Predicting the Outcome of First Episode Psychosis Subjects by Assessing Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Volume

Praveen Arathil, Rahul Bansal, Arun Kuruppath
{"title":"Predicting the Outcome of First Episode Psychosis Subjects by Assessing Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Volume","authors":"Praveen Arathil, Rahul Bansal, Arun Kuruppath","doi":"10.20471/feb.2024.60.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) and Cognitive impairment have been described as predictors of outcome of First Episode Psychosis (FEP), therefore we aimed to find the predictors of clinical, social and functional outcome variables in a cohort of first episode non affective psychotic subjects. Subjects and Methods: A prospective follow up study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2020 in a tertiary care hospital of South India. A semi-structured questionnaire was given to all subjects for socio-demographic details. All subjects were assessed with Heidelberg scale, Bender Gestalt Test (BGT) and underwent MRI Brain 3D volumetric scan to examine NSS, cognitive impairment, and DLPFC volume at baseline respectively. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale scales (SOFAS) were administered at baseline, 1 month and at three month follow up. At 3 months, clinical and socio-functional outcome was defined by BPRS scores and SOFAS scores. Pearson’s correlation was found between DLPFC volume of all subjects, BPRS, BGT scores at baseline with BPRS and SOFAS at 3 months. To test the statistical significance of the comparison of mean values of all continuous clinical and demographic parameters between two groups of BPRS and SOFAS, Mann Whitney U test was used. Results: Smaller DLPFC volume predicted clinical, socio-functional outcome significantly. A significant moderate correlation was found between NSS and BPRS scores at baseline. Conclusion: Baseline right DLPFC volume can be an important predictor of clinical and socio-functional outcome in FEP.","PeriodicalId":8294,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/feb.2024.60.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) and Cognitive impairment have been described as predictors of outcome of First Episode Psychosis (FEP), therefore we aimed to find the predictors of clinical, social and functional outcome variables in a cohort of first episode non affective psychotic subjects. Subjects and Methods: A prospective follow up study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2020 in a tertiary care hospital of South India. A semi-structured questionnaire was given to all subjects for socio-demographic details. All subjects were assessed with Heidelberg scale, Bender Gestalt Test (BGT) and underwent MRI Brain 3D volumetric scan to examine NSS, cognitive impairment, and DLPFC volume at baseline respectively. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale scales (SOFAS) were administered at baseline, 1 month and at three month follow up. At 3 months, clinical and socio-functional outcome was defined by BPRS scores and SOFAS scores. Pearson’s correlation was found between DLPFC volume of all subjects, BPRS, BGT scores at baseline with BPRS and SOFAS at 3 months. To test the statistical significance of the comparison of mean values of all continuous clinical and demographic parameters between two groups of BPRS and SOFAS, Mann Whitney U test was used. Results: Smaller DLPFC volume predicted clinical, socio-functional outcome significantly. A significant moderate correlation was found between NSS and BPRS scores at baseline. Conclusion: Baseline right DLPFC volume can be an important predictor of clinical and socio-functional outcome in FEP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过评估背外侧前额叶皮层体积预测首发精神病受试者的结局
目的:背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)、神经系统软体征(NSS)和认知障碍已被描述为预测首发精神病(FEP)结局的因素,因此我们的目的是在一组首发非情感性精神病受试者中寻找临床、社会和功能结局变量的预测因素。研究对象和方法一项前瞻性随访研究于 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月在印度南部的一家三级医院进行。研究人员向所有受试者发放了一份半结构式问卷,以了解他们的社会人口详情。所有受试者均接受了海德堡量表、本德尔格式塔测试(BGT)评估,并接受了核磁共振成像脑三维容积扫描,以分别检查基线时的NSS、认知障碍和DLPFC容积。在基线、1个月和3个月随访时,分别进行了简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和社会与职业功能评估量表(SOFAS)。3 个月后,临床和社会功能结果由 BPRS 评分和 SOFAS 评分确定。所有受试者的 DLPFC 容量、基线时的 BPRS 和 BGT 分数与 3 个月时的 BPRS 和 SOFAS 分数之间存在皮尔逊相关性。为了检验 BPRS 和 SOFAS 两组之间所有连续性临床和人口统计学参数平均值比较的统计学意义,采用了 Mann Whitney U 检验。结果较小的DLPFC体积可显著预测临床和社会功能结果。基线时的 NSS 和 BPRS 分数之间存在明显的中度相关性。结论基线右侧 DLPFC 容量是预测 FEP 临床和社会功能预后的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Psychiatry Research
Archives of Psychiatry Research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Professionals’ Satisfaction with the Available Early Support Services, the Professional Role and the Support Provided to Children with Developmental Disabilities and Their Families ChatGPT and other Chatbots in Psychiatry Reliability of the Croatian Version of Motivation Scale for Free Time Meaning of Life in Secondary Abstainers from Alcohol (Abstain From Alcohol and Meaning of Life) Association between Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism and Clinical Outcomes as Measured with PANSS Scale in Patients With Schizophrenia in Two Psychiatric Centres in East Java – Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1