DO seniors and IMGs have lower match probabilities than MD seniors after adjusting for specialty choice and USMLE Step 1 score.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0143
D. Nikolla, Kaitlin M. Bowers, Brittany Smith, Christina L Elsayed, Abigail Daniels, Thomas Sandoval, Kyle J Hitchman, Irtaza Asar, Dillon C Kolacz, Vishnu Mudrakola
{"title":"DO seniors and IMGs have lower match probabilities than MD seniors after adjusting for specialty choice and USMLE Step 1 score.","authors":"D. Nikolla, Kaitlin M. Bowers, Brittany Smith, Christina L Elsayed, Abigail Daniels, Thomas Sandoval, Kyle J Hitchman, Irtaza Asar, Dillon C Kolacz, Vishnu Mudrakola","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nIt is unknown if US residency applicants of different educational backgrounds (US allopathic [MD], Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO], and international medical graduates [IMG]) but comparable academic performance have similar match success.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nOur objective was to compare match probabilities between applicant types after adjusting for specialty choice and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe performed a secondary analysis of published data in National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) reports from 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 for US MD seniors, DO seniors, and IMGs (US citizens and non-US citizens). We examined the 10 specialties with the most available spots in 2022. Average marginal effects from a multiple variable logistic regression model were utilized to estimate each non-MD senior applicant type's probability of matching into their preferred specialty compared to MD seniors adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEach non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching to their preferred specialty than MD seniors, -7.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], -11.3 to -2.9) for DO seniors, -45.6 % (-50.6 to -40.5) for US IMGs, and -56.6 % (-61.5 to -51.6) for non-US IMGs. Similarly, each non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching than MD seniors across almost all Step 1 score ranges, except for DO seniors with Step 1 scores <200 (-2.0 % [-9.5 to 5.5]).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAfter adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year, non-US MD applicants had lower probabilities of matching into their preferred specialties than their US MD colleagues.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT It is unknown if US residency applicants of different educational backgrounds (US allopathic [MD], Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO], and international medical graduates [IMG]) but comparable academic performance have similar match success. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to compare match probabilities between applicant types after adjusting for specialty choice and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of published data in National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) reports from 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 for US MD seniors, DO seniors, and IMGs (US citizens and non-US citizens). We examined the 10 specialties with the most available spots in 2022. Average marginal effects from a multiple variable logistic regression model were utilized to estimate each non-MD senior applicant type's probability of matching into their preferred specialty compared to MD seniors adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year. RESULTS Each non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching to their preferred specialty than MD seniors, -7.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], -11.3 to -2.9) for DO seniors, -45.6 % (-50.6 to -40.5) for US IMGs, and -56.6 % (-61.5 to -51.6) for non-US IMGs. Similarly, each non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching than MD seniors across almost all Step 1 score ranges, except for DO seniors with Step 1 scores <200 (-2.0 % [-9.5 to 5.5]). CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year, non-US MD applicants had lower probabilities of matching into their preferred specialties than their US MD colleagues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在对专业选择和 USMLE 第 1 步分数进行调整后,高年级 DO 和 IMG 的匹配概率低于高年级 MD。
内容我们不知道具有不同教育背景(美国全科医学[MD]、骨科医学博士[DO]和国际医学毕业生[IMG])但学业成绩相当的美国住院医师申请者是否有相似的匹配成功率。我们对国家住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)2016、2018、2020 和 2022 年报告中公布的美国医学博士、骨科医生和 IMG(美国公民和非美国公民)的数据进行了二次分析。我们研究了 2022 年可用名额最多的 10 个专业。我们利用多变量逻辑回归模型得出的平均边际效应来估算每种非医学博士高年级申请人类型与医学博士高年级申请人相比匹配到其首选专科的概率,并对专科选择、第 1 步分数和匹配年份进行调整。结果与医学博士高年级学生相比,每种非医学博士申请者类型匹配到其首选专科的调整后百分比差异都较低,其中直肠指诊高年级学生为-7.1%(95%置信区间[CI],-11.3 至-2.9),美国 IMG 为-45.6%(-50.6 至-40.5),非美国 IMG 为-56.6%(-61.5 至-51.6)。同样,在几乎所有步骤 1 分数范围内,每种非医学博士申请人类型的调整后匹配百分比差异都低于医学博士高年级学生,但步骤 1 分数小于 200 分的 DO 高年级学生除外(-2.0 % [-9.5 至 5.5])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
NIR Excitation in Atomically Precise Nanoclusters via Two-Photon and Three-Photon Absorption. Transition-Metal Hydride Catalysis Meets Nitrenoid Transfer: Design Principles for Precision C–N Bond Formation Molecular Probes: From Aβ Imaging to Phototherapy in Alzheimer's Disease. Resonance Variation-Based Dynamically Adaptive Organic Optoelectronic Materials. Photophysics of Organic Fluorophore Photobluing and Its Applications in Fluorescence and Super-Resolution Microscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1