eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.

S. Ghozy, Abdullah Ramzan, Hassan Kobeissi, A. S. Motawei, Mariam Abdelghaffar, A. Dmytriw, D. Kallmes, R. Kadirvel
{"title":"eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.","authors":"S. Ghozy, Abdullah Ramzan, Hassan Kobeissi, A. S. Motawei, Mariam Abdelghaffar, A. Dmytriw, D. Kallmes, R. Kadirvel","doi":"10.1177/19714009241247463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nWide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are a subtype of aneurysms that are especially complex to treat. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available literature on the safety and efficacy of employing endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) in the treatment of WNBAs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe report this study in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried for this review. Screening and extraction were performed by at least two authors to ensure accuracy and completeness, and a senior author arbitrated any discrepancies. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.0. and random-effects model.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFour studies were finally included, of which three were prospective and one was retrospective. Successful adjunctive coiling occurred in 91.38% (95% CI = 70.71-97.9) of cases and overall technical success was achieved in 88.61% (95 CI = 75.54-95.15) of cases. The pooled complete occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I) was 50.65% (95% CI = 39.63-61.60) and adequate occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I/II) was 84.42% (95% CI = 74.53-90.93). Thrombo-embolic complication had a pooled rate of 1.22% (95% CI = 0.17-8.15), retreatment rate was 6.10% (95% CI = 2.56-13.83), and mortality reported in 3.66% (95% CI = 1.18-10.74) of patients.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe use of eCLIPs may be a safe and efficacious treatment for WNBAs. Future randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation of the findings.","PeriodicalId":371045,"journal":{"name":"The Neuroradiology Journal","volume":"7 4","pages":"19714009241247463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241247463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are a subtype of aneurysms that are especially complex to treat. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available literature on the safety and efficacy of employing endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) in the treatment of WNBAs. METHODS We report this study in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried for this review. Screening and extraction were performed by at least two authors to ensure accuracy and completeness, and a senior author arbitrated any discrepancies. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.0. and random-effects model. RESULTS Four studies were finally included, of which three were prospective and one was retrospective. Successful adjunctive coiling occurred in 91.38% (95% CI = 70.71-97.9) of cases and overall technical success was achieved in 88.61% (95 CI = 75.54-95.15) of cases. The pooled complete occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I) was 50.65% (95% CI = 39.63-61.60) and adequate occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I/II) was 84.42% (95% CI = 74.53-90.93). Thrombo-embolic complication had a pooled rate of 1.22% (95% CI = 0.17-8.15), retreatment rate was 6.10% (95% CI = 2.56-13.83), and mortality reported in 3.66% (95% CI = 1.18-10.74) of patients. CONCLUSION The use of eCLIPs may be a safe and efficacious treatment for WNBAs. Future randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation of the findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于治疗宽颈分叉动脉瘤的 eCLIPs 分叉重塑系统:安全性和有效性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景宽颈分叉动脉瘤(WNBA)是动脉瘤的一种亚型,治疗起来尤为复杂。我们旨在进行一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以综合现有文献中关于采用血管内夹系统(eCLIPs)治疗 WNBAs 的安全性和有效性的内容。方法我们根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses,PRISMA)2020 指南报告本研究。本综述检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus。筛选和提取工作至少由两位作者完成,以确保准确性和完整性,并由一位资深作者对任何差异进行仲裁。所有数据均使用 R 软件 4.3.0 版和随机效应模型进行分析。结果最终纳入了四项研究,其中三项为前瞻性研究,一项为回顾性研究。91.38%(95% CI = 70.71-97.9)的病例成功进行了辅助卷曲,88.61%(95 CI = 75.54-95.15)的病例取得了总体技术成功。总的完全闭塞率(Raymond-Roy I级)为50.65%(95% CI = 39.63-61.60),充分闭塞率(Raymond-Roy I/II级)为84.42%(95% CI = 74.53-90.93)。血栓栓塞并发症的总发生率为 1.22% (95% CI = 0.17-8.15),再治疗率为 6.10% (95% CI = 2.56-13.83),死亡率为 3.66% (95% CI = 1.18-10.74)。今后需要进行随机对照试验来进一步验证研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetic ketoacidosis with central nervous system involvement: Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings. Arachnoid cyst in the pediatric patient: What the radiologist needs to know. Ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. Stent plus balloon-assisted coiling with low-profile braided stents in the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1