Right to a modern trial: A new principle on the horizon of the digital age

Q4 Social Sciences Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1556/2052.2023.00467
András Osztovits
{"title":"Right to a modern trial: A new principle on the horizon of the digital age","authors":"András Osztovits","doi":"10.1556/2052.2023.00467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study presents the most important common features of current judicial systems and argues that the courts are finding it more difficult to fulfil their role in the 21st century in a changing social and economic context. The development of information technology is also challenging the courts, which can only respond adequately by bringing modern technology into the courts themselves, allowing clients to access the courts online, outside office hours, and to receive meaningful, fast and efficient assistance in resolving their disputes. The study proposes that, in addition to the right to a fair trial, the right to a modern trial should be a requirement for the state to ensure that these requirements are met. These two principles, complementing each other, would help to ensure access to justice for clients in the 21st century. The adoption and implementation of this new principle will require a number of legal and technological changes. Yet it is not their implementation that seems the most difficult, but a change in the general legal thinking about the functioning of the courts, according to which the court is primarily a physical place where disputes are settled, and its role is not to provide a wide range of services, but only to deliver judgments.","PeriodicalId":37649,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study presents the most important common features of current judicial systems and argues that the courts are finding it more difficult to fulfil their role in the 21st century in a changing social and economic context. The development of information technology is also challenging the courts, which can only respond adequately by bringing modern technology into the courts themselves, allowing clients to access the courts online, outside office hours, and to receive meaningful, fast and efficient assistance in resolving their disputes. The study proposes that, in addition to the right to a fair trial, the right to a modern trial should be a requirement for the state to ensure that these requirements are met. These two principles, complementing each other, would help to ensure access to justice for clients in the 21st century. The adoption and implementation of this new principle will require a number of legal and technological changes. Yet it is not their implementation that seems the most difficult, but a change in the general legal thinking about the functioning of the courts, according to which the court is primarily a physical place where disputes are settled, and its role is not to provide a wide range of services, but only to deliver judgments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代审判权:数字时代地平线上的一项新原则
本研究介绍了当前司法系统最重要的共同特征,并认为在 21 世纪不断变化的社会和经济背景下,法院越来越难以发挥其作用。信息技术的发展也对法院提出了挑战,法院只有通过将现代技术引入法院本身,使当事人能够在办公时间之外在线诉诸法院,并在解决纠纷时获得有意义、快速和高效的援助,才能充分应对挑战。研究报告建议,除了公平审判权之外,现代审判权也应成为国家确保满足这些要求的一项要求。这两项原则相辅相成,将有助于确保当事人在 21 世纪能够诉诸司法。要采纳和实施这一新原则,需要进行一系列法律和技术变革。然而,最困难的似乎并不是实施这些原则,而是改变有关法院职能的一般法律思维,根据这种思维,法院主要是一个解决争端的有形场所,其作用不是提供广泛的服务,而仅仅是作出判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Acta Juridica presents the achievements of the legal sciences and legal scholars in Hungary and details of the Hungarian legislation and legal literature. The journal accepts articles from every field of the legal sciences. Recently, the editors have encouraged contributions from outside Hungary, with the aim of covering the legal sciences in the whole of Central and Eastern Europe. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Right to a modern trial: A new principle on the horizon of the digital age Internal dispute resolution systems: Do high promises come with higher expectations? Large language models and their possible uses in law Editorial: Challenges of children's rights “Humanity's new frontier”: Human rights implications of artificial intelligence and new technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1