Ethical Considerations in AI-driven Dynamic Pricing in the USA: Balancing Profit Maximization with Consumer Fairness and Transparency

Md Sumon Gazi, N. Gurung, Anik Mitra, Md Rokibul Hasan
{"title":"Ethical Considerations in AI-driven Dynamic Pricing in the USA: Balancing Profit Maximization with Consumer Fairness and Transparency","authors":"Md Sumon Gazi, N. Gurung, Anik Mitra, Md Rokibul Hasan","doi":"10.32996/jefas.2024.6.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations in the USA are progressively employing AI-driven dynamic pricing as a strategic intervention to flexibly modify their prices based on competition, market demand, and various other factors. This research paper focused on the ethical dimensions of AI-driven dynamic pricing and the crucial interplay between profitability and the establishment of unwavering consumer transparency and fairness. The recommended models for dynamic pricing solutions entailed ensemble learning methods, notably, XG-Boost, Light-GBM, Cat-Boost, and X-NGBoost models. Particularly, the proposed model consolidated the XG-Boost algorithm and the NG-Boost model, resulting in a novel methodology termed the X-NGBoost. To compare and contrast the performance of the proposed models, these algorithms were trained and subjected to the same dataset. The comparison between the models was mainly grounded on the root-mean-square error (RMSE) metric, which was quantified in meters. The results indicated that X-NGBoost had the lowest RMSE on both the testing and training sets, at 4.23 and 5.34 respectively. This indicated that X-NGBoost performed very well on both seen and unseen data. Therefore, from the outcomes it was deduced that, for the provided data set, the X-NGBoost model provided the accurate pricing solution.","PeriodicalId":508227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies","volume":"97 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2024.6.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations in the USA are progressively employing AI-driven dynamic pricing as a strategic intervention to flexibly modify their prices based on competition, market demand, and various other factors. This research paper focused on the ethical dimensions of AI-driven dynamic pricing and the crucial interplay between profitability and the establishment of unwavering consumer transparency and fairness. The recommended models for dynamic pricing solutions entailed ensemble learning methods, notably, XG-Boost, Light-GBM, Cat-Boost, and X-NGBoost models. Particularly, the proposed model consolidated the XG-Boost algorithm and the NG-Boost model, resulting in a novel methodology termed the X-NGBoost. To compare and contrast the performance of the proposed models, these algorithms were trained and subjected to the same dataset. The comparison between the models was mainly grounded on the root-mean-square error (RMSE) metric, which was quantified in meters. The results indicated that X-NGBoost had the lowest RMSE on both the testing and training sets, at 4.23 and 5.34 respectively. This indicated that X-NGBoost performed very well on both seen and unseen data. Therefore, from the outcomes it was deduced that, for the provided data set, the X-NGBoost model provided the accurate pricing solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国人工智能动态定价的道德考量:在利润最大化与消费者公平性和透明度之间取得平衡
美国的企业正逐步采用人工智能驱动的动态定价作为一种战略干预手段,根据竞争、市场需求和其他各种因素灵活调整价格。本研究论文的重点是人工智能驱动的动态定价的道德层面,以及盈利能力与建立坚定的消费者透明度和公平性之间的重要相互作用。推荐的动态定价解决方案模型包含集合学习方法,特别是 XG-Boost、Light-GBM、Cat-Boost 和 X-NGBoost 模型。特别是,所提出的模型综合了 XG-Boost 算法和 NG-Boost 模型,形成了一种称为 X-NGBoost 的新方法。为了比较和对比所提模型的性能,对这些算法进行了训练,并对相同的数据集进行了测试。模型之间的比较主要基于均方根误差(RMSE)指标,该指标以米为单位进行量化。结果表明,X-NGBoost 在测试集和训练集上的 RMSE 最低,分别为 4.23 和 5.34。这表明,X-NGBoost 在可见和未知数据上的表现都非常出色。因此,从结果中可以推断出,对于所提供的数据集,X-NGBoost 模型提供了准确的定价解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Empowered Insights into Rental Market Behavior The Impact of Money Supply, Interest Rate and Inflation Rate on Economic Growth: A Case of Morocco Ethical Considerations in AI-driven Dynamic Pricing in the USA: Balancing Profit Maximization with Consumer Fairness and Transparency High-end Customers Loyalty among Selected Public and Private Banks in Yantai City, Shandong Province, China: A Service Marketing Guide for Financial Institutions Comparison of the Effects of Financial Literacy on the Financial Behavior of Civil Servants and Private Employees at Millennial Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1