Richter transformation acquiring PLCG2 mutation during Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.1002/jha2.891
Takafumi Tsushima, Nobue Sato, Yong-Mei Guo, Hirotaka Nakamura, Kodai Kunisada, Song-Gi Chi, Kenta Akie, Yuki Takahashi, Saki Nakamura, Kaoru Shimada, Genichiro Ishii, Yosuke Minami, Junichiro Yuda
{"title":"Richter transformation acquiring PLCG2 mutation during Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment","authors":"Takafumi Tsushima,&nbsp;Nobue Sato,&nbsp;Yong-Mei Guo,&nbsp;Hirotaka Nakamura,&nbsp;Kodai Kunisada,&nbsp;Song-Gi Chi,&nbsp;Kenta Akie,&nbsp;Yuki Takahashi,&nbsp;Saki Nakamura,&nbsp;Kaoru Shimada,&nbsp;Genichiro Ishii,&nbsp;Yosuke Minami,&nbsp;Junichiro Yuda","doi":"10.1002/jha2.891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The incidence of Richter transformation in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is up to 15% and Richter transformation is a frequent cause of treatment failure on ibrutinib (IBR) [<span>1</span>]. IBR has been promising in CLL cell growth suppression by inhibiting Bruton tyrosine kinase (<i>BTK</i>) [<span>2</span>]. However, resistance can occur due to specific mutations in <i>BTK</i> or <i>PLCG2</i> genes [<span>3</span>]. Another agent, venetoclax (VEN) has shown excellent efficacy in relapsed refractory CLL [<span>4</span>]. In Richter transformation, the effectiveness of VEN alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy has been demonstrated, although research in this area is limited and based on only a few cases [<span>5-7</span>]. <i>BTK</i>/<i>PLCG2</i> mutations play a role in IBR-resistant CLL progression. However, there is limited knowledge about <i>BTK</i> or <i>PLCG2</i> gene mutation statuses in Richter transformation.</p><p>A 72-year-old male was diagnosed with CLL characterized by a deletion in chromosome 17p [del(17p)] and a complex karyotype. After 12 months of diagnosis, he started IBR treatment. He initially showed a partial response. Two years after starting IBR, CLL cells in the peripheral blood increased, and he developed bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, along with elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed systemic lymphadenopathy. Bone marrow examination showed increased atypical lymphocytes, displaying a CD5+CD10-19+sIgκ+ phenotype, with del(17p) present in 27% of all nucleated cells, as confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The pathological examination of the cervical lymph nodes showed a diffuse proliferation of large lymphocytes that tested positive for CD5, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD45, and BCL-2 and negative for MUM-1 and BCL-6, with a Ki-67 index of ∼50%. A biopsy confirmed the transformation into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Figure 1). Genetic testing was conducted on lymph nodes and bone marrow samples collected simultaneously; <i>TP53</i> mutation (R283P) was found in lymph nodes [variant allele frequency (VAF): 0.85] and bone marrow specimens (VAF: 0.77). However, <i>PLCG2</i> mutation (D1144G) was only detected in the lymph node specimens (VAF: 0.07). In this case, a targeted gene panel was used in Japan. The sensitivity of allele mutation detection was 0.05. A single polymerase chain reaction was not performed. Additionally, we could not measure the <i>IGHV</i> mutation.</p><p>The patient's treatment involved VEN usage for gradually increasing doses up to 200 mg (with fluconazole concomitant use) as per guidelines, while the use of IBR gradually reduced (Figure 2). The patient's clinical symptoms (fever and others) and lymphadenopathy showed no signs of improvement with VEN initiation and IBR dose reduction. The laboratory values indicated a worsening trend, with elevated LDH and sIL-2R, reaching 511 U/L (normal; 124–222 IU/L) and 4,247 U/mL (normal; 122–496 U/mL), respectively. Initially, the plan was to taper off IBR, but due to worsening CLL lesions (especially the presence of leukemic cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow), IBR was continued at 420 mg/day in combination with 200 mg/day VEN. Subsequently, there was a marked improvement in the peripheral blood and lymph node lesions. This suggests that VEN is highly effective against Richter transformation, while IBR remains effective in treating existing CLL lesions in the bone marrow since no <i>PLCG2</i> mutations were found. Following VEN initiation, RIT was administered every 4 weeks for six doses, initiated 6 months after VEN treatment began. At the end of RIT, FDG-PET and bone marrow examination confirmed that the patient achieved complete remission, which was maintained at 24 months post-treatment follow-up. During the treatment course, neutropenia of CTCAE Grade1 was observed, and events such as febrile neutropenia and infection were not observed. Blood count has recovered to normal range at CR. At that time, peripheral blood flow cytometry-minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative.</p><p>This case represents a rare report of a <i>PLCG2</i> mutation specifically appearing only in the lymph nodes and not in the bone marrow during IBR treatment for CLL, leading to Richter transformation. The patient had complex karyotype and <i>TP53</i> abnormalities during the initial treatment, indicating a potential for a shorter duration of response compared to typical cases [<span>8</span>]. Despite approximately 2 years of disease control with IBR, the patient eventually progressed to Richter transformation, with an IBR-resistant <i>PLCG2</i> mutation detected in the lymph node lesions. CLL is known to exhibit genomic instability and clonal evolution, which can lead to the development of Richter transformation [<span>9</span>]. Richter transformation from CLL is associated with <i>TP53</i>, <i>NOTCH1</i> mutation, <i>CDKN2A</i> deletion, and <i>MYC</i> translocation [<span>10</span>]. Conventional cytotoxic anticancer treatments for Richter transformation have demonstrated unsatisfactory results, highlighting the need for new and innovative therapies [<span>11</span>]. In our patient, <i>PLCG2</i> mutations were detected only in the lymph node lesions, where more aggressive Richter transformation findings were observed, while no mutation was found in the bone marrow specimens; this aligns with the clinical course, which showed a transient increase in CLL cells in the peripheral blood after discontinuing IBR treatment. The three-drug combination therapy of IBR + VEN + RIT has effectively maintained a long-term complete remission in this patient. This case represents the first report of a patient with Richter transformation with differing <i>PLCG2</i> mutation statuses between the bone marrow and lymph nodes.</p><p>The combination of VEN and IBR has been documented to effectively reduce the resting and dividing subpopulations in most cases, making it a significant treatment approach for CLL [<span>12</span>]. In a particular study, high MRD-negative rates were achieved with the two-drug combination of IBR and VEN [<span>13</span>]. There are also reports of triple therapy with obinutuzumab, IBR, and VEN, which achieved negative MRD with high safety in high-risk CLL patients, suggesting earlier initiation of multidrug combination therapy is also promising [<span>14</span>]. In conclusion, this report highlights the effectiveness of VEN and RIT even in cases of Richter transformation with <i>PLCG2</i> mutations that have developed resistance to IBR. Furthermore, the results indicate that IBR remains significantly effective in treating existing residual CLL lesions in Richter transformation.</p><p>Takafumi Tsushima collected the data and wrote the manuscript. Junichiro Yuda and Takafumi Tsushima provided patient care. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board.</p><p>The author has confirmed patient consent statement is not needed for this submission.</p><p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.891","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of Richter transformation in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is up to 15% and Richter transformation is a frequent cause of treatment failure on ibrutinib (IBR) [1]. IBR has been promising in CLL cell growth suppression by inhibiting Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) [2]. However, resistance can occur due to specific mutations in BTK or PLCG2 genes [3]. Another agent, venetoclax (VEN) has shown excellent efficacy in relapsed refractory CLL [4]. In Richter transformation, the effectiveness of VEN alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy has been demonstrated, although research in this area is limited and based on only a few cases [5-7]. BTK/PLCG2 mutations play a role in IBR-resistant CLL progression. However, there is limited knowledge about BTK or PLCG2 gene mutation statuses in Richter transformation.

A 72-year-old male was diagnosed with CLL characterized by a deletion in chromosome 17p [del(17p)] and a complex karyotype. After 12 months of diagnosis, he started IBR treatment. He initially showed a partial response. Two years after starting IBR, CLL cells in the peripheral blood increased, and he developed bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, along with elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed systemic lymphadenopathy. Bone marrow examination showed increased atypical lymphocytes, displaying a CD5+CD10-19+sIgκ+ phenotype, with del(17p) present in 27% of all nucleated cells, as confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The pathological examination of the cervical lymph nodes showed a diffuse proliferation of large lymphocytes that tested positive for CD5, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD45, and BCL-2 and negative for MUM-1 and BCL-6, with a Ki-67 index of ∼50%. A biopsy confirmed the transformation into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Figure 1). Genetic testing was conducted on lymph nodes and bone marrow samples collected simultaneously; TP53 mutation (R283P) was found in lymph nodes [variant allele frequency (VAF): 0.85] and bone marrow specimens (VAF: 0.77). However, PLCG2 mutation (D1144G) was only detected in the lymph node specimens (VAF: 0.07). In this case, a targeted gene panel was used in Japan. The sensitivity of allele mutation detection was 0.05. A single polymerase chain reaction was not performed. Additionally, we could not measure the IGHV mutation.

The patient's treatment involved VEN usage for gradually increasing doses up to 200 mg (with fluconazole concomitant use) as per guidelines, while the use of IBR gradually reduced (Figure 2). The patient's clinical symptoms (fever and others) and lymphadenopathy showed no signs of improvement with VEN initiation and IBR dose reduction. The laboratory values indicated a worsening trend, with elevated LDH and sIL-2R, reaching 511 U/L (normal; 124–222 IU/L) and 4,247 U/mL (normal; 122–496 U/mL), respectively. Initially, the plan was to taper off IBR, but due to worsening CLL lesions (especially the presence of leukemic cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow), IBR was continued at 420 mg/day in combination with 200 mg/day VEN. Subsequently, there was a marked improvement in the peripheral blood and lymph node lesions. This suggests that VEN is highly effective against Richter transformation, while IBR remains effective in treating existing CLL lesions in the bone marrow since no PLCG2 mutations were found. Following VEN initiation, RIT was administered every 4 weeks for six doses, initiated 6 months after VEN treatment began. At the end of RIT, FDG-PET and bone marrow examination confirmed that the patient achieved complete remission, which was maintained at 24 months post-treatment follow-up. During the treatment course, neutropenia of CTCAE Grade1 was observed, and events such as febrile neutropenia and infection were not observed. Blood count has recovered to normal range at CR. At that time, peripheral blood flow cytometry-minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative.

This case represents a rare report of a PLCG2 mutation specifically appearing only in the lymph nodes and not in the bone marrow during IBR treatment for CLL, leading to Richter transformation. The patient had complex karyotype and TP53 abnormalities during the initial treatment, indicating a potential for a shorter duration of response compared to typical cases [8]. Despite approximately 2 years of disease control with IBR, the patient eventually progressed to Richter transformation, with an IBR-resistant PLCG2 mutation detected in the lymph node lesions. CLL is known to exhibit genomic instability and clonal evolution, which can lead to the development of Richter transformation [9]. Richter transformation from CLL is associated with TP53, NOTCH1 mutation, CDKN2A deletion, and MYC translocation [10]. Conventional cytotoxic anticancer treatments for Richter transformation have demonstrated unsatisfactory results, highlighting the need for new and innovative therapies [11]. In our patient, PLCG2 mutations were detected only in the lymph node lesions, where more aggressive Richter transformation findings were observed, while no mutation was found in the bone marrow specimens; this aligns with the clinical course, which showed a transient increase in CLL cells in the peripheral blood after discontinuing IBR treatment. The three-drug combination therapy of IBR + VEN + RIT has effectively maintained a long-term complete remission in this patient. This case represents the first report of a patient with Richter transformation with differing PLCG2 mutation statuses between the bone marrow and lymph nodes.

The combination of VEN and IBR has been documented to effectively reduce the resting and dividing subpopulations in most cases, making it a significant treatment approach for CLL [12]. In a particular study, high MRD-negative rates were achieved with the two-drug combination of IBR and VEN [13]. There are also reports of triple therapy with obinutuzumab, IBR, and VEN, which achieved negative MRD with high safety in high-risk CLL patients, suggesting earlier initiation of multidrug combination therapy is also promising [14]. In conclusion, this report highlights the effectiveness of VEN and RIT even in cases of Richter transformation with PLCG2 mutations that have developed resistance to IBR. Furthermore, the results indicate that IBR remains significantly effective in treating existing residual CLL lesions in Richter transformation.

Takafumi Tsushima collected the data and wrote the manuscript. Junichiro Yuda and Takafumi Tsushima provided patient care. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board.

The author has confirmed patient consent statement is not needed for this submission.

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗过程中发生 PLCG2 突变的里克特变异
在复发/难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中,Richter转化的发生率高达15%,而Richter转化是伊布替尼(IBR)治疗失败的一个常见原因[1]。伊布替尼通过抑制布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK),在抑制CLL细胞生长方面很有前景[2]。然而,BTK 或 PLCG2 基因的特定突变会导致耐药性的产生 [3]。另一种药物 Venetoclax(VEN)在复发难治性 CLL 中显示出卓越的疗效 [4]。在里氏转化中,VEN 单独使用或与常规化疗联合使用的疗效已得到证实,尽管这方面的研究还很有限,而且仅基于少数病例[5-7]。BTK/PLCG2突变在IBR耐药的CLL进展中起一定作用。一名 72 岁的男性被诊断患有以染色体 17p 缺失(del(17p))和复杂核型为特征的 CLL。确诊12个月后,他开始接受IBR治疗。他最初出现了部分反应。开始 IBR 治疗两年后,外周血中的 CLL 细胞增多,他出现了双侧颈部淋巴结肿大,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和可溶性白细胞介素-2 受体(sIL-2R)水平升高。荧光脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)显示出全身淋巴结病变。骨髓检查显示非典型淋巴细胞增多,呈CD5+CD10-19+sIgκ+表型,所有有核细胞中有27%存在del(17p),荧光原位杂交证实了这一点。宫颈淋巴结的病理检查显示大淋巴细胞弥漫性增生,CD5、CD19、CD20、CD22、CD23、CD45和BCL-2呈阳性,MUM-1和BCL-6呈阴性,Ki-67指数为50%。活检证实该淋巴瘤已转化为弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(图1)。对同时采集的淋巴结和骨髓标本进行了基因检测;在淋巴结[变异等位基因频率(VAF):0.85]和骨髓标本(VAF:0.77)中发现了TP53突变(R283P)。然而,仅在淋巴结标本中检测到 PLCG2 突变(D1144G)(变异等位基因频率:0.07)。在该病例中,日本使用了靶向基因面板。等位基因突变检测的灵敏度为 0.05。没有进行单聚合酶链反应。此外,我们无法检测到 IGHV 突变。患者的治疗包括根据指南逐步增加 VEN 的使用剂量至 200 毫克(同时使用氟康唑),同时逐步减少 IBR 的使用(图 2)。患者的临床症状(发热等)和淋巴结肿大在开始使用 VEN 和减少 IBR 剂量后没有改善迹象。实验室数值显示病情有恶化趋势,LDH 和 sIL-2R 升高,分别达到 511 U/L(正常值;124-222 IU/L)和 4,247 U/mL(正常值;122-496 U/mL)。最初的计划是逐渐停用 IBR,但由于 CLL 病变恶化(尤其是外周血和骨髓中出现白血病细胞),IBR 继续以 420 毫克/天的剂量与 200 毫克/天的 VEN 联用。随后,外周血和淋巴结病变有了明显改善。这表明,VEN 对里氏转化非常有效,而 IBR 对治疗骨髓中现有的 CLL 病变仍然有效,因为没有发现 PLCG2 突变。VEN 治疗开始 6 个月后,开始给予 RIT,每 4 周一次,共 6 次。在 RIT 治疗结束时,FDG-PET 和骨髓检查证实患者获得了完全缓解,并在治疗后 24 个月的随访中保持了完全缓解。在治疗过程中,观察到了 CTCAE 1 级中性粒细胞减少症,但未观察到发热性中性粒细胞减少症和感染等事件。在 CR 阶段,血细胞计数已恢复到正常范围。本病例是IBR治疗CLL期间,PLCG2突变仅特异性出现在淋巴结而非骨髓中,导致里氏转化的罕见报告。患者在初始治疗期间出现了复杂核型和 TP53 异常,这表明与典型病例相比,患者的反应持续时间可能更短[8]。尽管患者接受 IBR 治疗约 2 年,病情得到控制,但最终进展为里氏转化,淋巴结病变中检测到 IBR 耐药的 PLCG2 突变。众所周知,CLL 表现出基因组不稳定性和克隆进化,这可能导致里克特转化的发生 [9]。CLL的Richter转化与TP53、NOTCH1突变、CDKN2A缺失和MYC易位有关[10]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Optimisation of the Danish national haemoglobinopathy screening programme – A prospective intervention study A phase 1 trial of venetoclax in combination with liposomal vincristine in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell or T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from the ECOG‐ACRIN EA9152 protocol Unveiling the nephrotoxic profile of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world experience in Africa IDH2 mutation accelerates TPO-induced myelofibrosis with enhanced S100a8/a9 and NFκB signaling in vivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1