EGFR/CEP7 high polysomy is separate and distinct from EGFR amplification in glioblastoma as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1093/jnen/nlae028
Diane M. Wilcock, Eric Goold, Lauren M Zuromski, Christian Davidson, Qinwen Mao, Deepika Sirohi
{"title":"EGFR/CEP7 high polysomy is separate and distinct from EGFR amplification in glioblastoma as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization","authors":"Diane M. Wilcock, Eric Goold, Lauren M Zuromski, Christian Davidson, Qinwen Mao, Deepika Sirohi","doi":"10.1093/jnen/nlae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract EGFR amplification in gliomas is commonly defined by an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of ≥2. In testing performed at a major reference laboratory, a small subset of patients had ≥5 copies of both EGFR and CEP7 yet were not amplified by the EGFR/CEP7 ratio and were designated high polysomy cases. To determine whether these tumors are more closely related to traditionally defined EGFR-amplified or nonamplified gliomas, a retrospective search identified 22 out of 1143 (1.9%) gliomas with an average of ≥5 copies/cell of EGFR and CEP7 with an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of <2 displaying high polysomy. Of these cases, 4 had insufficient clinicopathologic data to include in additional analysis, 15 were glioblastomas, 2 were IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 1 was a high-grade glial neoplasm, NOS. Next-generation sequencing available on 3 cases demonstrated one with a TERT promoter mutation, TP53 mutations in all cases, and no EGFR mutations or amplifications, which most closely matched the nonamplified cases. The median overall survival times were 42.86, 66.07, and 41.14 weeks for amplified, highly polysomic, and nonamplified, respectively, and were not significantly different (p =  0.3410). High chromosome 7 polysomic gliomas are rare but our data suggest that they may be biologically similar to nonamplified gliomas.","PeriodicalId":16682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlae028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract EGFR amplification in gliomas is commonly defined by an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of ≥2. In testing performed at a major reference laboratory, a small subset of patients had ≥5 copies of both EGFR and CEP7 yet were not amplified by the EGFR/CEP7 ratio and were designated high polysomy cases. To determine whether these tumors are more closely related to traditionally defined EGFR-amplified or nonamplified gliomas, a retrospective search identified 22 out of 1143 (1.9%) gliomas with an average of ≥5 copies/cell of EGFR and CEP7 with an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of <2 displaying high polysomy. Of these cases, 4 had insufficient clinicopathologic data to include in additional analysis, 15 were glioblastomas, 2 were IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 1 was a high-grade glial neoplasm, NOS. Next-generation sequencing available on 3 cases demonstrated one with a TERT promoter mutation, TP53 mutations in all cases, and no EGFR mutations or amplifications, which most closely matched the nonamplified cases. The median overall survival times were 42.86, 66.07, and 41.14 weeks for amplified, highly polysomic, and nonamplified, respectively, and were not significantly different (p =  0.3410). High chromosome 7 polysomic gliomas are rare but our data suggest that they may be biologically similar to nonamplified gliomas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荧光原位杂交法测定胶质母细胞瘤中表皮生长因子受体/表皮生长因子受体 CEP7 基因高度多倍性与表皮生长因子受体扩增是独立和不同的
摘要 脑胶质瘤中表皮生长因子受体扩增通常由表皮生长因子受体/CEP7比值≥2来定义。在一家主要参考实验室进行的检测中,一小部分患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和表皮生长因子受体(CEP7)的拷贝数均≥5,但未按EGFR/CEP7比值扩增,因此被称为高多聚体病例。为了确定这些肿瘤是否与传统定义的表皮生长因子受体扩增或非扩增胶质瘤有更密切的关系,一项回顾性检索在1143例胶质瘤中发现了22例(1.9%)表皮生长因子受体和CEP7的平均拷贝数≥5个/细胞,且表皮生长因子受体/CEP7比值<2的胶质瘤显示为高倍体。在这些病例中,4例临床病理数据不足,无法进行额外分析,15例为胶质母细胞瘤,2例为IDH突变星形细胞瘤,1例为高级别胶质肿瘤(NOS)。3例病例的下一代测序结果显示,其中1例存在TERT启动子突变,所有病例均存在TP53突变,无表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变或扩增,与无扩增病例最为接近。扩增、高度多组和非扩增病例的中位总生存时间分别为42.86周、66.07周和41.14周,无显著差异(P = 0.3410)。高7号染色体多体胶质瘤非常罕见,但我们的数据表明,它们在生物学上可能与非扩增胶质瘤相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology is the official journal of the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. (AANP). The journal publishes peer-reviewed studies on neuropathology and experimental neuroscience, book reviews, letters, and Association news, covering a broad spectrum of fields in basic neuroscience with an emphasis on human neurological diseases. It is written by and for neuropathologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, pathologists, psychiatrists, and basic neuroscientists from around the world. Publication has been continuous since 1942.
期刊最新文献
FH-mutant glioma displaying the epigenetic signature of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Polymicrobial brain abscesses: A complex condition with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Cytoplasmic aggregation of TDP43 and topographic correlation with tau and α-synuclein accumulation in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. Primary CNS histiocytic sarcoma: Two case reports highlighting a novel MIGA2::BRAF gene fusion and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling results. Revealing the potential role of hsa-miR-663a in modulating the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway via miRNA microarray in spinal muscular atrophy patient fibroblast-derived iPSCs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1