Abstracts from the International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS) annual scientific meeting on pelvic pain 2022

IF 4.7 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001130
Grigol Bardin, M. B. Morin
{"title":"Abstracts from the International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS) annual scientific meeting on pelvic pain 2022","authors":"Grigol Bardin, M. B. Morin","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System—Gynecology section Introduction: The intrauterine device (IUD) is an efficacious, long-acting, reversible contraceptive method that can be used to treat dysmenorrhea and heavy menses. Studies have shown that women experience moderate levels of pain at the time of IUD insertion and that they may decline IUD insertion due to fears of pain. Previous investigations regarding the efficacy of oral analgesics for IUD insertion pain have conflicting results. We hypothesize that a multidose ibuprofen regimen given 24-hours before the insertion of IUD can provide pain relief. Methods: This is a prospective, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study that assesses pain levels with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) during speculum insertion, tenaculum insertion, IUD insertion, and 24 hours after insertion. Pain methods used 24 hours after insertion were also assessed. We performed an interval analysis of 27 patients who have completed the trial, without breaking the randomization sequence as enrollment is still ongoing. Results: There is a significant difference in IUD insertion pain scores between multidose ibuprofen group and a placebo group (Group A mean 6.8, SD 1.7, Group B mean 4.3, SD 2.9, P 5 0.01). There was no difference in pain scores at any other time point. Despite a higher pain score at the time of insertion, more women in Group A than in Group B used no pain medications after insertion ( P 5 0.03). Conclusions: There is a difference in pain scores at the time of IUD insertion; however, due to ongoing randomization, we do not know whether it is less in women who took ibuprofen or placebo. Disclosure: Any of the authors","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

System—Gynecology section Introduction: The intrauterine device (IUD) is an efficacious, long-acting, reversible contraceptive method that can be used to treat dysmenorrhea and heavy menses. Studies have shown that women experience moderate levels of pain at the time of IUD insertion and that they may decline IUD insertion due to fears of pain. Previous investigations regarding the efficacy of oral analgesics for IUD insertion pain have conflicting results. We hypothesize that a multidose ibuprofen regimen given 24-hours before the insertion of IUD can provide pain relief. Methods: This is a prospective, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study that assesses pain levels with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) during speculum insertion, tenaculum insertion, IUD insertion, and 24 hours after insertion. Pain methods used 24 hours after insertion were also assessed. We performed an interval analysis of 27 patients who have completed the trial, without breaking the randomization sequence as enrollment is still ongoing. Results: There is a significant difference in IUD insertion pain scores between multidose ibuprofen group and a placebo group (Group A mean 6.8, SD 1.7, Group B mean 4.3, SD 2.9, P 5 0.01). There was no difference in pain scores at any other time point. Despite a higher pain score at the time of insertion, more women in Group A than in Group B used no pain medications after insertion ( P 5 0.03). Conclusions: There is a difference in pain scores at the time of IUD insertion; however, due to ongoing randomization, we do not know whether it is less in women who took ibuprofen or placebo. Disclosure: Any of the authors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际骨盆疼痛学会(IPPS)2022 年骨盆疼痛年度科学会议摘要
系统-妇科部分 简介:宫内节育器(IUD)是一种有效、长效、可逆的避孕方法,可用于治疗痛经和月经过多。研究表明,妇女在放置宫内节育器时会感到中等程度的疼痛,她们可能会因为害怕疼痛而拒绝放置宫内节育器。以往关于口服镇痛药对宫内节育器放置疼痛疗效的研究结果相互矛盾。我们假设在放置宫内节育器前 24 小时服用多剂量布洛芬可缓解疼痛。方法:这是一项前瞻性三盲安慰剂对照研究,采用 10 点视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估窥阴器插入、韧带插入、宫内节育器插入和插入后 24 小时的疼痛程度。此外,还对插入后 24 小时内使用的止痛方法进行了评估。我们对已完成试验的 27 名患者进行了间隔分析,由于仍在进行注册,因此没有中断随机序列。结果多剂量布洛芬组和安慰剂组的宫内节育器插入疼痛评分有明显差异(A 组平均 6.8,SD 1.7;B 组平均 4.3,SD 2.9,P 5 0.01)。其他时间点的疼痛评分没有差异。尽管插入时的疼痛评分较高,但插入后未使用止痛药物的 A 组女性多于 B 组(P 5 0.03)。结论:放置宫内节育器时的疼痛评分存在差异;然而,由于随机化仍在进行,我们还不清楚服用布洛芬或安慰剂的妇女的疼痛评分是否更低。信息披露:任何作者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Marking the 100th Issue of ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pushing down the Limit of Ammonia Detection of ZnO-Based Chemiresistive Sensors with Exposed Hexagonal Facets at Room Temperature Direct-Printed Mn–Ni–Cu–O/Poly(vinyl butyral) Composites for Sintering-Free, Flexible Thermistors with High Sensitivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1