dissonance-based eating disorder treatment (<i>Body Project Treatment</i>) because the group-delivered IPT did not contain all core elements, was not developmentally appropriate, was not tailored for people with eating disorders, and because our team lacked sufficient IPT expertise. In response, we note that the group-delivered IPT that we evaluated produced higher abstinence from binge eating and compensatory weight control behaviors (40%) than did individually delivered IPT in the only trial that also evaluated this treatment with a broad range of eating disorders (33%; Fairburn et al., 2015). The fact that the group-delivered IPT produced a higher abstinence rate than individually delivered IPT for a similar spectrum of patients appears to refute the stated concerns regarding the group-delivered version of IPT because it was not less effective than individually delivered IPT. We argue it is critical to establish that a treatment significantly outperforms alternative treatments with a distinct intervention target because only an active comparator controls for the potential confounds that can drive improvement in trials, including expectancies, demand characteristics, and nonspecific therapeutic effects. We also note that IPT for the treatment of eating disorders has not significantly outperformed three alternative treatments and that the evidence base for IPT may thus be driven by expectancies, demand characteristics, and nonspecific effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}