首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Osteopathic Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
The role of osteopathic manipulative treatment for dystonia: a literature review. 整骨疗法对肌张力障碍的作用:文献综述。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0094
Davong D Phrathep, Zach Abdo, Mariam Tadros, Emily Lewandowski, John Evans
<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dystonia is a movement disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions leading to abnormal movements and postures, such as twisting. Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder in the United States, with as many as 250,000 people affected. Because of its complexity, dystonia presents a significant challenge in terms of management and treatment. Despite limited research, osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been considered as an adjunctive treatment due to its inexpensive and noninvasive nature, as opposed to other modalities such as botulinum toxin injections, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation, which are often expensive and inaccessible. OMT treatments performed in case studies and series such as balanced ligamentous tension/articular ligamentous strain (BLT/ALS), muscle energy (ME), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA), and myofascial release (MFR) have shown reduction of pain and muscle hypertonicity, including in patients with dystonia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The studies reviewed in this paper provide a snapshot of the literature regarding the current evidence of OMT's role for dystonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A medical reference librarian conducted a thorough literature search across multiple databases including PubMed and Google Scholar to find articles relevant to the use of OMT for dystonia. The search employed a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to osteopathic medicine and dystonia to ensure precise retrieval of relevant articles within the last 20 years. Despite limited research on the topic, all four relevant reports found in the literature were selected for review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the four relevant reports, case series and studies highlighted the potential benefits of OMT in managing dystonia, particularly cervical dystonia and foot dystonia. OMT has shown promising results addressing pain, stiffness, and impaired motor function. In cases of foot dystonia in Parkinson's disease, OMT has helped improve gait and reduce pain by targeting somatic dysfunctions (SDs) associated with dystonia, such as abnormalities in foot progression angle (FPA) and musculoskeletal imbalances. Also, OMT has been found to alleviate symptoms of cervical dystonia, including tremors, muscle spasms, and neck stiffness. These interventions performed in case studies and series led to improvements in gait biomechanics in foot dystonia and overall symptom severity in patients with cervical dystonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, botulinum toxin, oral medications, physical therapy, and rehabilitation are commonly utilized in managing dystonia. The studies reviewed in this paper suggest that these treatments may lead to improvements in pain and muscle hypertonicity in patients with dystonia. It is important to investigate whether factors such as the type of dystonia (eg, focal vs. segmental) a
背景:肌张力障碍是一种运动障碍疾病,会引起肌肉不自主收缩,导致异常动作和姿势,如扭动。肌张力障碍是美国第三大最常见的运动障碍,患者多达 25 万人。由于其复杂性,肌张力障碍在管理和治疗方面提出了巨大的挑战。尽管研究有限,但骨科手法治疗(OMT)因其廉价和非侵入性的特点,已被认为是一种辅助治疗方法,而肉毒素注射、脑深部刺激(DBS)和经颅磁刺激等其他方法通常价格昂贵且难以使用。在病例研究和系列研究中进行的 OMT 治疗,如平衡韧带张力/关节韧带拉伤(BLT/ALS)、肌肉能量(ME)、高速度低振幅(HVLA)和肌筋膜松解(MFR)等,都显示出疼痛和肌肉张力过高的减轻,包括肌张力障碍患者:本文回顾的研究提供了有关 OMT 在肌张力障碍中作用的现有证据的文献快照:一位医学参考图书管理员在多个数据库(包括 PubMed 和 Google Scholar)中进行了全面的文献检索,以找到与使用 OMT 治疗肌张力障碍相关的文章。该检索结合使用了医学主题词表(MeSH)中与整骨疗法和肌张力障碍相关的术语和关键词,以确保精确检索到过去 20 年内的相关文章。尽管对该主题的研究有限,但还是选择了文献中发现的所有四篇相关报告进行综述:结果:在四篇相关报告中,病例系列和研究强调了局部治疗法在治疗肌张力障碍方面的潜在益处,尤其是颈部肌张力障碍和足部肌张力障碍。在治疗疼痛、僵硬和运动功能受损方面,OMT 显示出了良好的效果。在帕金森病患者的足部肌张力障碍病例中,通过针对与肌张力障碍相关的躯体功能障碍(SDs),如足前倾角度(FPA)异常和肌肉骨骼失衡,OMT 有助于改善步态和减轻疼痛。此外,还发现 OMT 可减轻颈肌张力障碍的症状,包括震颤、肌肉痉挛和颈部僵硬。在病例研究和系列研究中进行的这些干预措施改善了足部肌张力障碍患者的步态生物力学以及颈肌张力障碍患者的整体症状严重程度:目前,肉毒毒素、口服药物、物理治疗和康复治疗是治疗肌张力障碍的常用方法。本文回顾的研究表明,这些治疗方法可改善肌张力障碍患者的疼痛和肌肉张力过高。研究肌张力障碍的类型(如局灶性与节段性)及其潜在病因(如特发性、创伤、感染、自身免疫、药物副作用)等因素是否会影响治疗效果非常重要。建议进一步研究探讨 OMT 在肌张力障碍治疗中的作用。
{"title":"The role of osteopathic manipulative treatment for dystonia: a literature review.","authors":"Davong D Phrathep, Zach Abdo, Mariam Tadros, Emily Lewandowski, John Evans","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0094","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context: &lt;/strong&gt;Dystonia is a movement disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions leading to abnormal movements and postures, such as twisting. Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder in the United States, with as many as 250,000 people affected. Because of its complexity, dystonia presents a significant challenge in terms of management and treatment. Despite limited research, osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been considered as an adjunctive treatment due to its inexpensive and noninvasive nature, as opposed to other modalities such as botulinum toxin injections, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation, which are often expensive and inaccessible. OMT treatments performed in case studies and series such as balanced ligamentous tension/articular ligamentous strain (BLT/ALS), muscle energy (ME), high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA), and myofascial release (MFR) have shown reduction of pain and muscle hypertonicity, including in patients with dystonia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;The studies reviewed in this paper provide a snapshot of the literature regarding the current evidence of OMT's role for dystonia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A medical reference librarian conducted a thorough literature search across multiple databases including PubMed and Google Scholar to find articles relevant to the use of OMT for dystonia. The search employed a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to osteopathic medicine and dystonia to ensure precise retrieval of relevant articles within the last 20 years. Despite limited research on the topic, all four relevant reports found in the literature were selected for review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of the four relevant reports, case series and studies highlighted the potential benefits of OMT in managing dystonia, particularly cervical dystonia and foot dystonia. OMT has shown promising results addressing pain, stiffness, and impaired motor function. In cases of foot dystonia in Parkinson's disease, OMT has helped improve gait and reduce pain by targeting somatic dysfunctions (SDs) associated with dystonia, such as abnormalities in foot progression angle (FPA) and musculoskeletal imbalances. Also, OMT has been found to alleviate symptoms of cervical dystonia, including tremors, muscle spasms, and neck stiffness. These interventions performed in case studies and series led to improvements in gait biomechanics in foot dystonia and overall symptom severity in patients with cervical dystonia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Currently, botulinum toxin, oral medications, physical therapy, and rehabilitation are commonly utilized in managing dystonia. The studies reviewed in this paper suggest that these treatments may lead to improvements in pain and muscle hypertonicity in patients with dystonia. It is important to investigate whether factors such as the type of dystonia (eg, focal vs. segmental) a","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings. 改善外周动脉疾病的筛查和治疗:可在多种医疗环境中使用的筛查、诊断和治疗工具。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0050
Kelly M Rudd, Kristie K Roberts, Cooper M Hamilton

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease that contributes to significant morbidity and mortality, including loss of limb, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death. Treatment options are often underutilized. A major limiting factor in PAD care is the ability to efficiently identify and screen at-risk patients. A PAD patient screening and clinician decision support tool was created to improve access to high-quality, evidence-based care to drive improved clinical outcomes. The tool identifies known PAD risk factors and presenting symptoms, in combination with objective data obtained via the ankle-brachial index (ABI). The tool utilizes this data to drive PAD diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment, and it is adaptable across multiple care settings, by varied health professions. The implementation of a PAD screening and treatment toolkit enhances anticoagulation and PAD stewardship, and it has been integrated into use across various care settings.

外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一种动脉粥样硬化性疾病,可导致严重的发病率和死亡率,包括肢体缺失、心肌梗死(MI)、中风和死亡。治疗方案往往未得到充分利用。PAD 护理的一个主要限制因素是有效识别和筛查高危患者的能力。我们创建了一个 PAD 患者筛查和临床医生决策支持工具,以提高获得高质量循证护理的机会,从而改善临床疗效。该工具结合通过踝肱指数(ABI)获得的客观数据,识别已知的 PAD 危险因素和主要症状。该工具利用这些数据来推动 PAD 诊断、风险评估和治疗,并可适用于多种医疗环境和不同的医疗专业。PAD 筛查和治疗工具包的实施加强了抗凝和 PAD 管理,并已在各种护理环境中整合使用。
{"title":"Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings.","authors":"Kelly M Rudd, Kristie K Roberts, Cooper M Hamilton","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic disease that contributes to significant morbidity and mortality, including loss of limb, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death. Treatment options are often underutilized. A major limiting factor in PAD care is the ability to efficiently identify and screen at-risk patients. A PAD patient screening and clinician decision support tool was created to improve access to high-quality, evidence-based care to drive improved clinical outcomes. The tool identifies known PAD risk factors and presenting symptoms, in combination with objective data obtained via the ankle-brachial index (ABI). The tool utilizes this data to drive PAD diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment, and it is adaptable across multiple care settings, by varied health professions. The implementation of a PAD screening and treatment toolkit enhances anticoagulation and PAD stewardship, and it has been integrated into use across various care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion. 强心计划完成两年后的效果。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0083
Bruce E Murphy, Peyton D Card, Leybi Ramirez-Kelly, Brandon Wensley, Robert E Heidel

Context: This is a follow-up to the original published article, Effects of the Strong Hearts Program after a Major Cardiovascular Event in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Objectives: This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of the Strong Hearts program up to 2 years after program completion.

Methods: All study participants who initially completed the Strong Hearts program between 2020 and 2021 (n=128) were contacted at 12 months and 24 months following the date of program completion. A phone survey was conducted to see if any significant post-cardiovascular events or readmissions to the hospital occurred, and self-reported dates of any occurrences were recorded. Hospital readmissions and cardiac-related procedures were cross-referenced with the hospital's electronic medical record. A chi-square goodness-of-fit analysis was utilized to compare the observed rates of categorical outcomes vs. expected rates yielded from the empirical literature.

Results: The rate of all-cause readmission at 6 months post-program completion was 2/120 (1.7 %), compared to the expected rate of 50 %, χ2(1) = 112.13, p<0.001. The readmission rate at 1 year post-program completion was 17/120 (14.2 %), vs. the expected rate of 45 %, χ2(1) = 46.09, p<0.001, and at 2 years post-program completion, the readmission rate was 24/120 (20.0 %) compared to the expected rate of 53.8 %, χ2(1) = 56.43, p<0.001. Ten participants (8.3 %) had a subsequent cardiac procedure within 2 years of completing the program, including two requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (1.7 %) and eight requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, 6.7 %), compared to the expected rates of 13.4 and 57.74 %, χ2(1)=153.08, p<0.001, respectively. Mortality at 2 years post-program completion was 2/128 (1.6 %), compared to 23.4 %, χ2(1)=34.13, p<0.001.

Conclusions: Efficacy of the Strong Hearts program continued at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-program completion in terms of all-cause readmission, subsequent cardiac event, and all-cause mortality.

背景:这是对最初发表的文章《心血管疾病患者重大心血管事件后的强心计划效果》的后续研究:本研究评估了 "强心计划 "在计划完成后两年内的长期疗效:在项目完成后的 12 个月和 24 个月,与 2020 年至 2021 年间初步完成 Strong Hearts 项目的所有研究参与者(128 人)取得联系。他们接受了电话调查,以了解是否发生了重大心血管事件或再次入院,并记录了自我报告的发生日期。再入院情况和心脏相关程序与医院的电子病历进行了交叉对比。利用卡方拟合优度分析将观察到的分类结果比率与经验文献得出的预期比率进行比较:结果:计划完成后 6 个月的全因再入院率为 2/120(1.7%),而预期率为 50%,χ2(1) = 112.13,p2(1) = 46.09,p2(1) = 56.43,p2(1)=153.08,p2(1)=34.13,p结论:在全因再入院、后续心脏事件和全因死亡率方面,"强心 "计划的疗效在计划完成后的 6 个月、1 年和 2 年仍在持续。
{"title":"Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion.","authors":"Bruce E Murphy, Peyton D Card, Leybi Ramirez-Kelly, Brandon Wensley, Robert E Heidel","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0083","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jom-2024-0083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>This is a follow-up to the original published article, Effects of the Strong Hearts Program after a Major Cardiovascular Event in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of the Strong Hearts program up to 2 years after program completion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All study participants who initially completed the Strong Hearts program between 2020 and 2021 (n=128) were contacted at 12 months and 24 months following the date of program completion. A phone survey was conducted to see if any significant post-cardiovascular events or readmissions to the hospital occurred, and self-reported dates of any occurrences were recorded. Hospital readmissions and cardiac-related procedures were cross-referenced with the hospital's electronic medical record. A chi-square goodness-of-fit analysis was utilized to compare the observed rates of categorical outcomes vs. expected rates yielded from the empirical literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of all-cause readmission at 6 months post-program completion was 2/120 (1.7 %), compared to the expected rate of 50 %, χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 112.13, p<0.001. The readmission rate at 1 year post-program completion was 17/120 (14.2 %), vs. the expected rate of 45 %, χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 46.09, p<0.001, and at 2 years post-program completion, the readmission rate was 24/120 (20.0 %) compared to the expected rate of 53.8 %, χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 56.43, p<0.001. Ten participants (8.3 %) had a subsequent cardiac procedure within 2 years of completing the program, including two requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (1.7 %) and eight requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, 6.7 %), compared to the expected rates of 13.4 and 57.74 %, χ<sup>2</sup>(1)=153.08, p<0.001, respectively. Mortality at 2 years post-program completion was 2/128 (1.6 %), compared to 23.4 %, χ<sup>2</sup>(1)=34.13, p<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy of the Strong Hearts program continued at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-program completion in terms of all-cause readmission, subsequent cardiac event, and all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey. 骨科医学生对泌尿外科临床前接触的看法:一项单一机构横断面调查。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0284
Ryan Wong, Harvey N Mayrovitz

Context: There is an increasing number of medical school graduates opting for surgical specialties, and the osteopathic applicant match rate for urology is lower than that of allopathic applicants. Factors influencing this may include a lack of interest, perceived challenges in matching into urology, insufficient urology mentorship, limited research opportunities, and inadequate osteopathic representation in urology.

Objectives: The objective of this survey is to assess osteopathic medical students' perspectives on pursuing urology and enhancing preclinical exposure to and knowledge of urology.

Methods: A 20-question survey addressing experiences and the factors influencing osteopathic medical students' specialty selection and their interest in and perception of urology was designed by the investigators on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. This survey was distributed via email listserv to all current osteopathic medical students attending Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine over 2 months. Responses were collected and analyzed utilizing Fisher's exact test.

Results: Among 150 respondents, 91 % found mentors crucial in selecting a medical specialty, 95 % emphasized the importance of early exposure, and 68 % lacked familiarity with urology, with more M1 students unfamiliar with urology compared to M2 (70.4 % vs. 59 %). A larger proportion of combined M1 and M2 (preclinical) students are considering urology as a specialty compared to M3 and M4 (clinical) students who are actively on rotations (56.5 % vs. 28.6 %; p=0.0064). Also, a greater percentage of males are considering urology compared to females (64.2 % vs. 42.7 %; p=0.0164). Among those considering urology (n=75), 57.3 % lack awareness of urology's scope, and 84 % report no preclinical discussions with urologists. Those students who report that they are considering urology value early exposure significantly more than others (98.7 % vs. 78.7 %; p=0.0001). They also express greater interest in having a core urology course (73.3 % vs. 38.7 %; p<0.0001). More urology-considering students are interested in extracurricular urology-related workshops, seminars, or conferences (61.3 % vs. 17.3 %; p<0.0001). Students who are considering urology as a specialty show greater interest in having a mentorship program (85.3 % vs. 28 %; p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Results suggested that increased urology exposure during the preclinical years is important. Urology elective offerings and urology mentorship are of high interest among those considering urology. However, additional investigation is needed to determine the impact of preclinical urology curricula implementation on urology match outcomes.

背景:越来越多的医学院毕业生选择外科专业,而骨科医生申请泌尿外科的匹配率低于全科医生申请者。影响因素可能包括缺乏兴趣、认为泌尿外科匹配存在挑战、泌尿外科导师不足、研究机会有限以及泌尿外科的骨科医生代表不足:本调查旨在评估骨科医学生对攻读泌尿外科以及加强临床前接触和了解泌尿外科的看法:研究人员利用研究电子数据采集(REDCap)软件设计了一项包含 20 个问题的调查,内容涉及影响骨科医学生专业选择的经验和因素,以及他们对泌尿外科的兴趣和看法。该调查通过电子邮件列表服务向诺瓦东南大学基兰-帕特尔骨科医学院的所有骨科医学生发放,为期两个月。收集到的回复采用费雪精确检验法进行分析:在150名受访者中,91%的人认为导师对选择医学专业至关重要,95%的人强调早期接触的重要性,68%的人不熟悉泌尿科,与M2相比,更多的M1学生不熟悉泌尿科(70.4%对59%)。与正在轮转的 M3 和 M4(临床)学生相比,更多的 M1 和 M2(临床前)学生正在考虑将泌尿外科作为一个专业(56.5% 对 28.6%;P=0.0064)。此外,与女生相比,考虑选择泌尿外科的男生比例更高(64.2% 对 42.7%;P=0.0164)。在考虑就读泌尿外科的学生(人数=75)中,57.3% 的学生对泌尿外科的范围缺乏了解,84% 的学生表示没有与泌尿科医生进行过临床前讨论。那些表示正在考虑泌尿外科的学生对早期接触的重视程度明显高于其他学生(98.7% 对 78.7%;P=0.0001)。他们还对开设泌尿外科核心课程表示出更大的兴趣(73.3% 对 38.7%;P=0.0001):结果表明,在临床前几年增加泌尿外科的接触非常重要。泌尿外科选修课和泌尿外科导师制在考虑就读泌尿外科的学生中兴趣很高。然而,要确定泌尿外科临床前课程的实施对泌尿外科匹配结果的影响,还需要进行更多的调查。
{"title":"Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Ryan Wong, Harvey N Mayrovitz","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is an increasing number of medical school graduates opting for surgical specialties, and the osteopathic applicant match rate for urology is lower than that of allopathic applicants. Factors influencing this may include a lack of interest, perceived challenges in matching into urology, insufficient urology mentorship, limited research opportunities, and inadequate osteopathic representation in urology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this survey is to assess osteopathic medical students' perspectives on pursuing urology and enhancing preclinical exposure to and knowledge of urology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 20-question survey addressing experiences and the factors influencing osteopathic medical students' specialty selection and their interest in and perception of urology was designed by the investigators on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. This survey was distributed via email listserv to all current osteopathic medical students attending Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine over 2 months. Responses were collected and analyzed utilizing Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 respondents, 91 % found mentors crucial in selecting a medical specialty, 95 % emphasized the importance of early exposure, and 68 % lacked familiarity with urology, with more M1 students unfamiliar with urology compared to M2 (70.4 % vs. 59 %). A larger proportion of combined M1 and M2 (preclinical) students are considering urology as a specialty compared to M3 and M4 (clinical) students who are actively on rotations (56.5 % vs. 28.6 %; p=0.0064). Also, a greater percentage of males are considering urology compared to females (64.2 % vs. 42.7 %; p=0.0164). Among those considering urology (n=75), 57.3 % lack awareness of urology's scope, and 84 % report no preclinical discussions with urologists. Those students who report that they are considering urology value early exposure significantly more than others (98.7 % vs. 78.7 %; p=0.0001). They also express greater interest in having a core urology course (73.3 % vs. 38.7 %; p<0.0001). More urology-considering students are interested in extracurricular urology-related workshops, seminars, or conferences (61.3 % vs. 17.3 %; p<0.0001). Students who are considering urology as a specialty show greater interest in having a mentorship program (85.3 % vs. 28 %; p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggested that increased urology exposure during the preclinical years is important. Urology elective offerings and urology mentorship are of high interest among those considering urology. However, additional investigation is needed to determine the impact of preclinical urology curricula implementation on urology match outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142509574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The negative effects of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and implications for the presurgical examination. 长 COVID-19 对心血管健康的负面影响及对手术前检查的影响。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0109
Hannah L Stimart, Brittany Hipkins
<p><strong>Context: </strong>In 2019, emergence of the novel and communicable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection took scientific communities by surprise and imposed significant burden on healthcare systems globally. Although the advent of this disease piqued the interest of academic centers, healthcare systems, and the general public, there is still much yet to be elucidated regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, and long-term impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been established that long COVID-19 can impact multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system, unfavorably. Although the pathophysiology of this damage is not well understood, adverse sequelae may range from chest pain and arrhythmias to heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death. For any postacute COVID-19 patient requiring a surgical procedure, the potential for cardiac injury secondary to long COVID-19 must be considered in the preoperative cardiac examination.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This literature review serves to add to the growing body of literature exploring postacute cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19, with a focus on presurgical cardiac clearance in the adult patient. Specifically, this review studies the prevalence of cardiovascular symptomatology including chest pain, arrhythmias, blood pressure changes, myo-/pericarditis, HF, cardiomyopathy, orthostatic intolerance, and thromboembolism. Although current evidence is scarce in both quality and quantity, it is the goal that this review will highlight the negative impacts of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and encourage providers to be cognizant of potential sequelae in the context of the presurgical examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, peer-reviewed and journal-published articles were selected based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria to address the question "How does long COVID-19 impact the presurgical cardiac examination of an adult scheduled to undergo a noncardiac procedure?" Inclusion criteria included human studies conducted in adult patients and published in peer-reviewed journals up until May 2024 examining the effects of long-COVID-19 infection on the cardiovascular system. Exclusion criteria eliminated unpublished reports, preprints, duplicate articles, literature regarding coronavirus strains other than COVID-19, studies regarding post-COVID-19 vaccination complications, animal studies, and studies conducted in people younger than 18 years of age. A total of 6,675 studies were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar. Following screening, 60 studies were included in final consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cardiovascular symptoms of postacute COVID-19 infection were encountered with the following percentages prevalence (total numbers of articles mentioning symptom/total number of articles [60]): chest pain (83.3), arrhythmias (88.3), hypertension (40.0), hyp
背景:2019 年,新型传染性严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的出现令科学界措手不及,并给全球医疗保健系统带来了沉重负担。尽管这种疾病的出现引起了学术中心、医疗保健系统和公众的兴趣,但关于冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的流行病学、病理生理学和长期影响,仍有许多问题有待阐明。已经证实,长期的 COVID-19 会对包括心血管系统在内的多个器官系统产生不利影响。虽然这种损害的病理生理学尚不十分清楚,但不良后遗症的范围可能从胸痛和心律失常到心力衰竭(HF)、心肌梗塞或心脏性猝死。对于任何需要进行外科手术的急性 COVID-19 后患者,在术前心脏检查中必须考虑长 COVID-19 继发心脏损伤的可能性:本文献综述旨在补充日益增多的探讨 COVID-19 急性期后心血管后果的文献,重点关注成年患者的术前心脏检查。具体而言,本综述研究了心血管症状的发生率,包括胸痛、心律失常、血压变化、心肌炎/心包炎、心房颤动、心肌病、正压性不耐受和血栓栓塞。虽然目前的证据在质量和数量上都很匮乏,但本综述旨在强调长期 COVID-19 对心血管健康的负面影响,并鼓励医疗服务提供者在术前检查时认识到潜在的后遗症:本研究根据既定的纳入和排除标准选择同行评审和期刊发表的文章,以解决 "长 COVID-19 对计划接受非心脏手术的成人的术前心脏检查有何影响?纳入标准包括截至 2024 年 5 月在同行评审期刊上发表的、针对成人患者进行的人类研究,这些研究探讨了长 COVID-19 感染对心血管系统的影响。排除标准包括未发表的报告、预印本、重复文章、有关 COVID-19 以外冠状病毒毒株的文献、有关接种 COVID-19 疫苗后并发症的研究、动物研究以及在 18 岁以下人群中开展的研究。从 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 共检索到 6675 项研究。经过筛选,60 项研究被纳入最终考虑范围:结果:急性 COVID-19 感染后出现的心血管症状的比例如下(提及症状的文章总数/文章总数 [60]):胸痛(83.3)、心律失常(88.3)、高血压(40.0)、低血压(16.7)、心肌炎(80.0)、心包炎(51.7)、HF(70.0)、心肌病(55.0)、正压性不耐受(56.7)和血栓栓塞事件(85.0):持续的 COVID 症状可能会对患者的体格检查、血液化验、心电图 (ECG)、影像学检查和/或超声心动图检查产生负面影响。由于心脏性猝死、心肌炎、中风和心肌梗死的风险增加,即使在急性 COVID-19 感染前身体健康的人也会出现此类风险,因此与长期 COVID 相关的心脏疾病需要手术前候选人特别注意。在获得更多具体的科学证据之前,应根据已采用的最佳实践对这些患者进行护理,临床医生应保持较低的门槛,在手术前进行更广泛的心脏检查。
{"title":"The negative effects of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and implications for the presurgical examination.","authors":"Hannah L Stimart, Brittany Hipkins","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0109","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Context: &lt;/strong&gt;In 2019, emergence of the novel and communicable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection took scientific communities by surprise and imposed significant burden on healthcare systems globally. Although the advent of this disease piqued the interest of academic centers, healthcare systems, and the general public, there is still much yet to be elucidated regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, and long-term impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been established that long COVID-19 can impact multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system, unfavorably. Although the pathophysiology of this damage is not well understood, adverse sequelae may range from chest pain and arrhythmias to heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death. For any postacute COVID-19 patient requiring a surgical procedure, the potential for cardiac injury secondary to long COVID-19 must be considered in the preoperative cardiac examination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;This literature review serves to add to the growing body of literature exploring postacute cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19, with a focus on presurgical cardiac clearance in the adult patient. Specifically, this review studies the prevalence of cardiovascular symptomatology including chest pain, arrhythmias, blood pressure changes, myo-/pericarditis, HF, cardiomyopathy, orthostatic intolerance, and thromboembolism. Although current evidence is scarce in both quality and quantity, it is the goal that this review will highlight the negative impacts of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and encourage providers to be cognizant of potential sequelae in the context of the presurgical examination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;For this study, peer-reviewed and journal-published articles were selected based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria to address the question \"How does long COVID-19 impact the presurgical cardiac examination of an adult scheduled to undergo a noncardiac procedure?\" Inclusion criteria included human studies conducted in adult patients and published in peer-reviewed journals up until May 2024 examining the effects of long-COVID-19 infection on the cardiovascular system. Exclusion criteria eliminated unpublished reports, preprints, duplicate articles, literature regarding coronavirus strains other than COVID-19, studies regarding post-COVID-19 vaccination complications, animal studies, and studies conducted in people younger than 18 years of age. A total of 6,675 studies were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar. Following screening, 60 studies were included in final consideration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Cardiovascular symptoms of postacute COVID-19 infection were encountered with the following percentages prevalence (total numbers of articles mentioning symptom/total number of articles [60]): chest pain (83.3), arrhythmias (88.3), hypertension (40.0), hyp","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142476659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reduction in deep organ-space infection in gynecologic oncology surgery with use of oral antibiotic bowel preparation: a retrospective cohort analysis. 使用口服抗生素肠道制剂减少妇科肿瘤手术中的深部器官间隙感染:一项回顾性队列分析。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0099
Kathryn Kennedy, Jennifer Gaertner-Otto, Eav Lim

Context: Deep organ-space infection (OSI) following gynecologic surgery is a source of patient morbidity and mortality. There is currently conflicting evidence regarding the use of bowel preparation prior to gynecologic surgery to reduce the rates of infection. For the additional purpose of improving patient recovery at our own institution, a retrospective cohort study compared the rate of deep OSI in patients who received oral antibiotic bowel preparation per Nichols-Condon bowel preparation with metronidazole and neomycin.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the rate of deep organ-space surgical site infection in gynecologic surgery before and after institution of an oral antibiotic bowel preparation, thus assessing whether the preparation is associated with decreased infection rate. The secondary objective was to identify other factors associated with deep organ-space site infection.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Demographic and surgical data were collected via chart review of 1,017 intra-abdominal surgeries performed by gynecologic oncologists at a single institution from April 1, 2019 to December 1, 2021. Of these, 778 met the inclusion criteria; 444 did not receive preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and 334 did receive preoperative bowel preparation. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and a logistic regression model was utilized for categorical variables. Multivariable regression analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 778 patients were included. Deep OSI rate in patients who did not receive oral antibiotic bowel preparation was 2.3 % compared to 0.3 % (OR 0.13, confidence interval [CI] 0.06-1.03, p=0.02) in patients who did. Receiving oral antibiotic bowel preparation predicted absence of deep OSI (OR 0.04, CI 0.00-0.87, p=0.04). Laparotomy (OR 20.1, CI 1.6-250.2, p=0.02) and Asian race (OR 60.8, CI 2.6-1,380.5, p=0.01) were related to increased rates of deep OSI.

Conclusions: Oral antibiotic bowel preparation predicts a reduced risk of deep OSI. This preparation is inexpensive and low-risk, and thus these clinically significant results support a promising regimen to improve surgical outcomes, and provide guidance for prospective larger studies.

背景:妇科手术后的深部器官间隙感染(OSI)是导致患者发病和死亡的原因之一。目前,关于在妇科手术前使用肠道准备以降低感染率的证据并不一致。为了改善患者的恢复情况,本机构还进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了接受口服抗生素肠道准备和使用甲硝唑和新霉素进行尼可康肠道准备的患者的深部 OSI 发生率:本研究的主要目的是比较妇科手术中口服抗生素肠道准备前后的深部器官间隙手术部位感染率,从而评估该准备是否与感染率降低有关。次要目标是确定与深部器官间隙部位感染相关的其他因素:进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 1 日,通过病历审查收集了由一家机构的妇科肿瘤专家实施的 1,017 例腹腔内手术的人口统计学和手术数据。其中,778例符合纳入标准;444例未接受术前口服抗生素肠道准备,334例接受了术前肠道准备。计算了比值比 (OR),并对分类变量采用了逻辑回归模型。进行了多变量回归分析:结果:共纳入 778 名患者。未接受口服抗生素肠道准备的患者的深度 OSI 率为 2.3%,而接受口服抗生素肠道准备的患者的深度 OSI 率为 0.3%(OR 0.13,置信区间 [CI]0.06-1.03,P=0.02)。接受口服抗生素肠道准备的患者不会出现深部 OSI(OR 0.04,CI 0.00-0.87,P=0.04)。开腹手术(OR 20.1,CI 1.6-250.2,P=0.02)和亚洲人种(OR 60.8,CI 2.6-1,380.5,P=0.01)与深部OSI发生率增加有关:结论:口服抗生素肠道制剂可降低深部 OSI 的风险。结论:口服抗生素肠道准备可降低深部 OSI 的风险。这种准备方法成本低、风险小,因此这些具有临床意义的结果支持了一种可改善手术预后的方案,并为更大规模的前瞻性研究提供了指导。
{"title":"Reduction in deep organ-space infection in gynecologic oncology surgery with use of oral antibiotic bowel preparation: a retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Kathryn Kennedy, Jennifer Gaertner-Otto, Eav Lim","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Deep organ-space infection (OSI) following gynecologic surgery is a source of patient morbidity and mortality. There is currently conflicting evidence regarding the use of bowel preparation prior to gynecologic surgery to reduce the rates of infection. For the additional purpose of improving patient recovery at our own institution, a retrospective cohort study compared the rate of deep OSI in patients who received oral antibiotic bowel preparation per Nichols-Condon bowel preparation with metronidazole and neomycin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the rate of deep organ-space surgical site infection in gynecologic surgery before and after institution of an oral antibiotic bowel preparation, thus assessing whether the preparation is associated with decreased infection rate. The secondary objective was to identify other factors associated with deep organ-space site infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed. Demographic and surgical data were collected via chart review of 1,017 intra-abdominal surgeries performed by gynecologic oncologists at a single institution from April 1, 2019 to December 1, 2021. Of these, 778 met the inclusion criteria; 444 did not receive preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and 334 did receive preoperative bowel preparation. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and a logistic regression model was utilized for categorical variables. Multivariable regression analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 778 patients were included. Deep OSI rate in patients who did not receive oral antibiotic bowel preparation was 2.3 % compared to 0.3 % (OR 0.13, confidence interval [CI] 0.06-1.03, p=0.02) in patients who did. Receiving oral antibiotic bowel preparation predicted absence of deep OSI (OR 0.04, CI 0.00-0.87, p=0.04). Laparotomy (OR 20.1, CI 1.6-250.2, p=0.02) and Asian race (OR 60.8, CI 2.6-1,380.5, p=0.01) were related to increased rates of deep OSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral antibiotic bowel preparation predicts a reduced risk of deep OSI. This preparation is inexpensive and low-risk, and thus these clinically significant results support a promising regimen to improve surgical outcomes, and provide guidance for prospective larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Communication and empathy within the patient-physician relationship among patients with and without chronic pain. 慢性疼痛患者和非慢性疼痛患者在医患关系中的沟通和共鸣。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0112
John C Licciardone, Claire N Middleton, Amin Aboutaj, Tal Allouche, Imran Siddiqui

Context: Chronic pain may affect the relationship between patients and their treating physicians.

Objectives: This study was designed to compare four aspects of physician communication and physician empathy reported by patients with chronic pain and in chronic pain-free controls.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted within a national pain research registry from July 2020 through January 2024. Patients with chronic low back pain of greater than 3 months duration were matched to chronic pain-free controls utilizing propensity scores derived from a logistic regression model based on 11 variables that included sociodemographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status, history of comorbid medical conditions, and duration of the current patient-physician relationship. Patients reported on the primary outcomes of physician communication utilizing the Communication Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) and physician empathy utilizing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Group means were compared for each aspect of physician communication (patient participation and patient orientation, effective and open communication, emotionally supportive communication, and communication about personal circumstances) and physician empathy, and Cohen's d statistic was utilized to assess the clinical relevance of between-group differences. Secondary exploratory analyses were also performed to compare patients treated by osteopathic physicians vs. allopathic physicians and to determine whether study group X physician type interaction effects were present.

Results: The 387 patients in each study group were matched within a caliper width of 0.001 on the propensity score. Overall, patients ranged from 21 to 79 years of age (mean, 50.7 years; standard deviation [SD], 15.1 years), and 617 (79.7 %) of them were female. Patients in the chronic pain group reported poorer scores for all aspects of physician communication and physician empathy than the chronic pain-free controls. All between-group differences were clinically relevant. There were no differences in physician communication or physician empathy according to physician type in the exploratory analyses, and study group X physician type interaction effects were not observed.

Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, patients with chronic pain reported having physicians with poorer communication and less empathy than chronic pain-free controls. Longitudinal research is needed to more clearly determine the temporal relationship between patients' chronic pain and physician communication and physician empathy during medical encounters.

背景:慢性疼痛可能会影响患者与主治医生之间的关系:本研究旨在比较慢性疼痛患者和慢性无痛对照组报告的医生沟通和医生移情的四个方面:从 2020 年 7 月到 2024 年 1 月,在国家疼痛研究登记处内开展了一项横断面研究。利用基于 11 个变量(包括社会人口特征、吸烟状况、合并症病史和当前医患关系持续时间)的逻辑回归模型得出的倾向分数,将病程超过 3 个月的慢性腰背痛患者与慢性无痛对照组进行配对。患者利用 "沟通行为问卷"(CBQ)报告了与医生沟通的主要结果,并利用 "咨询与关系移情"(CARE)测量方法报告了与医生移情的主要结果。比较了各组在医生沟通(患者参与和患者导向、有效和开放式沟通、情感支持性沟通和有关个人情况的沟通)和医生移情方面的平均值,并利用 Cohen'd 统计量评估了组间差异的临床相关性。此外,还进行了二次探索性分析,以比较接受整骨疗法医生与接受对抗疗法医生治疗的患者,并确定是否存在研究组与医生类型的交互效应:每个研究组的 387 名患者在倾向评分上的匹配度为 0.001。总体而言,患者年龄从 21 岁到 79 岁不等(平均 50.7 岁;标准差 [SD] 15.1 岁),其中 617 人(79.7%)为女性。与无慢性疼痛的对照组相比,慢性疼痛组患者在与医生沟通的各个方面以及医生的同理心方面的得分都较低。所有组间差异均与临床相关。在探索性分析中,不同医生类型在医生沟通和医生移情方面没有差异,也没有观察到研究组与医生类型之间的交互效应:在这项横断面研究中,与无慢性疼痛的对照组相比,慢性疼痛患者报告的医生沟通能力较差,移情能力较弱。需要进行纵向研究,以更清楚地确定患者的慢性疼痛与医生在就医过程中的沟通和同理心之间的时间关系。
{"title":"Communication and empathy within the patient-physician relationship among patients with and without chronic pain.","authors":"John C Licciardone, Claire N Middleton, Amin Aboutaj, Tal Allouche, Imran Siddiqui","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chronic pain may affect the relationship between patients and their treating physicians.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to compare four aspects of physician communication and physician empathy reported by patients with chronic pain and in chronic pain-free controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted within a national pain research registry from July 2020 through January 2024. Patients with chronic low back pain of greater than 3 months duration were matched to chronic pain-free controls utilizing propensity scores derived from a logistic regression model based on 11 variables that included sociodemographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status, history of comorbid medical conditions, and duration of the current patient-physician relationship. Patients reported on the primary outcomes of physician communication utilizing the Communication Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) and physician empathy utilizing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Group means were compared for each aspect of physician communication (patient participation and patient orientation, effective and open communication, emotionally supportive communication, and communication about personal circumstances) and physician empathy, and Cohen's d statistic was utilized to assess the clinical relevance of between-group differences. Secondary exploratory analyses were also performed to compare patients treated by osteopathic physicians vs. allopathic physicians and to determine whether study group X physician type interaction effects were present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 387 patients in each study group were matched within a caliper width of 0.001 on the propensity score. Overall, patients ranged from 21 to 79 years of age (mean, 50.7 years; standard deviation [SD], 15.1 years), and 617 (79.7 %) of them were female. Patients in the chronic pain group reported poorer scores for all aspects of physician communication and physician empathy than the chronic pain-free controls. All between-group differences were clinically relevant. There were no differences in physician communication or physician empathy according to physician type in the exploratory analyses, and study group X physician type interaction effects were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients with chronic pain reported having physicians with poorer communication and less empathy than chronic pain-free controls. Longitudinal research is needed to more clearly determine the temporal relationship between patients' chronic pain and physician communication and physician empathy during medical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modeling the importance of physician training in practice location for Ohio otolaryngologists. 为俄亥俄州耳鼻喉科医生的执业地点模拟医生培训的重要性。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0035
Samuel Borgemenke, D'Nair Newsom, Patrick Scheatzle, Nicholas Durstock, Elizabeth A Beverly

Context: Underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia face significant healthcare accessibility challenges, with the Midwest offering a lower density of healthcare providers compared to coastal regions. Specifically, underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia are disadvantaged in otolaryngology care.

Objectives: This analysis aims to identify factors that lead otolaryngologists to a respective practice location, and if any of that influence comes from where otolaryngologists completed their medical education.

Methods: The proportion of otolaryngologists who performed medical school, residency, and/or fellowship in Ohio was analyzed utilizing a three-sample test for equality. Multivariate logistic regression and Pearson prediction models were produced to analyze the impact of performing medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in Ohio.

Results: Going to medical school in Ohio significantly increases the odds of going to an otolaryngology residency in the state (p<0.001). Moreover, between medical school and residency, medical school was a significantly better predictor of otolaryngologists practicing in Appalachia (Δ Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC]>2) and southeast Ohio (ΔBIC>10). Medical school in state was also a better predictor of percent rural and median household income than residency (ΔBIC>10). The multivariate model of medical school and residency was significantly better than either predictor alone for the population (ΔBIC>2). All models predicting percent rural were significantly improved with the addition of a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) degree (ΔBIC>10).

Conclusions: Where physicians complete their medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in state has a significant impact on predicting their future place of practice. This study found that the location of such training has a positive predictive nature as to whether that physician will practice in a rural and underserved area in the future. Notably, the addition of being licensed as a DO also increased the probability of that physician practicing in a rural area.

背景:俄亥俄州东南部和阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足的社区面临着医疗服务可及性方面的巨大挑战,与沿海地区相比,中西部地区的医疗服务提供者密度较低。具体而言,俄亥俄州东南部和阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足的社区在耳鼻喉科医疗服务方面处于不利地位:本分析旨在确定导致耳鼻喉科医生选择各自执业地点的因素,以及这些因素是否来自耳鼻喉科医生完成医学教育的地点:方法: 通过三样本平等检验分析了在俄亥俄州完成医学院、住院医师培训和/或研究员培训的耳鼻喉科医生的比例。制作了多变量逻辑回归和皮尔逊预测模型,以分析在俄亥俄州接受医学培训(医学院、住院医师培训和研究员培训)的影响:结果:在俄亥俄州就读医学院会显著增加在该州(p2)和俄亥俄州东南部(ΔBIC>10)就读耳鼻喉科住院医师的几率。与住院医生相比,该州的医学院也能更好地预测农村人口比例和家庭收入中位数(ΔBIC>10)。医学院和住院医生的多变量模型对人口的预测效果明显优于单独的任何一个预测因子(ΔBIC>2)。所有预测农村人口比例的模型在加入整骨疗法博士(DO)学位后都有明显改善(ΔBIC>10):结论:医生在哪个州完成医学培训(医学院、住院医师培训和研究员培训)对预测他们未来的执业地点有重要影响。本研究发现,培训地点对医生未来是否会在农村和医疗服务不足的地区执业具有积极的预测作用。值得注意的是,获得执业医师执照也增加了医生在农村地区执业的可能性。
{"title":"Modeling the importance of physician training in practice location for Ohio otolaryngologists.","authors":"Samuel Borgemenke, D'Nair Newsom, Patrick Scheatzle, Nicholas Durstock, Elizabeth A Beverly","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia face significant healthcare accessibility challenges, with the Midwest offering a lower density of healthcare providers compared to coastal regions. Specifically, underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia are disadvantaged in otolaryngology care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis aims to identify factors that lead otolaryngologists to a respective practice location, and if any of that influence comes from where otolaryngologists completed their medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proportion of otolaryngologists who performed medical school, residency, and/or fellowship in Ohio was analyzed utilizing a three-sample test for equality. Multivariate logistic regression and Pearson prediction models were produced to analyze the impact of performing medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in Ohio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Going to medical school in Ohio significantly increases the odds of going to an otolaryngology residency in the state (p<0.001). Moreover, between medical school and residency, medical school was a significantly better predictor of otolaryngologists practicing in Appalachia (Δ Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC]>2) and southeast Ohio (ΔBIC>10). Medical school in state was also a better predictor of percent rural and median household income than residency (ΔBIC>10). The multivariate model of medical school and residency was significantly better than either predictor alone for the population (ΔBIC>2). All models predicting percent rural were significantly improved with the addition of a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) degree (ΔBIC>10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Where physicians complete their medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in state has a significant impact on predicting their future place of practice. This study found that the location of such training has a positive predictive nature as to whether that physician will practice in a rural and underserved area in the future. Notably, the addition of being licensed as a DO also increased the probability of that physician practicing in a rural area.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends of public interest in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) from 2004 to 2022. 2004 至 2022 年公众对慢性创伤性脑病 (CTE) 的关注趋势。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2024-0015
Blakelee Eggleston, Caitlin Wenske, Carly Sweat, Douglas Nolan, Nicholas B Sajjadi, Anna Mazur, Micah Hartwell

Context: Public interest in sport-related medical conditions is known to be affected by social media and pop cultural coverage. The purpose of this project was to assess the relationship between popular culture concerning chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and analyze of how often this topic was searched on the internet.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate deviations in public interest following player incidents of CTE and the effects that the media has had on public interest in CTE.

Methods: To determine our primary objective, we utilized Google Trends to extract the monthly relative search interest (RSI) in CTE between January 2002 and October 2022. To assess the increase in RSI following a major event, an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) to predict RSI from March 2012 was created through the end of the period, and calculated the differences between the actual and forecasted values.

Results: Data indicate that RSI increased over time, specifically following the release of the movie Concussion. The peak in RSI (100) over this timespan was following the release of Aaron Hernandez's autopsy results in 2017, which was 87.8 (95 % CI: 8.7-15.7) higher than forecasted, showing a 720.3 % increase in RSI. While research was published regarding CTE in 2005, the first major spike in search interest occurred after Junior Seau died in 2012. Increasing public interest in CTE continued when media exposure conveyed autopsies of former NFL players, the movie Concussion, and the release of The Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez. Given this increased interest in CTE, we recommend that media broadcasters become more educated on brain injuries, as well as the movement of Brain Injury Awareness Month and Concussion Awareness Day.

Conclusions: There has been an increase in public interest in CTE from 2004 through 2022 with surges following media releases of events involving NFL players. Therefore, physicians and media broadcasters must create partnerships to better educate the public about head injuries and the effects of CTE.

背景:众所周知,公众对体育相关疾病的兴趣会受到社交媒体和流行文化报道的影响。本项目旨在评估有关慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)的流行文化与分析该主题在互联网上的搜索频率之间的关系:本研究的目的是调查在 CTE 球员事件发生后公众兴趣的偏差,以及媒体对公众对 CTE 的兴趣所产生的影响:为了实现我们的首要目标,我们利用谷歌趋势提取了2002年1月至2022年10月期间CTE的月度相对搜索兴趣(RSI)。为了评估重大事件发生后 RSI 的增长情况,我们创建了一个自回归综合移动平均线(ARIMA)来预测 2012 年 3 月至该期间结束时的 RSI,并计算了实际值与预测值之间的差异:数据表明,RSI 随时间推移而增加,特别是在电影《脑震荡》上映之后。2017 年亚伦-埃尔南德斯(Aaron Hernandez)的尸检结果公布后,RSI(100)在这段时间内达到峰值,比预测值高出 87.8(95 % CI:8.7-15.7),显示 RSI 增加了 720.3%。虽然有关 CTE 的研究早在 2005 年就已发表,但搜索兴趣的首次大幅飙升发生在 2012 年小 Seau 去世之后。随着媒体对前 NFL 球员尸体解剖的曝光、电影《脑震荡》和《内心的杀手》的上映,公众对 CTE 的兴趣持续上升:亚伦-埃尔南德斯的心灵》上映后,公众对 CTE 的关注度持续上升。鉴于公众对 CTE 的兴趣日益浓厚,我们建议媒体广播人员加强对脑损伤的教育,并开展 "脑损伤宣传月 "和 "脑震荡宣传日 "活动:结论:从 2004 年到 2022 年,公众对 CTE 的关注度不断提高,在媒体发布 NFL 球员事件后,关注度激增。因此,医生和媒体广播公司必须建立合作关系,更好地向公众宣传头部损伤和 CTE 的影响。
{"title":"Trends of public interest in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) from 2004 to 2022.","authors":"Blakelee Eggleston, Caitlin Wenske, Carly Sweat, Douglas Nolan, Nicholas B Sajjadi, Anna Mazur, Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Public interest in sport-related medical conditions is known to be affected by social media and pop cultural coverage. The purpose of this project was to assess the relationship between popular culture concerning chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and analyze of how often this topic was searched on the internet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate deviations in public interest following player incidents of CTE and the effects that the media has had on public interest in CTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To determine our primary objective, we utilized Google Trends to extract the monthly relative search interest (RSI) in CTE between January 2002 and October 2022. To assess the increase in RSI following a major event, an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) to predict RSI from March 2012 was created through the end of the period, and calculated the differences between the actual and forecasted values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data indicate that RSI increased over time, specifically following the release of the movie <i>Concussion</i>. The peak in RSI (100) over this timespan was following the release of Aaron Hernandez's autopsy results in 2017, which was 87.8 (95 % CI: 8.7-15.7) higher than forecasted, showing a 720.3 % increase in RSI. While research was published regarding CTE in 2005, the first major spike in search interest occurred after Junior Seau died in 2012. Increasing public interest in CTE continued when media exposure conveyed autopsies of former NFL players, the movie <i>Concussion</i>, and the release of <i>The Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez</i>. Given this increased interest in CTE, we recommend that media broadcasters become more educated on brain injuries, as well as the movement of Brain Injury Awareness Month and Concussion Awareness Day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been an increase in public interest in CTE from 2004 through 2022 with surges following media releases of events involving NFL players. Therefore, physicians and media broadcasters must create partnerships to better educate the public about head injuries and the effects of CTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. 腰椎病的手法治疗加性建议与单纯手法治疗或运动疗法的比较:随机对照试验。
IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0075
Musa Sani Danazumi, Isa Abubakar Adamu, Musbahu Hamisu Usman, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai

Context: The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP.

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals.

Methods: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization.

Results: The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with "side-lying" being the most practiced sexual position and "standing" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While "lying supine" was the most practiced sexual position and "sitting on a chair" was the least practiced sexual position by males.

Conclusions: This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.

背景:采用生物心理社会疗法治疗腰背痛(LBP)有可能提高患者的治疗质量。然而,利用生物心理社会方法治疗腰背痛的试验在很大程度上忽视了性活动,而性活动是腰背痛患者的一个重要社会组成部分:本研究的目的是确定手法治疗加性建议(MT+SA)与单纯手法治疗(MT)或运动治疗(ET)相比,对腰椎间盘突出症伴根性神经病(DHR)患者的治疗效果,并确定这些患者的最佳性爱姿势:这是一项单盲随机对照试验。54名被诊断为慢性腰椎间盘突出症(超过3个月)的患者被随机分配到三组,MT+SA组、MT组和ET组各18人。MT+SA组的参与者接受徒手疗法(包括道林的神经肌肉结构渐进抑制疗法和穆里根的腿部运动脊柱动员疗法)和性建议,MT组的参与者只接受徒手疗法,ET组的参与者只接受运动疗法。每组接受治疗 12 周,然后再随访 40 周。主要结果是随机后12周的疼痛、活动受限、性功能障碍和运动恐惧症:结果:MT+SA 组在随机后 6、12、26 和 52 周的所有结果(神经功能除外)和所有时间(随机后 6、12、26 和 52 周)上的改善均明显优于 MT 或 ET 组。在随机治疗后 6 周和 12 周,这些改善对背痛、腿痛、药物摄入量和功能活动度也有临床意义;在随机治疗后 6 周、12 周、26 周和 52 周,这些改善对性功能障碍、活动受限、疼痛灾难化和运动恐惧症也有临床意义("侧卧 "是女性最常用的性姿势,"站立 "是女性最不常用的性姿势。而 "仰卧 "是男性采用最多的性姿势,"坐在椅子上 "是男性采用最少的性姿势:本研究发现,与单独接受 MT 或 ET 治疗相比,接受 MT+SA 治疗的 DHR 患者在所有结果上都有更好的改善。在长期随访中,这些改善在性功能障碍、活动受限、疼痛灾难化和运动恐惧症方面也具有临床意义。对于 DHR 患者来说,性定位也没有放之四海而皆准的方法。
{"title":"Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Musa Sani Danazumi, Isa Abubakar Adamu, Musbahu Hamisu Usman, Abdulsalam Mohammed Yakasai","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with \"<i>side-lying</i>\" being the most practiced sexual position and \"<i>standing</i>\" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While \"<i>lying supine</i>\" was the most practiced sexual position and \"<i>sitting on a chair</i>\" was the least practiced sexual position by males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1