Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for acute complicated diverticulitis: a comparative study of outcomes - a systematic review

L. D. R. Pinto, Gabriel A. P. Tapia, Laura D. S. Fierro, Thaís R. C. Urdiales, Jose A. N. Peña, Carla V. A. Manciati, N. P. C. Moscoso, Bolívar L. S. Pujos
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for acute complicated diverticulitis: a comparative study of outcomes - a systematic review","authors":"L. D. R. Pinto, Gabriel A. P. Tapia, Laura D. S. Fierro, Thaís R. C. Urdiales, Jose A. N. Peña, Carla V. A. Manciati, N. P. C. Moscoso, Bolívar L. S. Pujos","doi":"10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute complicated diverticulitis presents a more severe form of diverticular illness frequently needing urgent medical intervention and possibly surgical therapy. The aim of this review is to gather conclusive evidence from the literature comparing laparoscopic techniques to open and conservative ones in order to determine the most effective treatment plan for complicated diverticulitis. Online databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Elsevier and many others were systematically searched according to an inclusion criterion to obtain a total of 13 studies to be included in the review. 8/13 studies presented short term outcomes while 5/13 studies concluded with long term outcomes following index surgeries. Based on the end results, it can be concluded that laparoscopic surgery, in particular laparoscopic colon resection is superior to other techniques in treating complicated diverticulitis in terms of fewer short-term complications, low mortality rate better quality of life with few recurrence rates. However, other approaches have their own advantages and can be given priority based on the unique presentation of each case. The clinicians are advised to make informed decisions keeping in view all the patient and disease associated aspects.","PeriodicalId":14210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20240956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute complicated diverticulitis presents a more severe form of diverticular illness frequently needing urgent medical intervention and possibly surgical therapy. The aim of this review is to gather conclusive evidence from the literature comparing laparoscopic techniques to open and conservative ones in order to determine the most effective treatment plan for complicated diverticulitis. Online databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Elsevier and many others were systematically searched according to an inclusion criterion to obtain a total of 13 studies to be included in the review. 8/13 studies presented short term outcomes while 5/13 studies concluded with long term outcomes following index surgeries. Based on the end results, it can be concluded that laparoscopic surgery, in particular laparoscopic colon resection is superior to other techniques in treating complicated diverticulitis in terms of fewer short-term complications, low mortality rate better quality of life with few recurrence rates. However, other approaches have their own advantages and can be given priority based on the unique presentation of each case. The clinicians are advised to make informed decisions keeping in view all the patient and disease associated aspects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术治疗急性复杂性憩室炎:疗效比较研究--系统性综述
急性复杂性憩室炎是一种更为严重的憩室疾病,通常需要紧急医疗干预,甚至手术治疗。本综述旨在从文献中收集确凿证据,对腹腔镜技术和开腹保守技术进行比较,以确定治疗复杂性憩室炎最有效的方案。根据纳入标准系统地搜索了PubMed、Google Scholar、Cochrane、Elsevier等在线数据库,共有13项研究被纳入综述。其中 8/13 项研究介绍了短期疗效,5/13 项研究总结了指数手术后的长期疗效。根据最终结果,可以得出结论:腹腔镜手术,尤其是腹腔镜结肠切除术在治疗复杂性憩室炎方面优于其他技术,因为其短期并发症少、死亡率低、生活质量高且复发率低。不过,其他方法也有各自的优势,可根据每个病例的独特表现优先考虑。建议临床医生根据患者和疾病相关的所有方面做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of roxithromycin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections: a comprehensive overview Vacuum assisted closure as adjuvant therapy for a mangled upper extremity injury Disseminated annular granuloma: a rare dermatological manifestation of diabetes Establishing normal gallbladder volume: a comparative study of dual energy computed tomography and ultrasound measurements in a North Indian population A comparative study of chlorhexidine-coated tulle gras versus polyurethane adhesive film for donor site wound dressing in split skin graft cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1