Woven endo bridge device for recurrent intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammad Amin Habibi, Farhang Rashidi, M. Fallahi, Mohammad Reza Arshadi, Saba Mehrtabar, Mohammad Reza Ahmadi, Milad Shafizadeh, Shahram Majidi
{"title":"Woven endo bridge device for recurrent intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Farhang Rashidi, M. Fallahi, Mohammad Reza Arshadi, Saba Mehrtabar, Mohammad Reza Ahmadi, Milad Shafizadeh, Shahram Majidi","doi":"10.1177/19714009241247457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nRecurrent intracranial aneurysms present a significant clinical challenge, demanding innovative and effective treatment approaches. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has emerged as a promising endovascular solution for managing these intricate cases. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the WEB device in treating recurrent intracranial aneurysms.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to June 5, 2023. Eligible studies focused on evaluating WEB device performance and included a minimum of five patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysms. The complete and adequate occlusion rates, neck remnant rates, and periprocedural complication rates were pooled using SATA V.17.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOur analysis included five studies collectively enrolling 73 participants. Participant ages ranged from 52.9 to 65 years, with 64.4% being female. Aneurysms were wide-necked and predominantly located in the middle cerebral artery, basilar artery, and anterior cerebral artery. Previous treatments encompassed coiling, clipping, and the use of WEB devices. Our study found an overall adequate occlusion rate of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89), a complete occlusion rate of 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.50), and a neck remnant rate of 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.48). Periprocedural complications were reported at a rate of 0%, although heterogeneity was observed in this data. Notably, evidence of publication bias was identified in the reporting of periprocedural complication rates.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur findings suggest that the WEB device is associated with favorable outcomes for treating recurrent wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.","PeriodicalId":371045,"journal":{"name":"The Neuroradiology Journal","volume":"52 4","pages":"19714009241247457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241247457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recurrent intracranial aneurysms present a significant clinical challenge, demanding innovative and effective treatment approaches. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has emerged as a promising endovascular solution for managing these intricate cases. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the WEB device in treating recurrent intracranial aneurysms. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to June 5, 2023. Eligible studies focused on evaluating WEB device performance and included a minimum of five patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysms. The complete and adequate occlusion rates, neck remnant rates, and periprocedural complication rates were pooled using SATA V.17. RESULTS Our analysis included five studies collectively enrolling 73 participants. Participant ages ranged from 52.9 to 65 years, with 64.4% being female. Aneurysms were wide-necked and predominantly located in the middle cerebral artery, basilar artery, and anterior cerebral artery. Previous treatments encompassed coiling, clipping, and the use of WEB devices. Our study found an overall adequate occlusion rate of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89), a complete occlusion rate of 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.50), and a neck remnant rate of 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.48). Periprocedural complications were reported at a rate of 0%, although heterogeneity was observed in this data. Notably, evidence of publication bias was identified in the reporting of periprocedural complication rates. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the WEB device is associated with favorable outcomes for treating recurrent wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗复发性颅内动脉瘤的编织内桥装置:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景复发性颅内动脉瘤是一项重大的临床挑战,需要创新和有效的治疗方法。Woven EndoBridge(WEB)装置已成为治疗这些复杂病例的一种很有前景的血管内解决方案。本研究旨在评估 WEB 设备治疗复发性颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。方法我们对多个数据库进行了全面检索,包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 6 月 5 日。符合条件的研究侧重于评估 WEB 设备的性能,并至少纳入五名复发性颅内动脉瘤患者。我们使用 SATA V.17 对完全和充分闭塞率、颈部残余率以及围手术期并发症率进行了汇总。参与者的年龄从 52.9 岁到 65 岁不等,其中 64.4% 为女性。动脉瘤为宽颈动脉瘤,主要位于大脑中动脉、基底动脉和大脑前动脉。以往的治疗方法包括卷曲、剪切和使用 WEB 设备。我们的研究发现,总体充分闭塞率为 0.80(95% CI 0.71-0.89),完全闭塞率为 0.39(95% CI 0.28-0.50),颈部残余率为 0.38(95% CI 0.27-0.48)。据报道,围手术期并发症的发生率为 0%,但该数据存在异质性。结论我们的研究结果表明,WEB 装置在治疗复发性颅内宽颈动脉瘤方面具有良好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetic ketoacidosis with central nervous system involvement: Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings. Arachnoid cyst in the pediatric patient: What the radiologist needs to know. Ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. Stent plus balloon-assisted coiling with low-profile braided stents in the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1