Perceptions of women on sexuality, intimacy, andhealth-related quality of life during the COVID-19 epidemic

Q3 Nursing Journal of Health Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.17532/jhs.2024.2257
Katja Lenarčič, Anita Jug Došler, A. P. Mivšek
{"title":"Perceptions of women on sexuality, intimacy, andhealth-related quality of life during the COVID-19 epidemic","authors":"Katja Lenarčič, Anita Jug Došler, A. P. Mivšek","doi":"10.17532/jhs.2024.2257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 epidemic and its restrictions have affected all aspects of people’s lives, including health-related quality of life and, considering sexuality as an integral part of individual needs, also intimacy and sexuality. Therefore, the aim of this article was to investigate women’s sexual functioning and health-related quality of life assessment in Slovenian women in the reproductive period.\nMethods: An online survey with valid questionnaires (short form 36 [SF-36] and Female sexual function index [FSFI-19]) was conducted in January 2022. All research ethical measures were taken to ensure the integrity of the participants.\nResults: The FSFI scale score was 25.37 ± 8.29, 1.18 points above the cutoff point, indicating a higher risk of sexual dysfunction (26.55). The estimated prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 36.8%, with sexual desire being the most problematic area. The mean score on the SF-36 scale in our sample reached 73.52 ± 13.84 on a 100-point scale, with 0 representing the worst and 100 the best quality of life; fatigue (x̅ = 48.50) was the most problematic category. The results partly reflect the results of foreign studies, but we must be aware of cultural differences in the understanding of sexuality and keep in mind that some countries faced difficult circumstances during the COVID-19 pandemic and that social constraints were different in 2020 than in 2022.\nConclusion: The epidemic affected the sexual function of women of reproductive age and their perception of (health-related) quality of life.","PeriodicalId":15927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17532/jhs.2024.2257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 epidemic and its restrictions have affected all aspects of people’s lives, including health-related quality of life and, considering sexuality as an integral part of individual needs, also intimacy and sexuality. Therefore, the aim of this article was to investigate women’s sexual functioning and health-related quality of life assessment in Slovenian women in the reproductive period. Methods: An online survey with valid questionnaires (short form 36 [SF-36] and Female sexual function index [FSFI-19]) was conducted in January 2022. All research ethical measures were taken to ensure the integrity of the participants. Results: The FSFI scale score was 25.37 ± 8.29, 1.18 points above the cutoff point, indicating a higher risk of sexual dysfunction (26.55). The estimated prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 36.8%, with sexual desire being the most problematic area. The mean score on the SF-36 scale in our sample reached 73.52 ± 13.84 on a 100-point scale, with 0 representing the worst and 100 the best quality of life; fatigue (x̅ = 48.50) was the most problematic category. The results partly reflect the results of foreign studies, but we must be aware of cultural differences in the understanding of sexuality and keep in mind that some countries faced difficult circumstances during the COVID-19 pandemic and that social constraints were different in 2020 than in 2022. Conclusion: The epidemic affected the sexual function of women of reproductive age and their perception of (health-related) quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 流行期间妇女对性、亲密关系和与健康相关的生活质量的看法
导言:COVID-19 的流行及其限制影响了人们生活的方方面面,包括与健康相关的生活质量,考虑到性是个人需求不可分割的一部分,还包括亲密关系和性行为。因此,本文旨在调查斯洛文尼亚生育期妇女的性功能和与健康相关的生活质量评估:方法:2022 年 1 月,使用有效问卷(简表 36 [SF-36] 和女性性功能指数 [FSFI-19])进行了在线调查。调查采取了所有研究伦理措施,以确保参与者的完整性:FSFI量表得分为25.37±8.29,比临界点高1.18分,表明性功能障碍的风险较高(26.55)。性功能障碍的患病率估计为 36.8%,其中性欲是最容易出现问题的方面。在我们的样本中,SF-36 量表的平均得分为 73.52±13.84 分(100 分制),0 分代表最差的生活质量,100 分代表最好的生活质量;疲劳(x̅ = 48.50)是问题最多的一项。这些结果部分反映了国外的研究结果,但我们必须意识到对性的理解存在文化差异,并牢记一些国家在 COVID-19 大流行期间面临着困难的环境,而且 2020 年的社会制约因素与 2022 年不同:疫情影响了育龄妇女的性功能及其对(与健康相关的)生活质量的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Sciences
Journal of Health Sciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical and radiologic features in patients with the WHO grade I and II meningiomas The relationship of limited mobility of the cervical spinewith postural and mental reactions of students Perceptions of women on sexuality, intimacy, andhealth-related quality of life during the COVID-19 epidemic The effect of a six-week home physiotherapy program on symptoms and activities of daily living in post-COVID-19 patients following hospital discharge Measurement of palliative care competencies using PALCOM instrument
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1