Reactions to vaping cessation messaging and strategies among US young adults who use e-cigarettes

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.18332/tpc/186271
Katelyn F. Romm, Daisy Le, L. Abroms, Carla J. Berg
{"title":"Reactions to vaping cessation messaging and strategies among US young adults who use e-cigarettes","authors":"Katelyn F. Romm, Daisy Le, L. Abroms, Carla J. Berg","doi":"10.18332/tpc/186271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Despite high rates of young adult e-cigarette use, research informing cessation interventions for this population, including those unready to quit, is limited. METHODS We analyzed 2022 cross-sectional survey data (from a larger longitudinal study) among 172 US young adult, past-month e-cigarette users (mean age=26.95 years; 57.6% female; 73.3% White). We examined: 1) perceived challenges to quitting e-cigarettes; 2) perceived impact of intervention messages targeting motivation and confidence, and their associations with quitting importance and confidence; and 3) poly-use with cigarettes and/or cannabis in relation to poly-product cessation preferences. RESULTS In all, 43.6% reported past-year e-cigarette quit attempts, and 55.3% reported quit readiness; 30.2% reported past-month poly-use with cigarettes, and 54.1% with cannabis. Frequently endorsed challenges to quitting/cutting down were related to stress/anxiety (41.9%), delaying cessation attempts (35.5%), and boredom (25.6%). Messages targeting motivation perceived as most impactful (scale: 1 = ‘no impact at all’ to 7 = ‘a lot of impact’) were related to saving money (mean score=4.78), improving health (mean score=4.15), and avoiding toxic chemicals (mean score=4.04), messages targeting confidence perceived as most impactful were related to patience (mean score=4.47), staying busy (mean score=4.27), and soliciting support (mean score=3.84). Perceiving greater impact of messages targeting motivation was associated with greater quitting importance (B=1.16; 95% CI: 0.71–1.60, p<0.001). Neither perceived impact of messages targeting motivation nor confidence were related to quitting confidence. E-cigarette–cannabis poly-users preferred to quit cigarettes first, e-cigarette–cigarette users preferred to quit cannabis first, and poly-users of all three products preferred to quit e-cigarettes first, followed by cigarettes, then cannabis. CONCLUSIONS E-cigarette cessation interventions must use relevant messages (e.g. target financial and health benefits of quitting) and consider poly-users’ preferences for quitting.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/186271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Despite high rates of young adult e-cigarette use, research informing cessation interventions for this population, including those unready to quit, is limited. METHODS We analyzed 2022 cross-sectional survey data (from a larger longitudinal study) among 172 US young adult, past-month e-cigarette users (mean age=26.95 years; 57.6% female; 73.3% White). We examined: 1) perceived challenges to quitting e-cigarettes; 2) perceived impact of intervention messages targeting motivation and confidence, and their associations with quitting importance and confidence; and 3) poly-use with cigarettes and/or cannabis in relation to poly-product cessation preferences. RESULTS In all, 43.6% reported past-year e-cigarette quit attempts, and 55.3% reported quit readiness; 30.2% reported past-month poly-use with cigarettes, and 54.1% with cannabis. Frequently endorsed challenges to quitting/cutting down were related to stress/anxiety (41.9%), delaying cessation attempts (35.5%), and boredom (25.6%). Messages targeting motivation perceived as most impactful (scale: 1 = ‘no impact at all’ to 7 = ‘a lot of impact’) were related to saving money (mean score=4.78), improving health (mean score=4.15), and avoiding toxic chemicals (mean score=4.04), messages targeting confidence perceived as most impactful were related to patience (mean score=4.47), staying busy (mean score=4.27), and soliciting support (mean score=3.84). Perceiving greater impact of messages targeting motivation was associated with greater quitting importance (B=1.16; 95% CI: 0.71–1.60, p<0.001). Neither perceived impact of messages targeting motivation nor confidence were related to quitting confidence. E-cigarette–cannabis poly-users preferred to quit cigarettes first, e-cigarette–cigarette users preferred to quit cannabis first, and poly-users of all three products preferred to quit e-cigarettes first, followed by cigarettes, then cannabis. CONCLUSIONS E-cigarette cessation interventions must use relevant messages (e.g. target financial and health benefits of quitting) and consider poly-users’ preferences for quitting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用电子烟的美国年轻人对电子烟戒烟信息和策略的反应
引言 尽管年轻成年人使用电子烟的比例很高,但针对这一人群(包括尚未准备好戒烟的人群)的戒烟干预研究却很有限。方法 我们分析了 2022 项横断面调查数据(来自一项更大规模的纵向研究),调查对象是 172 名美国年轻成人、过去一个月的电子烟使用者(平均年龄=26.95 岁;57.6% 为女性;73.3% 为白人)。我们研究了1)感知到的戒除电子烟的挑战;2)感知到的针对动机和信心的干预信息的影响,以及它们与戒烟重要性和信心的关联;3)与多种产品戒烟偏好相关的多种香烟和/或大麻的使用。结果 43.6%的人在过去一年中尝试过戒除电子烟,55.3%的人有戒烟准备;30.2%的人在过去一个月中多次使用香烟,54.1%的人多次使用大麻。经常提到的戒烟/减量挑战与压力/焦虑(41.9%)、戒烟尝试延迟(35.5%)和无聊(25.6%)有关。被认为影响最大的针对动机的信息(评分标准:1="完全没有影响 "到 7="影响很大")与省钱(平均分=4.78)、改善健康(平均分=4.15)和避免有毒化学品(平均分=4.04)有关,被认为影响最大的针对信心的信息与耐心(平均分=4.47)、保持忙碌(平均分=4.27)和寻求支持(平均分=3.84)有关。认为针对动机的信息影响更大与戒烟重要性更高相关(B=1.16;95% CI:0.71-1.60,P<0.001)。对戒烟动机和戒烟信心信息影响的感知都与戒烟信心无关。电子烟-大麻混合使用者倾向于首先戒烟,电子烟-香烟使用者倾向于首先戒大麻,三种产品的混合使用者倾向于首先戒电子烟,然后戒香烟,最后戒大麻。结论 电子烟戒烟干预措施必须使用相关信息(例如,针对戒烟的经济和健康益处),并考虑多用户的戒烟偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Conjugated Oligoelectrolytes as Optical Probes. Charge State Evolution in Electrocatalysts for Bridging the Activity-Stability Gap in Acidic Oxygen Evolution. Computational and AI-Driven Ecosystem for Structure-Based Covalent Drug Discovery. Metabolic RNA Labeling-Enabled Time-Resolved Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Multifunctional Guest-Hosting Triple-Stranded Helicates: From Anion Recognition to Quantum Information Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1