Fourier Analysis of the Vertical Ground Reaction Force During Walking: Applications for Quantifying Differences in Gait Strategies.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1123/jab.2023-0151
Taylor P. Trentadue, Daniel Schmitt
{"title":"Fourier Analysis of the Vertical Ground Reaction Force During Walking: Applications for Quantifying Differences in Gait Strategies.","authors":"Taylor P. Trentadue, Daniel Schmitt","doi":"10.1123/jab.2023-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time series biomechanical data inform our understanding of normal gait mechanics and pathomechanics. This study examines the utility of different quantitative methods to distinguish vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) from experimentally distinct gait strategies. The goals of this study are to compare measures of VGRF data-using the shape factor method and a Fourier series-based analysis-to (1) describe how these methods reflect and distinguish gait patterns and (2) determine which Fourier series coefficients discriminate normal walking, with a relatively stiff-legged gait, from compliant walking, using deep knee flexion and limited vertical oscillation. This study includes a reanalysis of previously presented VGRF data. We applied the shape factor method and fit 3- to 8-term Fourier series to zero-padded VGRF data. We compared VGRF renderings using Euclidean L2 distances and correlations stratified by gait strategy. Euclidean L2 distances improved with additional harmonics, with limited improvement after the seventh term. Euclidean L2 distances were greater in shape factor versus Fourier series renderings. In the 8 harmonic model, amplitudes of 9 Fourier coefficients-which contribute to VGRF features including peak and local minimum amplitudes and limb loading rates-were different between normal and compliant walking. The results suggest that Fourier series-based methods distinguish between gait strategies.","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time series biomechanical data inform our understanding of normal gait mechanics and pathomechanics. This study examines the utility of different quantitative methods to distinguish vertical ground reaction forces (VGRFs) from experimentally distinct gait strategies. The goals of this study are to compare measures of VGRF data-using the shape factor method and a Fourier series-based analysis-to (1) describe how these methods reflect and distinguish gait patterns and (2) determine which Fourier series coefficients discriminate normal walking, with a relatively stiff-legged gait, from compliant walking, using deep knee flexion and limited vertical oscillation. This study includes a reanalysis of previously presented VGRF data. We applied the shape factor method and fit 3- to 8-term Fourier series to zero-padded VGRF data. We compared VGRF renderings using Euclidean L2 distances and correlations stratified by gait strategy. Euclidean L2 distances improved with additional harmonics, with limited improvement after the seventh term. Euclidean L2 distances were greater in shape factor versus Fourier series renderings. In the 8 harmonic model, amplitudes of 9 Fourier coefficients-which contribute to VGRF features including peak and local minimum amplitudes and limb loading rates-were different between normal and compliant walking. The results suggest that Fourier series-based methods distinguish between gait strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步行时垂直地面反作用力的傅立叶分析:量化步态策略差异的应用
时间序列生物力学数据有助于我们了解正常步态力学和病理力学。本研究探讨了不同定量方法在区分实验中不同步态策略的垂直地面反作用力(VGRF)方面的实用性。本研究的目标是比较 VGRF 数据的测量方法--使用形状因子法和基于傅立叶序列的分析--(1)描述这些方法如何反映和区分步态模式;(2)确定哪些傅立叶序列系数可以区分正常行走(相对僵硬的腿部步态)和顺应性行走(使用膝关节深屈和有限的垂直摆动)。本研究包括对之前提交的 VGRF 数据的重新分析。我们采用了形状因子法,并对零填充的 VGRF 数据拟合了 3 至 8 期傅里叶序列。我们使用欧氏 L2 距离和按步态策略分层的相关性对 VGRF 呈现进行了比较。随着谐波次数的增加,欧氏 L2 距离也有所改善,但在第七项之后改善有限。形状因子与傅里叶序列呈现的欧氏 L2 距离更大。在 8 次谐波模型中,9 个傅立叶系数的振幅在正常行走和顺应性行走之间存在差异,而这些系数对 VGRF 特征(包括峰值和局部最小振幅以及肢体负荷率)做出了贡献。结果表明,基于傅立叶序列的方法可以区分不同的步态策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
期刊最新文献
Do Experienced Adolescent Competition Dancers Alter Landing Kinematics and Kinetics for Split Leaps or Center Leaps After Fatigue? Effects of Stroboscopic Goggles on Standing Balance in the Spatiotemporal and Frequency Domains: An Exploratory Study. Relationship Between Supporting Leg Stiffness and Trunk Kinematics of the Kicking Leg During Soccer Kicking. The Effects of Running Foot Strike Manipulation on Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity in Healthy Nulliparous Females. Fatigue-Related Changes in Running Technique and Mechanical Variables After a Maximal Incremental Test in Recreational Runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1