Frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpression in ameloblastomas: a multi-institutional analysis of 86 cases in Latin America and comprehensive review of the literature.
F-M Silveira, L-F Schuch, V. Pereira-Prado, E. Sicco, O. Almeda-Ojeda, N. Molina-Frechero, M-L Paparella, M. Villarroel-Dorrego, M. Hernadez, R. Bologna-Molina
{"title":"Frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpression in ameloblastomas: a multi-institutional analysis of 86 cases in Latin America and comprehensive review of the literature.","authors":"F-M Silveira, L-F Schuch, V. Pereira-Prado, E. Sicco, O. Almeda-Ojeda, N. Molina-Frechero, M-L Paparella, M. Villarroel-Dorrego, M. Hernadez, R. Bologna-Molina","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe initiation of odontogenic tumorigenesis often involves the activation of the MAP-kinase pathway, with a pivotal role played by the BRAF V600E mutation. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpresion in ameloblastomas diagnosed in four Latin American centers and correlate this finding with the histological types and subtypes of the analyzed cases.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA total of 86 samples of ameloblastomas were examined for immunohistochemistry using anti-BRAF V600E antibody. The histopathological features of each case were analyzed.\n\n\nRESULTS\n Positivity for anti-BRAF V600E antibody was detected in 65/86 cases (75.6%). BRAF V600E was positive in 38/56 cases (67.9%) of conventional ameloblastomas and in 27/30 cases (90.0%) of unicystic ameloblastomas. A statistically significant difference in BRAF V600E positivity was observed when comparing unicystic ameloblastomas to conventional ameloblastomas (p=0.03). No statistically significant difference in BRAF V600E positivity was observed when comparing histological variants, both for conventional ameloblastomas and unicystic ameloblastomas.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study highlights a high frequency of BRAF V600E immunoreactivity in ameloblastomas among Latin American cases. The prevalence of the BRAF V600E immunoexpresion may suggest the feasibility of utilizing BRAF-targeted therapy for ameloblastomas with this mutation.","PeriodicalId":18351,"journal":{"name":"Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The initiation of odontogenic tumorigenesis often involves the activation of the MAP-kinase pathway, with a pivotal role played by the BRAF V600E mutation. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of BRAF V600E immunoexpresion in ameloblastomas diagnosed in four Latin American centers and correlate this finding with the histological types and subtypes of the analyzed cases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A total of 86 samples of ameloblastomas were examined for immunohistochemistry using anti-BRAF V600E antibody. The histopathological features of each case were analyzed.
RESULTS
Positivity for anti-BRAF V600E antibody was detected in 65/86 cases (75.6%). BRAF V600E was positive in 38/56 cases (67.9%) of conventional ameloblastomas and in 27/30 cases (90.0%) of unicystic ameloblastomas. A statistically significant difference in BRAF V600E positivity was observed when comparing unicystic ameloblastomas to conventional ameloblastomas (p=0.03). No statistically significant difference in BRAF V600E positivity was observed when comparing histological variants, both for conventional ameloblastomas and unicystic ameloblastomas.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights a high frequency of BRAF V600E immunoreactivity in ameloblastomas among Latin American cases. The prevalence of the BRAF V600E immunoexpresion may suggest the feasibility of utilizing BRAF-targeted therapy for ameloblastomas with this mutation.
期刊介绍:
1. Oral Medicine and Pathology:
Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of
diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as
orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on
the oral cavity.
2. Oral Surgery:
Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands,
maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management
of diseases affecting head and neck areas.
3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry:
Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with
a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients.
4. Implantology
5. Periodontology